study of class, gender and race is to achieve more than the credentials in their relative growth, and the effects in specific circumstances and experiences. (pg. 2) She has noticed most sociologists do not take Marxism seriously and that theorists of gender and racial oppression have been rather hostile towards Marxism 's apparent allegations. Importantly, in our country where class does not use common sense to understand the world is an issue that remains noticeably absent from the terminology of politicians and many mass media experts. This is why people today are more apt to recognize their social and economic hardships in gender, racial and ethnic relations, other than in class terms, and in spite of that class is an indelible element of
…show more content…
Race, gender, and classes’ purpose of study is the intersections of race, gender and class (pg. 4). There is interconnecting formations of oppression regarding race, gender, and class. This represents a macro level connection linking system of oppression. Intersectionality represents a micro level processes, which is how individuals and groups both inhabit a social situation within interconnecting formations of oppression, which is defined as a metaphor of intersectionality. If it be race, gender, or class everyone has a specific identity. Each individual is either contributing to oppression, as an oppressor, or it being oppressed themselves. Oppressions should not be ranked nor must we brawl about which oppression is more important. (pg. 5) All oppression is equally valid. (4/28). To get a better understanding and speculate these connections it is necessary to be an advocate of a proposition that specifies the equality between oppressions. To gain these perspectives we need to begin asking new questions that relate to race, gender, and class, oppression, intersectionality, and so on. (pg. 5) There overall needs to be a prioritization of class (4/28). Martha Gimenez thoroughly explains her position on race, gender, and
Race, gender, and classes’ purpose of study is the intersections of race, gender and class (pg. 4). There is interconnecting formations of oppression regarding race, gender, and class. This represents a macro level connection linking system of oppression. Intersectionality represents a micro level processes, which is how individuals and groups both inhabit a social situation within interconnecting formations of oppression, which is defined as a metaphor of intersectionality. If it be race, gender, or class everyone has a specific identity. Each individual is either contributing to oppression, as an oppressor, or it being oppressed themselves. Oppressions should not be ranked nor must we brawl about which oppression is more important. (pg. 5) All oppression is equally valid. (4/28). To get a better understanding and speculate these connections it is necessary to be an advocate of a proposition that specifies the equality between oppressions. To gain these perspectives we need to begin asking new questions that relate to race, gender, and class, oppression, intersectionality, and so on. (pg. 5) There overall needs to be a prioritization of class (4/28). Martha Gimenez thoroughly explains her position on race, gender, and