World War I: Germany's Alliances

Improved Essays
The author of the source, Gary Sheffield, believes that Germany was completely aware that, with their actions and decisions, they would be creating a major war. Sheffield uses case studies such as Germany’s alliance with Austria and the fact that Germany broke a French-Russian alliance to support his view. As well as this, Sheffield states that WWI was utterly and completely Germany’s fault as he states that Britain, Russia and France’s stance in the war was completely defensive, and so, they did not have any hand in the creation and/or development of the war, but only attempted to end the war. Sheffield’s view of the reasons for WWI is similar to that which the Triple Entente used to place the reparations of the war upon Germany in 1918. …show more content…
Each of these countries was looking out for themselves while making these pacts. These alliances were said to have been a major reason for the fast-paced development of the war as many countries which had no business in the war were forced to take part in the war. An example of this would be Germany’s alliance with Austria-Hungary, which was one of the first major alliances during WWI. Austria-Hungary were having difficulty controlling Serbia (one of their colonies) when Russia decided to defend Serbia against them, and as they were evidently struggling with these many countries that were against them, Germany decided to act on their alliance with Austria and team up with them against Russia. Alliances in the late 19th century were a form of defence – countries used them in the hopes that other countries would not attack them, knowing them were defended with alliances. They were a method of which European countries practiced the foreign policy known as protectionism. The source is correct in the sense that Germany was one of the first countries to act on the alliance system during WWI, in which they gave Austria “unconditional support, without which may have not allowed the war to develop so quickly. However Germany was not the only country to offer alliances (i.e. Britain and Belgium alliance): and so the complete …show more content…
The source is correct to an extent that Germany knew that their actions would later result in a war, but without other countries’ involvement, the war would not have been possible. Austria’s expansionism into the Balkans began the issue of revolution and Russia’s involvement into the war. In addition, Britain and France’s involvement to the war could have been minimized if it were not for the existence of alliances. The source may not be embraced with the issue of Russia, Britain and France’s position as being purely defensive considering each of these countries had a contribution to the creation and development of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Fay states that, “One must abandon the dictum of the Versailles Treaty that Germany and her allies were solely responsible. It was a dictum exacted by the victors” although it is true that Germany’s aggressive militaristic attitude help add tension, but not create an unavoidable war, Germany had participated in the First World War mostly out of defensive reasons instead of aggressive as seen in their ally Austria. It is seen that Germany’s only real aggressive moves in which Germany made was during the both Moroccan crisis and the Anglo-Germany Naval rivalry, which are seen as factors to World War One. During the Kaiser’s visit in Morocco in 1905, Kaiser Wilhelm II had decided to state his idea of sovereignty of the Sultan, challenging French influence in Morocco , as “the Kaiser and his advisers desperately wanted Germany to be a World Power on the same level as Britain” . However, the Kaisers wishes of being seen as a World Power in 1905 ended in a disaster, the French were furious that Germany was interfering in their…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    AJP Taylor described it as war by timetable and July 28th 1914 is the key turning point when war became inevitable. It is true that other countries could have made different decisions and avoided war in 1914 but the balance of power would have shifted very favourably towards Germany. A situation none of the Triple entente could tolerate. Germany knew this and still Germany forged ahead. The Kaiser’s argument that Britain would not risk war with its ‘contemptibly small army’ over a little scrap of paper’ to defend Belgium neutrality was naive at best.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    England, in turn, entered the war because a successful German attack on France and Belgium would have made Germany too powerful. Germany and Russia brought their armies rapidly because each one feared defeat by powerful enemies because of delay. Germany and Russia also rashly committed themselves to support Balkan clients (Austria-Hungary and Serbia) because Berlin feared that failure to do so would cost them the trust of important allies and leave them isolated. This was all driven by the fact that Germany wanted control of more land and spread the conflict even…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although one may argue that Germany played was not to blame for causing World War I because tensions between European nations made war inevitable, to a great extent Germany should be blamed for the war because Germany was responsible for initiating tangled alliance systems in Europe, German militarism started the European arms race by creating a large army during peacetime, and Germany was responsible for several nations, including Great Britain and the United States, entering the war. Although some may argue that Germany was not to blame for World War I because preexisting tensions between European powers made war unavoidable, Germany is responsible for World War I due to furthering these tensions by the being the first European nation…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Did Germany Cause Ww1

    • 1088 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before the war Germany both refused to renew its treaty with Russia and formed the Triple Alliance creating fear and tension between European countries. On May 20, 1882, Germany formed the Triple Alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy. The three countries banded together promising to help one another in a time of war. Because of this the countries were able to supply more troops toward the German cause in the war. In retaliation the offensive countries, mainly France, Great Britain, and Russia, supplied even more troops to their side of the battle.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sleepwalkers Summary

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the end, both historians agree that nations fell into war because they were incapable of resolving their problems without an inventive political leader, such as Bismarck. Overall, both MacMillan and Clark used their book to discuss the origins of the Great War, a major turning point in history, and used similar points and arguments in doing so despite some differences. Their articles both combine to give a well rounded view into the start of the war and its casus…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By practicing militarism, Germany fostered an environment of mutual distrust and intense rivalry in Europe. Countries like Great Britain and Russia felt compelled to increase the size and training of their armies and navies so that Germany, or any other militaristic country, could not easily overpower them. In addition, German militarism led to a focus on conflict that made many Europeans anticipate war. By holding armies of a million or more men and strategizing heavily for combat, countries, such as Germany, Great…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the book “The Treaty of Versailles” it states “ The first section of the Treaty of Versailles was to covenant of the League of Nations. It opened with a statement of its purpose: ‘The high contracting parties [in] order to promote international co-operation and to achieve international peace and security by the acceptance of obligation not to resort to war (Brezina).’” The treaties main purpose was to stop wars from occurring but right after the treaty was established nations felt the need to resort to war. According to www.PBS.org it states “ The Treaty of Versailles created a political climate in Germany which the right put all the blame on everything that went sour, onto the traty and the lost war. And that created this climate in which many people then began to think one had to fight the war once again,” this shows us how the treaty was so unfair on the part of Germany that people felt another word needed to emerge in order to be released from the current situation they were put into. Instead of representing peace the treaty lead nations into another world war.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If taking the Cold War for example, both the United States and USSR were in an arms race, but that was insurance in case the other were to take an offensive approach. Both states knew the consequences of what war would do to them, so they acted accordingly to survive. Another example as to why defensive is better than offensive, is because offensive rarely works in the modern world. In Nazi Germany, Hitler was fairly close to a European takeover, but the countries that he aligned himself with messed him up, by moving too fast, before he was able to take down Britain and Russia. Once Hitler would have gotten through the majority of Europe, the United States would have been at the top of his list to invade.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there’s one thing Europe and the rest of the world learned from World War I, it is that massive, complicated alliances will only create a huge blown out war that may completely annihilate entire countries to start over from the ground up. These days, complicated allies are not as prominent, but the ways of communication, understanding, and basic diplomatic interactions are. The U.S. struggles to find its rightful place is the affairs of foreign countries without tying themselves to closely and potentially putting themselves in danger on the homeland. Diplomatic interactions and communications will continue to be very important as more terrorist groups emerge in the middle east and take over, and it will be interesting to see how future leaders (including and especially the U.S.) will respond and worth with other countries to promote peace and…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays