• Home Page
  • Gender Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men

Gender Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
Show More
The film, “12 Angry Men”, is about a group of twelve jurors who have to discuss and thoroughly analyze a case. These jurors have to decide whether the eighteen-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty or not. However, there isn’t much evidence, besides two eye-witnesses and a knife. So, the group of jurors have to come up with their own reasons as to why they believe the boy is guilty or not.
There is a lot of group hate within this group. Eleven out of the twelve jurors initially vote guilty, and there is only one juror who votes not guilty. Juror #8 believes that the boy should be given a second chance, but the others disagree with him. Majority of the jurors vote guilty based on the social class and race of the boy. Juror #3 has a strong prejudice against the Hispanic teenager due to personal experience with his son. He is also the last juror to vote the defendant not guilty. Juror #3 has negative attitude towards Juror #8 and all of the others that gradually begin to agree with Juror #3.
Juror #7 tries to be dominant in the group. He was aggressive towards the other jurors and wanted the decision to be made …show more content…
You have equal power amongst the jurors and the equal say in the decisions being made, so you should take advantage of that and not show fear. My advice to the characters showing negative attitude towards others is to rethink your motives for your decisions and do not bring in personal feelings to support the reasons for your decision. This advice would be most important for Juror #3 because he based his decision off his personal experience with his son. This personal experience caused him to consider all teenagers as violent criminals. Bringing in your personal feelings into groups can cause you to make biased decisions or show negative attitude towards your group members. Experiencing or facing one immoral thing/event does not make any other thing/event

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    3rd Juror Character Analysis
    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages

    3rd Juror Character Analysis

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Juror's Change In TAM Juuror 5 By Reginald Rose
    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juror's Change In TAM Juuror 5 By Reginald Rose

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Comparing Atticus Finch And 12 Angry Men
    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Comparing Atticus Finch And 12 Angry Men

    In both of the trials, the citizens and other members of jury believe that the defendant is guilty based solely on the defendants’ race; however, Atticus and Davis both disagree with the popular opinion and are more than willing to prove and support their own opinion. In 12 Angry Men , Juror 3 loudly proclaims that the boy is guilty and that all ghetto youths are criminals, while Juror 7 wants the jury to reach a decision quickly because he wishes to attend a baseball game that evening. Juror 1 conducts a preliminary ballot and eleven jurors vote for conviction without hesitation. When Davis, or Juror 8, is the only one to disagree and cast the only dissenting vote, Juror 10 gruffly declares that Davis is a weak-willed "bleeding heart". While Juror 2, a shy and stammering bank clerk, appears to be maintaining his guilty verdict because he feels intimidated by the more outspoken jurors, Davis proudly stands his ground refusing to conform to the others’ opinions.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8
    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pathos In Juror 8

    This is an important point” (241). His quiet, yet well-rounded personality generates sympathy and admiration among readers; thus, creating pathos. Juror 11’s history proves beneficial to the case, for he understands racial prejudice as much as the boy on trial does; thus, contributing to the overal ethos and logos, as well. For these reasons, readers congratulate Reginald Rose for his syntactical expertise and ability to reveal ethos, pathos, and logos with mere grammatical configurations. Twelve Angry Men is a simple play, yet its many components make it beneficial to education and memorable.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men
    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: 12 Angry Men
    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis: 12 Angry Men

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Diversity Essay
    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Diversity Essay

    The jury in 12 angry men is quite diverse. Evidence of this diversity can be derived from the individual backgrounds of the jurors. An example is juror 5 who grew up amongst knife fights, juror 5 who grew up in the slums an juror seven ho has an affinity for baseball. This diversity helped them function as an effective team because they were able to get different points of view. An example is juror 5 explaining the dynamics of using a switch blade.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Character Analysis
    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Character Analysis

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Conformity Analysis
    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men Conformity Analysis

    One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Group Problem Solving Process In 12 Angry Men
    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Group Problem Solving Process In 12 Angry Men

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Juror # 8 In 12 Angry Men
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Juror # 8 In 12 Angry Men

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Examples Of Group Dynamics In 12 Angry Men
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Examples Of Group Dynamics In 12 Angry Men

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis
    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    A few examples would be with juror 7- voted guilty because he had a baseball game to get to, and after a long while of arguing juror 8 decided that if no one else votes not guilty then he would vote guilty and that would be the concluding verdict. The first alliance is at the beginning after everyone but juror 8 voted guilty. Juror 9 steps in and gives him a chance to explain why he doesn't find the boy guilty. This juror didn't get offended or ignorant to what juror 8 had to say. As the day goes by, jurors 3,7 and 10 make an alliance that would eventually change as more and more thoughts are said.…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men: Critique Of The Legal System
    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men: Critique Of The Legal System

    The film also explores the wanton destruction of life that the jury room presents, as well as how easy it is to accuse someone erroneously. Thus,12 Angry Men critiques the legal system by exposing the shortcomings of the jurors themselves. During the course of the film, 12 Angry Men presents the common use of stereotyping and racism. Having a jury of 12 white, middle aged men meant that a broader…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Fonda) As The Leader In The Movie Juuror 8
    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Henry Fonda) As The Leader In The Movie Juuror 8

    In the beginning, he was disrespectful and ignorant towards the boy and his fellow jurors. His attitude deteriorates when the other jurors begin to change their votes. His “readiness” level would be at a R1 (unable and unwilling or insecure) as he was the juror to change his vote. Even when the jury questions the woman’s eyesight, Juror #3 attempts a last ditch effort to defend his position and ultimately fails. What is the “leader” expectation of each of these jurors?…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings