Peer Review On Gender Identity Disorder

This peer review article was about the deconstructing of GID (Gender Identity Disorder), due to gender Identity being an evolving disorder that is controversial. The main reason a person suffer from gender Identity is because their gender does not fit their external makeup. In Saralyns’ article she exposes the concealed inner theory and the inconsistency and undermine in its apparent meaning or unanimity. The author also state that “These diagnosis leads to stigmatisms and results in stress, this is why some people reject the diagnosis of GID” (Russell, 2013).
Transsexual theories have been around since 1966, however none of them seem seems fit or respect the individual’s identity diagnosis. According to Russell (2013), Dr. Henry Benjamins …show more content…
All these clinical terms have been continuously debated and questioned because they have become sexist ideologies place on individuals who suffer from GID (Gender Identity …show more content…
As stated in Russlle’s research, Gender Dysphoria doesn’t occur in a particular race of community, so over a period of time if data is collected researchers will be able to have documented observation of the difference obstacles or symptoms that may affect people who suffer from Gender Dysphoria. When preforming cross sectional studies there are good and bad attributes. Some of the strengths that cross sectional research may have are that they are not complicated to conduct and there are no lengthy waiting periods to follow-up, it can also help with planning and heath resources needed to help with their condition. Some of the weakness of cross sectional research can be bias due to a low amount of occurrence and miss classification or the research may not be feasible due to short durations. Cross sectional research may not give substantial results to deal with Gender Dysphoria due to grouping being one of it essential criteria when facilitating a cross sectional