Obergefell V. Hodges: What Is The Outlawing Of Gay Marriage?

Superior Essays
For many years, gay marriage has been seen as something that is taboo or immoral, but as United States society has come to be more accepting, gay marriage has become a regular occurrence. On June 26, 2015, American society changed forever when the ruling in favor of the plaintiff in the Obergefell v. Hodges case legalized homosexual marriage in the United States. Many people have opposed the marriage of two men or two women for religious purposes. However, many people also support said marriage, reasoning that love is love no matter the gender of the individuals getting married. The ruling made nine months ago has effected people of all sexualities and religious affiliations. It no longer matters how American citizens view gay marriage, as it has now become a civil right. This crucial supreme court ruling created civil rights that America has never seen before, and altered the way …show more content…
The defendants, in one final bid for the outlawing of gay marriage, stated that allowing homosexual marriage would “sever the connection between natural procreation and marriages” (Obergefell v. Hodges 26). By saying this, the defendants are distinctly stating that marriage is only for procreation and those who ultimately end up getting married, homosexual or heterosexual, are only doing it to have children and procreate. The same defendants also argued that legalizing same-sex marriage would harm marriage by leading to fewer heterosexual marriages (Obergefell v. Hodges 26). These anti-gay rights defendants had no statistical fact off of which this statement was based. After careful evaluation of both the plaintiff’s and defendant 's’ arguments, five out of nine supreme court justices voted in favor of the plaintiff, giving him the majority vote (“Facts of the Case”). At that exact moment, American law changed perpetually to include homosexual marriage as a civil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened the door for change, and showed that changing marriage, something that had been around for ages was possible. With Obergefell v. Hodges, the concept of marriage was also changed, two people of the same- sex can now marry each other. The talk of making interracial marriage legal impacted how the ruling of Obergefell v. Hodges turned out. People realized that steering away from the traditional concept of marriage in the 21st century was completely acceptable and that same-sex marriage could be the next step. Same as in Loving v. Virginia, Obergefell v. Hodges also had a connection between marriage and liberty, which made it easier for the court to…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court has gained a tremendous amount of power since the states first approved of the rights and limitations set forth for it in Article III during the Constitutional ratification process. Some of this accumulated power, such as the ability to analyze the constitutionality of Congressional legislation, appears to be justifiable in most cases. However, there have been several instances, especially the recent Obergefell v. Hodges case, where the Court has seemed to overstep its boundaries by a considerable margin. The problem is that the extent of the Court’s power depends on the interpretation of its authority as stated in the Constitution, and the Court itself has been granted the primary right to Constitutional interpretation. As…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saying that one marriage is “less worthy” than other marriages just because of the gender(s) that are involved is a disgrace and should have been illegal from the beginning. Two polls on ballotpedia.org state that the majority of those polled, in these two 2015 studies, either favored or strongly favored the legalization of same sex marriage. The article also states that at least a third of Americans had changed their standpoint on this subject throughout their lives. Ultimately, I believe this shows that the public can be and is progressive and is right to legalize same sex…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case was decided on June 2015. With a 5-4 decision, the right to marriage, originally saved for “traditional” couples meaning man and women, was extended to same-sex couples. This would overrule any states previous laws against same-sex marriage. This marriage would become legal throughout the entire country. Although, the Supreme Court made this ruling, many against gay rights argue that it is unconstitutional.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-sex couple had proven to be as a stable and equal as opposite-sex couples and the state was not legitimately protecting the morality of society by putting one group down at a lower level when it came to rights, recognition, and protection. The Obergefell case restored the definition of equality to be generally applied that now meant the recognition of same-sex couples under the federal law. Although at the time of ratification the controversy did not involve the dispute of whether same-sex couples would be protected under this amendment, this case shows the continuation of the disagreement in what equality entails. These cases clarified that the constitution was not only color-blind but also blind to sexual…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gay marriage is an issue that is similar to nearly every controversial issue in America History. Most conscientious social issues in America life begin with a large majority of traditionalists pushing back, then some dramatic event event will usually occur, following that public opinion will slowly start to even out, and eventually past actions/ideas will be seen as prejudiced. It's like America collectively goes through the stages of grief before we see social justice: Denial, a lot of anger, barraging, sadness, and then finally acceptance. Along with million of Americans who felt similarly, we saw denial in Senator Jesse Helms by saying that homosexuals were morally wrenched, and believing that homosexuality was a choice. Collectively, we saw the anger in families across the country disowning their children; similarly there was anger in the viscous murder of Matthew Shepard.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26th 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of marriage equality for the LGBT community, sparking both a huge change in how LGBT relationships are viewed, and an enormous controversy debating the morality of equality (Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al., 2015). The phrase "morality of equality" is used in this instance because while all this judgment did was give LGBT people the right to marry any legally consenting adult, there are people who feel this equality is still somehow immoral. This feeling of immorality in relation to marriage equality is generally related to religious beliefs, and should have nothing to do with the legality of the situation. The Obergefell vs. Hodges case was monumental for the LGBT community.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court practiced the use of the supremacy clause by over riding states laws and establishing a law for all the land of gay marriage being legal. No matter what laws states had prior to this regarding marriage became irrelevant because of this new law from the Supreme Court. Gay marriage has always been extremely controversial in the United States. Everyone seems to have a view on it that stems from their religion or personal…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Religion Pros And Cons

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This grants, according to Washington Post, a “turning point. A majority of Americans now live in states where gay couples can wed.” Numerous newspapers and websites announced that gay and lesbian couples were getting married within hours of the decision. Nevertheless, the fight is not over. Some opponents express that legalization of same-sex marriage is a decision that should be left to the discretion of the people.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why? Being gay is natural. Sure, moral fundamentalists may think it is a sin, but who are they to deny rights to those who are doing something that is just as right as a man loving a woman? Gays couples can be models of family life, offering just as much love and support for children as hetersexual couples. Gender should not be covered by marriage law, as the constitution protects US citizens from gender discrimination.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays