Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary

Improved Essays
This passage or article was written by controversial ecologist, his name is Garrett Hardin.
Hardin wrote a lot of significant papers, for instance, “The Tragedy of the Commons” (1963). In the passage of “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor” which is written by Hardin, the main argument is about rich and poor countries. He states that rich countries should not help poor ones, so the rich countries do not have to share their resources with the poor countries. In addition, he illustrates in the passage that the rich countries are in a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean and the poor ones in the water fighting for survival. Also, he said that the increase in the number of population in poor nations should be considered in mind as soon as possible, or it will be chaos everywhere.

Hardin is shown in the passage that the Earth as a lifeboat in the sea. He divided the world in two, rich and poor countries. The rich countries are the people in the lifeboat and the poor are the ones in the sea begging for help to survive. He illustrated that in the lifeboat there is a limited capacity to have people and if the people of the boat want to survive, they need to as much as it could be under the limit capacity. Even though, he states that rich people in the boat have a quality conscience of having the
…show more content…
He gave convincing points such as the numbers in the boat and how it will drown if it exceeds beyond the capacity limit. In addition, his numbers and theory were very accurate, especially when it comes to the overpopulation issue. Furthermore, the way he connected both the lifeboat with the life resource is so convincing. Also, how they will lose the safety factor. He argued it completely logical. Moreover, he gave a significant point to the people who feel guilty. He said if they feel that way, why they get on the boat from the first

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Life Boat Ethics Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Garrett Hardin, the author of this essay, is trying to explain this topic as survival of the fittest by saying that the wealthier countries and the people that…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the argument essay “Lifeboat ethics, the case against Aid that does harm”, Garrett Hardin presents his opinions on world population and world food. The article starts off with the analogy of the Earth as a spaceship, but then advances to the Earth as a lifeboat. The reason for the move away from the spaceship analogy and onto the lifeboat analogy, is that a true spaceship would have to be under the control of a Captain, and no Captain could possibly survive if his course were to be determined by committee. Because there is no real United Nations, with any real power, then we cannot consider this to be a spaceship commanded by a Captain. Moreover, there is not a deciding authority to make the hard decisions, to enforce the rules…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It Can Only Get Better From Here On April 14, 2017, 1,503 people died due to one tragic accident and authors made thousands of dollar by writing about it. This accident happened when the Titanic crashed into an iceberg. Deborah Hopkinson was one of those authors. She wrote the book Titanic Voices From the Disaster, but it wasn’t very fascinating.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his essay “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping the Poor” (1974), Garrett Hardin argues that wealthy nations should not help impoverished countries. Hardin urges his audience not to share or give away natural resources to countries in need so that there can be plenty of resources in the future. Hardin explains how overpopulation due to immigration and reproduction will affect our natural resources. Hardin uses a serious tone with his audience in an attempt to persuade them not to be wasteful or generous with their natural resources. Garrett was an American ecologist and philosopher whose lifeboat metaphor makes people think of their future and their resources.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Peter Singer Famine

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To Hardin, it is nationhood and the concept of overpopulation that should dictate an individual’s role in helping the poor. He believes those that live far away on other continents, or within other states, should not receive help from those in wealthy nations like the United States. American citizens, according to Hardin, have no obligation to help those that are starving in other countries, even as a result of a failing government. He believes that any foreign aid given to states will only lead to worse outcomes for the rest of the world. If countries provide foreign aid, “poor countries will not learn to mend their ways, and will suffer progressively great emergencies as their population grows.”…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Hardin’s essay is full of very debatable facts and data. The government can and can not be blamed for the problems poor countries, middle and high class people make or have to do with. Firstly, Hardin says that the world population has a slight percentage to just stop reproducing one day, when will that day be? Hardin makes a comparison to a lifeboat, and what I mean by that I that Hardin sees Earth as a lifeboat and the boat is slowly getting full. This shows his views on earth and how it is overpopulating.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Modest Proposal Essay

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This in turn produces a new nation with which helpful citizens can live in unity. When one nation gives to another nation who then learns how to produce the necessary resources to survive without assistance, then it produces a ripple effect. Which then creates a system in which everybody helps everybody and no man is left behind. With Hardin’s mindset comes cynical thinking that in order to stay on top you must tread on those beneath you, however, it’s much easier to help people than it is to harm…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (210)”. Dad is willing to engage in extremely risky behavior of not only force Miles to work on the boat but he also fishes in protected water to make money. Dad feels that he has to participate in these actions because it is the only option left for him. Parrett is showing that people who are very desperate will make decisions that they would not normally make to try and save themselves.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As population numbers of every country is different, needed resources are also unequal. In our crowded world, there are many people who are living good lives while two thirds of the population are living a poor life. Through Lifeboat Ethics: the Case against Helping the Poor written by Garrett Hardin (1974) it explains how there are many dangers of overpopulation through the world. Hardin goes into detail about how overpopulation and having different population’s causes for an unequal resource need. Hardin’s article has many strengths and weakness to prove his point that there are many things wrong with overpopulation and what the world is trying to do to deal with these issues.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. In other words, it is the study of what is wrong and right, good or bad. Humanity has been intrigued with the answer to these subject matters for hundreds of years. In that time there have been several philosophers such as Aristotle who have formulated moral theories like Virtue ethics. Not all of these theories are put in practice today but they do help in the solving of moral issues.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The I part that I find persuasive that Montgomery talks about is that we share our resources with others when we don't even have enough for our own and that the earth has good stuff and we should make use of it. It is true we are in need and we should take care of our own before helping others. “We are not responsible for the rest of humanity” (539). It might sound greedy in a way, but sometime we have to do certain things and think for ourselves sometimes. There are many resources in the world that I believe can be useful and helpful in theses situations.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lifeboat has a limited capacity size of people that can fit for it to function. In his argument, the lifeboat has some room for more people, but not enough for all the people…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 3: What are the connections between the Malthusian view of natural resources and economics and the view of Garrett Hardin on the commons as laid out in his essay “Tragedy of the commons”? Why do you think such views are popular in the context of the environment? Do such views emerge from an inequitable view of society? Answer: Malthusian view :When the Population was less none of the thinker thought that in near future there will be a scarcity of natural resources .…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Sheri Fink, “The moral values, ethical codes and laws that guide our choices are...important to help us navigate the confusing and disorienting time of a disaster.” Although ethics and morals are important in everyday life, they become of greater importance during a time of difficulty. In the book, The Lifeboat, by Charlotte Rogan, the morals of Grace Winter reflect the value of doing what is good for the entire community, no matter the consequences of doing so, which contradicts the ethics of her society due to the illegality of murder. The action of the fight between herself and the boat’s self deployed captain, Mr. Hardie, represents a moral dilemma because Grace is conflicted with the ethicality of killing him. Based on her…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Examined Life is a collection of various forms arguments from numerous philosophers on a range of topics Cornel West on the nature of truth and the courage to examine oneself, Avital Ronell discuss the limits of meaning, Singer speaks on applied ethics and consumption, Kwame Anthony Appiah on cosmopolitanism, Martha Nussbaum on justice and disability, Michael Hardt on the meaning of revolution in the US, Žižek on ecology, human waste and artificiality, and Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor on disability/impairment and the limits of individualism in America. In the first section of this paper I will attempt to classify each of these argument into the four type of arguments that Wilhoit’s presents in “A Briefs Guide to Writing Academic Argument” he explains four different types of academic arguments. Proposal arguments in generally speaking has 2 parts: a problem and a solution section (Wilhoit, 2009, p.240) in examined life I find two instances of this type of argument, Ronell’s “Meaning”, Singers “Ethics” and Martha Nussbuam’S “Justice” , in the following paragraphs I will attempt to support this claims with reason from the text and movie of Examined Life.…

    • 1820 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays