2. The authors used two sources of qualitative data: focus groups and in-depth interviews. The focus groups give the opportunity to understand the world as seen by the target population in general, to discover new concepts, generate hypotheses, and understand broad social perceptions regarding motivations to cohabit. In-depth interviews of current cohabits provide more detail and insight, revealing individual rationales underlying decisions to cohabit. The …show more content…
Long-term women tend to experience more disadvantages than men from living with a partner. For women, cohabitation is seen as entailing less commitment and legitimacy than marriage. More times than none, women go into a cohabitating relationship expecting it to lead towards marriage. Women believe that cohabitating “affects their partner really not to make the commitment. “It’s just, you know that old adage, “why buy the cow if you get the milk for free” sort of stuff.” Many women in the focus groups felt this way. Women feel an injustice in the distribution of “rewards” in cohabitation. Where, men enjoy the rewards of a marriage-like relationship without having to fulfill their end of the bargain. A lot of men do perceive cohabitation as “free milk.” Women believe that only marriage renders a relationship socially