Goncalves-Peña writes about how courts have responded to variety of political asylum cases relating to gang threats in Central America. Specifically, she looks at how courts have interpreted the meanings and boundaries of political asylum. The article is analytical and references refugee law to define refugee and accounts of asylum. The article also looks at court cases, including INS v. Elias, Desir v. Ilchert, Zayas-Marini v. INS, and Osorio v. INS.
The author explains that state policies have been ineffective in solving gang violence and organized crime by neglecting focus on structural issues that lead to gang involvement (243). People have left their homes to protest gang power and find safety; however, US courts have refused to grant
The author explains that state policies have been ineffective in solving gang violence and organized crime by neglecting focus on structural issues that lead to gang involvement (243). People have left their homes to protest gang power and find safety; however, US courts have refused to grant