Mahatma Gandhi Nonviolence Analysis

Good Essays
In this passage, Gandhi talks about what nonviolence means to him. He talks about how important it is for him and his people to fight with the method of nonviolence. He talks about how nonviolence is a part of his life and how important it is for his movements like satyagraha, noncooperation, and civil disobedience. He also says non violence is the only way India can gain freedom.
I believe that he is right, India gained their freedom, because of Gandhi and his non-violence method of fighting. Many people admired Gandhi because he wasn’t fighting like everyone else, not with guns, but with nonviolence. He was honest and real people, with no hate for anyone, which is also why he had a big hand in India’s freedom.
For example, no one was allowed
…show more content…
They were beaten and insulted but at the end, they won. They won the fight and respect that they deserved because they didn’t fight back. They decided to ignore all the hatered. Like the famous saying, “an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”. In this passage, Gandhi talks about how England took all the recourses from India and now Indian is taking all its recourses from their villages. He then also talks about how true India is in it’s 7 million villages. He wants to make all the villages back to how it was. He does not like the modernized India and wants to close down all the unnecessary mills in India. He wants the people of India who lives in big cities to stop exploiting the villages and try to make them strong.
I believe that he is right, India mainly lies in its agricultural field and if they kept making mills and factories in villages, after some time, they will have no villages and no agriculture, it would affect their economy a lot. Like he said, true India lies in its village, and if they want to save their country, the first step to take is to stop making unnecessary mills and start supporting their villages

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    One of many beginnings to a single end, “India’s independence was finally granted in August 1947”. It is easy to see the end of British reign as a group effort, but one must consider Mahatma Gandhi’s diligent work. Using a widespread hate of the British, he united the Indian people; a feat that had never been imagined, let alone done before. Gandhi brought together a passionate and tenacious rebellion through the workings of nonviolence against simple-minded, callous brutality. The fight for Indian political freedoms may be over, but the injustices of the world are far from it.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gandhi didn’t attack the enemy, he took an approach that was unlike no other. He was very subtle, calm, and he knew what to do to get the best result. These qualities sometimes worked, but sometimes they resulted in some conflicts where people of India died. Great Britain, at the time, was a ruthless…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He taught his Indians that they must to fight for them rights, but without violence. He advised that everyone need not keep to nonviolence, especially if it were used as a cover for cowardice, saying, "where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." (Gandhi, Rajmohan (2006) pp. 2, 8, 269). The Indians do not have to obey British’s laws and to not respect them.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The assassination of Mohandas Gandhi was unjust because he was non- violent, and he fought for people's rights in India, and Gandhi was a feature of help by bringing Hindus and Muslims together to share power: however some believe that Gandhi had too much power. The society of India hated him also. First one reason why the killing of Gandhi was unjust because flat out and clearly he was a non violent person. Mohandas Gandhi did not hurt anyone or when he was hurt and beaten he did not attempt to fight back or anything. For example the author in “How did Gandhi- win”stated.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They both seek to do things that help influence themselves or the people around them through their choices they make along the way and how they decide to protect human rights. Antigone chooses to bury Polyneices and defend his human rights of a proper burial. Gandhi refuses to move which start his non violent revolts and protects his rights through a nonviolent movement. These two people from our world’s past, as well as many other influential people, have influenced this world for the better. Whether it be to stop racial discrimination or give someone all their rights that they are entitled to as a human…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Through the power of nonviolent action as a viable means of social protest, Gandhi demonstrated the power of civil disobedience by defying the salt law. This simple act of disobedience to the law was promoted among the masses and demonstrated the powerful effects of civil disobedience, raising questions about the true legitimacy of British rule in India. In non-cooperation efforts against the raj Gandhi called for Indians to leave all councils, courts, and classrooms established by the British, and to also boycott all foreign cloth. The effects of this boycott served to paralyzed British organizations, and the non-cooperation movement gained momentum. Gandhi’s efforts in nonviolent social change through civil disobedience and non-cooperation contributed to public policy, by providing the structure for the 1960’s Civil Rights movement that gave rise to the African American non-violent demonstrations.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The British built tanneries in India in order to take the needed land from the innocent people. As the “storm” occupies the village of Rukmani it “[leaves a] disaster and desolation” the people struggle more for food, protection and survival (Markandaya 41). The storm that demolishes the town symbolizes the British storming into India and decimating the native’s livelihood. Even though the massive storm of Great Britain attacks the town, it mentions how “the [British] tannery stood, its brick and cement had held it together” showing how British territories and land seek to remain and stay put (Markandaya 41). Britain 's industrialized invention of the tannery results in resources, and land to be taken away from the people; however, when the “storm” of the Britain hits, the powerful building stands.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In The Ramayana, duty and fulfilling one’s obligations is important. The story of Rama is the story of a man fighting evil as part of his natural mission as an incarnation of Vishnu. Dharma, the principle of cosmic order, plays a large part in this because the characters have their duties and roles in this world that must follow through with in order to assure the balance of the universe. As a method of teaching in the ancient Indian society, The Ramayana teaches its audience to accept their responsibilities and carry out their duties. Dharma, by definition, means law.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is also a social virtue to be cultivated like other virtues. Surely society is largely regulated by the expression of nonviolence in its mutual meanings. What I asked for is an extension of it on a larger, national and international scale” (p. 209). Mahatma Gandhi understood that it was easy to be nonviolent and non-confrontational when there were no issues going on, but when people were challenging those protesting, were they going to continue to stand their ground and remain nonviolent. He wanted to challenge people to remain true to the movement and see that more could be accomplished through peaceful protest as opposed to burning down buildings and destroying the places they lived.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A decade later, Gandhi led a march of civil disobedience against the British Raj to end the monopoly the British empire had over Indian salt. Gandhi believed that salt is a necessary commodity and the British have no right to control what's not theirs. The salt movement led to the arrest of tens of thousands of Indians including Gandhi himself. Gandhi was soon released from jail, and a few years later the British went to war with Germany. The Indians used the war to their benefit by demanding independence and self rule.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays