Summary Of The Ugly Truth About Beauty By Chief Justice Roberts

Superior Essays
Under United States constitution, the democratic system should decide for gay marriage law. In Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion, he has delineated the supreme court’s position for gay marriage law. Therefore, he insisted that states government should reserve their states’ power for the gay marriage law. Due to the belief of social policy and fairness, many same-sex couples had appeal for the nationwide same-sex marriage legal approval. Unfortunately, they are bewildered on United States law system, the supreme court actually does not have the legal power to make gay marriage law but legislators and people.
Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion is absolute, he was advocating on the Americans’ right of freedom, supreme court’s
…show more content…
I believe he wanted urge his audiences about the sadness and injustice because we are no longer follow the law. Reversely, we choose to go against our ethnic and law for “superficial changes” over the time. In this event, the “superficial changes” can be referring to the changes of mentality and social influences among people or in a community; they became feeling unhappy or happy and unfair. For example: Cindy Crawford’s effect from the article “The Ugly Truth About Beauty” by Dave Barry, people believed Crawford’s body shape is the best and ideal figure for every woman. In the past, many women were unhappy about their appearance. However, our society has changed a point of view now. And they began to recognize the beauty of plus-sized body shape women by a complimentary of words such as “chubby”, “curvy” and …show more content…
But as a judge, I find the majority’s position indefensible as a matter of constitutional law” (10).
Indeed, Roberts has a very persuasive persona this dissenting opinion because he is a highly educated legal expert and a chief justice for the United States supreme court, therefore his words and writing are incredibly defined as genuine, sincere, credible and fair to his audiences from the general public, his peers, to the same-sex couples and the supporters. And so we can assure that Chief Justice Roberts’s persona is a non-bias constitutional law representative.
Finally, I concluded that Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion is effective because many facts and research have proven are true and convincing. Even though the same-sex marriage law has passed however it is still not completely accepted by our society. At the end, we have to recognize the fact that same-sex marriage’s decision must keep within a state, not United States supreme court. While, Americans must insist on our right of freedom; we must respect our law system and the democratic system should decide for Gay Marriage

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hodges. (n.d.). Oyez. ] It was also argued by the Court, that because the Constitution doesn’t directly address same-sex marriage, that the Supreme Court shouldn’t be the one deciding on the matter, but should instead be left with the…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1. The Supreme Court decisions in a case affect significantly the entire country’s legal system. Therefore, models of judicial decision making were created to explain the Supreme Court’s behavior and how they influence policies. While the legal, attitudinal and the strategic model are not the only theories of judicial decision making, those constitute the most prevalent hypotheses to explain judicial decisions.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marriage now can be between a man and woman or between same-sex people. Loving v. Virginia wasn’t the only case that influenced the ruling of this case; other cases like Lawrence v. Texas, which made same-sex sexual activity in every state legal also affected this case. In the future, knowing that cases from the past can affect current ones can change the way judge’s rule in a…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article Societal Suicide: Legalizing Gay Marriage Will Lead to More Family Breakdown and crime. Author Charles Colson conclude that Gay marriage should not be forced on fellow Americans by judicial or mayoral fiat. The authors attempt to convince the readers that Americans should be able to have a vote if it should be passed or not. I believe that if this opportunity is given to Americans. Then it will settle the argument on both sides, for those who are against it, and those who embrace it.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court argued that prohibiting same-sex marriage was a violation of the Bill of Rights, therefore, it was unconstitutional. That decision required the states to comply with the ruling and changed their constitutions to allow same-sex marriages, even if they did not approved the ruling…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The critical implications of the decision of Haque & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1765 (2 July 2015) in terms of the binding nature of opinions of Medical Officers of the Commonwealth (“MOC”) appointed by the Minister, are as it is stated in regulation 2.25A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) the (“Regulations”). In that the opinion of the MOC is to be taken as to be correct in determining whether a person meets the requirements of Public Interest Criteria (“PIC”) 4005. The delegate of the Minister is not to form their own opinion on whether or not an applicant meets the requirements of PIC 4005.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Supreme Court justices do have personal views. They are appointed through a political process. Observers naturally must ask how great a role their political views actually play. Some scholars argue that the justices’ political preferences play a large role, essentially dictating their decisions in many cases. They point to the fact that justices appointed by conservative presidents tend to vote in a conservative fashion and those appointed by liberal presidents vote the opposite way.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Loving V. Virginia In 1953, twenty-three year Richard Loving (white) and seventeen year old Mildred Jeter (black), who lived in Virginia at the time, went to the District of Columbia to get married to avoid violating Virginia’s anti-miscegenation, or interracial marriage, laws. When they moved back to Virginia, a grand jury of the Caroline County Circuit Court in October of 1958 issued a charge against the Lovings for breaking anti-miscegenation statutes in the Virginia law code. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in prison, but the judge suspended their rule on one condition: that they stayed out of the state of Virginia for twenty five years. The judge in the case, Leon M. Bazile,…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Cantwell v. Connecticut case, Newton Cantwell and his two sons, Jesse and Russell, were convicted of two crimes that breached the Connecticut state law. The Cantwells were members of the Jehovah’s witnesses and claimed to be ordained ministers, due to their religious practices they believed that it was their duty to carry their messages to others. In order to spread their message, they carried along religious materials such as pamphlets, records, books, and also had a record player that played a recording called “Enemies”, which expressed Anti-Catholicism. The initial issue in this situation is the neighborhood the Cantwells were promoting their religion, Cassius Street of New Haven, is a heavily populated with Roman Catholics. Jesse Cantwell…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commision was heard by the US Supreme Court December 5, 2017 and will be decided in 2018. The owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jack Phillips, is a christian man that designs cakes in the store. David Mullins and Charlie Craig are a same sex couple that went to Masterpiece Cakeshop with the intent of buying a wedding cake. David and Charlie asked to order a cake for their wedding, but Phillips told them that he would not make the wedding cake because it denied his religious beliefs. Phillips still offered to serve them, but he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Presidential election of 1800 President John Adams lost his reelection bid to Vice President. Adams being a staunch Federalist opposed the political beliefs Jefferson, who was a Republican. With Jefferson becoming President, Adams feared that his Federalist party would lose ground in the in the government, and the Republican would give power to the states. To prevent this Adams and his Federalist Congress decided to increase the number of Judicial positions inside the inside the Judicial Branch. President Adams spent his last hours in officer appointing Federalist judge in all positions.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Samuel Alito Case

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Justice Samuel Alito, Jr. currently holds a position on the Supreme Court of the United States as one of the court’s conservative justices. He is known for his right wing leanings that sometimes encompass libertarian ideals. His father was an immigrant, and Alito’s Italian identity would later inform the way Alito viewed discrimination. He attended Steinart High School, the local public school, where he immersed himself in extracurricular activities with a focus on student politics and debate. He graduated at the top of his class and continued his education at Princeton University.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Thesis Statement: The Equal Protection Clause of The Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state. The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Windsor led, many states to legalize same-sex marriage. This set the stage for Obergefell v. Hodges. On June 26, 2013, The Supreme Court struck down The Defense of Marriage Act.…

    • 1941 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays