Gender Stereotypes In The Neanderthal

Improved Essays
The Neanderthal subsistence portrayed in the film is also questionable. Researchers and archaeological anthropologists have found that the Neanderthals were predominantly meat-eaters and were skilled hunters; dissimilar to what was portrayed in the film. The Ulam tribe was shown to be predominantly plant eaters, and rarely in the film were they shown to be hunting for food or eating meats. According to the American Journal of Physical Anthropology, the physiological stress induced by cold climates imposed significant high-energy demands on Neanderthals’ bodies forcing them to consume high-energy and protein-rich diets (Fiorenza et. Al. 2014: 43-71). Mammals were the main fuels for the bodies of the Neanderthals, due to their high energetic …show more content…
The film never loses track of its scientific accuracy while presenting the three tribes in a unique way. The film uses grunts as the communication strategy for the Kzamm and Ulam tribes, perhaps to give the viewers a more realistic feel concerning the primitive man’s vocabulary. The Neanderthals’ physical characteristics were also portrayed realistically by the actors – large noses, large brow ridge, short, and robust (Lecture: Monday, January 23rd 2017). Their locomotor patterns were also realistic and scientifically accurate given their physical characteristics and short, stocky limbs. For their social organization, the Ulam tribe were seen taking care of their elders and the injured when they were attacked by a Homo erectus tribe. This is also consistent with scientific studies as scientists have found that the Neanderthals cared for their elders and the injured, and healed broken bones appeared common (Lecture: Monday, January 23rd 2017). Furthermore, recent DNA studies have also found that Neanderthals had red hair and pale skin – the Ulam and the Kzamm tribes were shown to have slightly red hair and pale skin in the film. The Neanderthals’ physical features also suggest that they were cold-adapted people (Lecture: Monday, January 23rd 2017). For this reason, it is very plausible that they were dependent on the use of fire for warmth and survival as it was depicted in the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Sophia Nguyen Period 5 Chapter 1 Document 1. I feel that Nisa’s account of her life helps with understanding the much earlier Paleolithic people is very helpful because it gives a first person perspective on the life of a person living in a hunting-gathering society, like the Paleolithic people. Because Nisa doesn’t get much exposure to people outside her society, communicating with others was especially more important to her. 2. To Nisa, sex was very important to her because she didn’t want to make love until she had fully realized the idea of love.…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Humans and Neanderthals are very close relatives both have many factors which differentiate the two species one another.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The early hominids had a flat nose, a strong lower jaw which stuck out, long and strong arms and curved fingers for climbing trees. Lucy's hands, feet, and her teeth were similar to a human human's…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lone Survivors Summary

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From the fossils he was able to obtain, Stringer speculated in his book that the Denisovans were indeed a sister group to the Neanderthals and split from the Homo Heidelbergensis far before the Neanderthals did. The fact that the Denisova fossil is the “most robust of all” signals that its the species with the most archaic traits (Mednikova 2013: 149). This correctly confirms Stringers’ theory about the old age of the Denisovans relative to the Neanderthals. The Denisovan fossil also correctly confirms Stringer’s speculation of Denisovans’ close affinity to the Neanderthals. One of the evidence can be that the transverse section of the hand fossil is linked to the third and fourth phalanges of a Shanidar Neanderthal as well as the left third distal phalanx of the Kiik-Koba Neanderthal.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tools Neanderthals used stone tools similar to and no more sophisticated than the ones used by early humans, including blades and scrapers made from stone flakes. As time went on, they created tools of greater complexity, utilizing materials like bones and antlers. Neanderthals used a type of glue, and later pitch, to attach stone tips to wooden shafts, creating formidable hunting spears. Social structure Neanderthals lived in nuclear families. Discoveries of elderly or deformed Neanderthal skeletons suggest that they took care of their sick and those who could not care for themselves.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wrangham theorizes that the advent of fire led to the evolution. (Wrangham 8) This explains the smaller teeth and jaws of H. erectus, and the decreased sagittal crest and masseter…

    • 1595 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Neanderthals, though extinct, are the closest relatives of modern humans (Szalay 2013). Their appearance was similar to that of Homo sapiens, but they came with a few minor differences including larger brow ridges, shorter height, and a more muscular build. However, an aspect of Neanderthals has often sparked heated debates among researchers and anthropologists: Were Neanderthals intelligent, or unintelligent? This paper will evaluate the two sides of this debate, with a focus on anthropologist John D. Speth’s position, and determine which opposition is more convincing based on the logic of given evidence.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key aspect discussed throughout this documentary paper is the role of Neanderthals in todays society, and how they compare to todays humans. Perhaps Neanderthals never existed would it affect todays humans in anyway? Throughout this documentary I learned about a species that I had not heard of or known from previous knowledge. I also found it very impressive the way that the Neanderthals went about living their lives and trying to survive.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the website of The History Channel says, "looking for the origins of mankind is a history of bone and tales they tell. It was in 1856 that the first bones of an ancestor of the missing man ... were encountered Neanderthals. "The television program, however, contradicting website States that Neanderthals not only have a brain larger than most human beings and had a greater sense of smell, they were around during the time of modern man, and therefore were not our ancestors. They are not a "real missing link" of a "forerunner of the missing man." For a clear refutation of Neanderthals as being something of a brute ancestor of ours, which is still paraded in the media and in school textbooks as evidence of the evolution of molecules to man.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One Hominin Not Ancestral to Modern Humans Modern humans are categorized as Hominin, but Homo Neanderthalensis is a hominin species that is not ancestral to modern humans. Neanderthals have distinctive structures and features differ from modern humans. For instance; slightly larger brain than modern human, mid-facial area and jaw are protruded that look like Homo erectus or Homo sapiens, small teeth, and their short, stocky bodies with thick and heavy bones that most would have been too extraordinary than modern standard humans. Scientist justified their reasoning through molecular analysis that clearly differentiate Neanderthals not ancestral to modern humans and subspecies of Homo sapiens.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, several studies have pointed to an average of 2% Neanderthal DNA in people of European and Asian descent, whereas sub-Saharan Africans have little to no Neanderthal DNA because their ancestors remained in the African continent and did not migrate to Eurasia. According to a study published in Nature last year, the interbreeding of humans and Neanderthals likely resulted in the exchange of beneficial Neanderthal genetic mutations that enabled humans to adapt to the colder climate. David Reich and his colleagues, the researchers behind this study, first analyzed the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is enough information to back up the research that has been done by the scientist. The result also supports the hypothesis stated, that modern human drove Neanderthals to extinction through competition, due to the cultural associated advantage the modern human have over the…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hominid Evolution Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This species is more closely related to humans because their arms got thinner, legs got longer, and brains became larger. Researchers were able to figure this out after finding Turkana Boy; a complete skeleton of Homo erectus. Turkana Boy was very important because scientists were able to find out more specific characteristics of Homo erectus. Another major similarity to humans, is this is approximately the point where hominids became hairless. This was indicated because they began keeping cool by sweating.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Homo Sapiens Essay

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Homo sapiens were the only existing human species left on earth evolving since about 160,000 year ago. Homo sapiens are the complete modern humans Homo is the human genus. Which also includes Homo erectus and Neanderthals plus many other extinct species of hominid family. Question is what species evolved into Homo sapiens. According to Ember & peregrine (2007).…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The location also had to do with the food supply for hunting and gathering, and food to be hunted for eating. Some animals became scarce to the Neanderthals. In the north cows were very scarce because the cows would die of frost bite or being famished, due to the lack of grass and other resources. The Neanderthals ate mostly nuts, berries, and other things they could scrounge up to eat.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays