Gender, Social Class, And Slut Discourse On Campus Essay

1431 Words Oct 13th, 2016 6 Pages
In Elizabeth A. Armstrong’s et al “Good Girls”: Gender, Social Class, and Slut Discourse on Campus, 2014 77: 100-122, the issue being addressed is what is it exactly that causes women to slut shame (Armstrong et al 2014)? This article provides the idea that social classes play a huge role when deciding who should be labelled as a slut along with that slut shaming could be done thinking that it somehow gives the person who is doing the slut shaming a personal gain (Armstrong et al 2014).
The theory that is being created in this article is, “Undergraduate women use slut stigma to draw boundaries around status groups linked to social class- while also regulating sexual behaviour and gender performance.” The main concepts of this article are the interpreting of slut discourse among women; sexuality, stigma, and defensive othering; gender performance and the circulation of stigma; intersectionality, moral boundaries, and the centrality of class. The theoretical perspective in social psychology that the authors use in the article is the Symbolic Interaction. The Symbolic Interaction perspective is when there is particular attention paid to symbolic communication. Symbolic Interaction is where interactive negotiation helps to establish social expectations and determine one’s own actions. People are able to use others as examples of how or how not to act based on what reaction is given to an action. With Symbolic Interaction we behave toward things on the base of the meaning of that…

Related Documents