Gay Marriage Should Be Legalized In The United States

Improved Essays
Gay Marriage

What would you think if one of your parents wants to marry someone that’s the same gender as them? Same-sex couples are people too and they have the right to marry even if they are the same gender. They’re several reasons why homosexuals feel strongly about wanting to be legally married. Gay marriage should be legalized in all states and countries, it has been held off for too long. “America’s lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender citizens contribute to serve in our military, and is apart of our nation” (Takano 2).
There are 1,049 benefits, rights and privileges offered through legal marriage in the United States. A same-sex couple is prevented from legally marrying, they’re being denied these rights and the equal protection of the law. They are not letting anyone marry the same gender as their own, the law is you will be treated equal and get the same rights as everyone else. We live in a tolerant world and minorities need to be protected, they are the most susceptible to being discriminated against even from a legal point of view.
“Court did not announce whether states that decide not to recognize same-sex marriage” (Takano 1).
…show more content…
In May 2004, Massachusetts became the first state to legalize same-sex marriage. They argue that allowing homosexual couples to marry will destroy the Sanctity of Marriage because there will be different kind of couples out there and they all think that it is wrong to marry someone the same gender as you. On the contrary eliminating those remaining unconstitutional barriers to marriage further enhances the institution. With the ruling we got today we may have to continue to fight some of those battles in court, because there are going to be some people that are wanting everyone to fight about gay marriage, then they’re going to be people that are not going to want anyone fighting for the rights for gay

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article Societal Suicide: Legalizing Gay Marriage Will Lead to More Family Breakdown and crime. Author Charles Colson conclude that Gay marriage should not be forced on fellow Americans by judicial or mayoral fiat. The authors attempt to convince the readers that Americans should be able to have a vote if it should be passed or not. I believe that if this opportunity is given to Americans. Then it will settle the argument on both sides, for those who are against it, and those who embrace it.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a very interesting topic for me and a very personal one as well. It hits home for those that are dear to me that there are so many challenges that we have to face on a daily basis regarding the issue of what is legal, moral, and thereof. I think that throughout the United States and across the country that there are many government officials and administration that are faced with the decisions of having to change many rules, policies, and regulation to accommodate the new law that grant same sex individuals and couples the same equal rights and protection to be in a union or marriage like that of the traditional marriage of that of a man and woman. There has been many challenges from many interest groups that was either against or for the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is an issue that is similar to nearly every controversial issue in America History. Most conscientious social issues in America life begin with a large majority of traditionalists pushing back, then some dramatic event event will usually occur, following that public opinion will slowly start to even out, and eventually past actions/ideas will be seen as prejudiced. It's like America collectively goes through the stages of grief before we see social justice: Denial, a lot of anger, barraging, sadness, and then finally acceptance. Along with million of Americans who felt similarly, we saw denial in Senator Jesse Helms by saying that homosexuals were morally wrenched, and believing that homosexuality was a choice. Collectively, we saw the anger in families across the country disowning their children; similarly there was anger in the viscous murder of Matthew Shepard.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 26th of June 2015 was a day that went down in history for the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) community. This was the date of the decision for the landmark Supreme Court case, Obergefell v. Hodges, which determined that same-sex marriages were to be considered legal in all fifty states (Obergefell v. Hodges, 2015). Those who are in the LGBT community were overjoyed to finally have the long awaited marriage rights that had been granted to heterosexual couples for hundreds of years (Pearson, Sanchez, & Martinez, 2015). The Supreme Court decision is representative of the changes that have occurred in the United States in regard to LGBT individuals over time.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years, gay marriage has been seen as something that is taboo or immoral, but as United States society has come to be more accepting, gay marriage has become a regular occurrence. On June 26, 2015, American society changed forever when the ruling in favor of the plaintiff in the Obergefell v. Hodges case legalized homosexual marriage in the United States. Many people have opposed the marriage of two men or two women for religious purposes. However, many people also support said marriage, reasoning that love is love no matter the gender of the individuals getting married. The ruling made nine months ago has effected people of all sexualities and religious affiliations.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A big thing is that the couple gets their marital benefits. When a couple gets married they get many great benefits that a single person wouldn’t get, so a homosexual would say this was fair to them. Denying some people the option to marry is discriminatory and creates a second class of citizens. (1) People want to believe that they can love the people that they want to love, not the people that they legally have too.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, the one thing that holds them back is the law. Many states in the U.S banned homosexual marriage due to the fact that marriage between man and woman has been around for the past millennia. Lots of people thinks that same-sex marriage is one of the reasons that and that it supposedly wrecks the balance between traditional marriage and the balance between man and woman that’s supposed to equally balance the differences and family to create a brand- new creation to create man and woman as one. Phooey. People don’t know who is able to enforce marriage.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why? Being gay is natural. Sure, moral fundamentalists may think it is a sin, but who are they to deny rights to those who are doing something that is just as right as a man loving a woman? Gays couples can be models of family life, offering just as much love and support for children as hetersexual couples. Gender should not be covered by marriage law, as the constitution protects US citizens from gender discrimination.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are laws that a for the LGBT community and there are laws against the LGBT community. When one law is made there is always a new one to repel the old ones. Some laws such as the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 lets the government treat same sex couples like they are not even married. Other laws make same sex couples pay heavy taxes and same sex couples are not allowed to have marriage benefits like opposite sex couples. An example of these taxes is about “Windsor [who] got bitter news later in the form of federal and New York estate tax bills totaling $600,000 that would not have been levied on an opposite-sex couple” (Jost).…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Laws legalizing gay and lesbian couples gives the churches and other religious groups some conscience protection to refuse to marry them. Legal grounds are murkier for religiously affiliated organizations than it is for hospitals, schools, and other social providers that may not grant benefits to the spouse of an employee in a same sex marriage or providing adoption and other services to gay and lesbian couples that are routinely provided for heterosexual couples. Religious communities are divided deeply over the issue of same sex marriages. Groups that play a leading role in the opposition of gay marriages are the Catholic Church, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and many evangelical Christian groups, like the Southern Baptist…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A recent hot topic in the media and society is whether same-sex partners should be allowed to get married. Some people believe that it is a civil right protected by the United States Constitution for same-sex partners to marry as they are just like everyone else, not second class citizens, but others feel marriage is meant to be a union between a man and woman. Despite which side of the topic people take, it is interesting to look through past judicial cases and see the progression that has taken place brining us to our current situation today. Throughout the years it can be seen how certain cases built upon each other like stepping stones until the point was reached to determine if gay marriage was a constitutionally protected right.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays