Gadamer's Argument Analysis

Decent Essays
One aspect of Gadamer’s critique of Enlightenment thinking is through challenging the way prejudice and authority are treated in the hermeneutical task. In his development of “effective historical consciousness” he views these aspects as greatly important in interpretation. This portion of his argument is especially significant for Christian theology because Enlightenment views of tradition and prejudice impact the Christian tradition. In Enlightenment thinking all prejudice is to be removed, which includes the authority given to Scripture. What he finds in this stance against prejudice is an adoption of “Cartesian doubt,” that nothing can be certain. Contra this assertion, Gadamer argues that all understanding involves some prejudice and

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    (4) Who comes out on top in their debate, Velleman or Haslanger? Whichever side you take, make sure your argument focuses on their different views of the relationship between identity and biology. In the debate over the relationship between identity and biology between J. David Velleman and Sally Haslanger, I firmly stand behind Haslanger in her argument against Velleman’s ideology that "an individual’s identity is solely linked to knowing ones biology and having direct influence to their biological parent. " Though they both have some concurrent points such as finding “the trend of reproductive technology and the assumptions behind it, especially the way it feeds the desire to have “designer babies” with the right sort of genetic background”(Haslanger, p.2), I believe that Haslanger's argument was more substantive with empirical and personal experience in her argument over Vlleman's personal experience in knowing his biological background and having his own children knowing their biological background…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wente's Argument Analysis

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the end, Wente's editorial made for an enlightening read for some discussion and debate but missed her mark here in being able to convince the reader through any persuasive effort she may have had by imploring poor use of authority and enabling an irrational way of thinking. Wente's lack in understanding of what it means being a parent herself made her argument baseless and claims ever-more dubious. Discussions like this calls for a voice to reasoning, a voice in objection, and clarity, and, preferably, a voice of unparalleled firsthand account. Unfortunately for Wente she is not that voice.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is a great example for proving that there is a flaw in the way schools develop he definition of a belief vs. fact; McBrayer says that schools are not using the right terms when defining these two, thus creating chaos when a child/teenager has to decide whether something is true or false, or right or wrong. He points out that the problem is that schools basically play something like the "Devil's advocate" when having a child choose whether something is a fact or a belief, when really every case is different and some facts can or cannot be proven. McBrayer also validates his argument by providing proof that he found the problem in his son's school "When I went to visit my son’s second grade open house, I found a troubling pair of signs hanging…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jennine Capó Crucet writes the article talking about if she chose the wrong college. She starts off by stating her college options and the price she had to pay for each college. Crucet applied to two colleges: Cornell and the University of Florida. She received a full ride from University of Florida and had to pay “ a subsidized loan of $4,000 a year in my name and an additional ‘expected family contribution.’ ” for Cornell. The author talked about her experience in Cornell and if she thought it was worth the debt that she took on.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, this blame is solely placed on the observer when the accountability should be shared with the participant. The participant makes the conscious choice to head out into public where he could be observed at any moment, yet when he does, the blame is placed onto the observer for examining an intimate moment. Gerstein makes the mistake of putting forth a very confusing and contradicting statement by saying that he does not blame the observers when he does, and then goes to wholly place the guilt onto them. He comes off extremely biased in favour of the participant and he does not, once again, put forth any counterarguments. He does not consider all sides of the issue and does not attempt to answer any possibly rebuttals, such as what if it is not the fault of the observer but actually the fault of the participant?…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schleiermacher is adamant about introducing a new understanding of religion, based off the idea of religion being solely based on feeling rather than knowledge. He claims that religion may be grasped entirely by imagination and that much like metaphysics and morals, religion aims to determine the relationship between the universe, humanity and itself. Unlike Kant, Schleiermacher places a rather emotional as well as sensory importance on the image of religion. It is intuition as well as feeling in which religion’s essence lies, rather than as previous theorists who may have made a different connection with acting and knowledge to the concept of religion. (Schleiermacher, 102) Religion is not based off what can be placed directly in front of…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his speech Glaucon introduces us to the argument stating his beliefs on why do people created and follow justice. Most of his argument is based on the idea that “the badness of suffering it [injustice] far exceeds the goodness of doing it [justice]” (358 e). He believes that as a consequence of this fact people come to an agreement not to do injustice to avoid suffering it. The people that enter this agreement tend to have experienced both sides, doing injustice and receiving injustice or do not have the power to make injustices and avoid suffering them. The goal of his argument is to convince Socrates that justice is good for what it brings and not for what it is.…

    • 1689 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Veitch suggests that we can turn stressful moments and make them enjoyable. Veitch’s main idea is that we can make our own fun out of frustrating situations by creating a game out of it. In my opinion, I agree with Veitch’s argument because, this is helpful for people to turn frustrating moments into an enjoyable one instead. In my experience, when I was waiting at a doctor’s office, boredom made me frustrated because I was waiting so long and had nothing to do, it made me mad about the situation I was in. If I made a game to make it more interesting, and I wouldn’t have been mad about waiting.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Gnostics: Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity, David Brakke argues for an approach for the rethinking of Gnosticism and its rejection by the Church. Gnosticism reveals as a diverse set of beliefs different from that of the early Christians. This book displays scholarly debates on the interpretation of Gnosticism and the ancient Christians. Some scholars argue that Gnosticism is a mark of imperfection and individuals should simply ignore it. On the other hand, modern scholars debate that Gnosticism provides evidence for early religious movements and the information helps to categorize them (4).…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Dare to Know” The medieval man considered religion above all else, with life composed and ordered by God. His duty was to accept the Word, live accordingly, and reach salvation. As the seventeenth century matured, man’s ideas and theories began to mature and change. Certain men, “philosophes,” began to confront the medieval man’s way of thinking.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The scholarship of religion has historically borrowed from the fields of anthropology and sociology in its analysis of religious practices. In response to the displacement of understanding around religion into a fully observable and explainable phenomenon, a subset of scholars have argued to bring back an understanding of religion that is theological, giving respect to divine factors. One such scholar, German theologian and philosopher Friedrich Schleiermacher pushed the envelope within the study of religion, in his work On Religion, to emphasize the ownership that individual agents have in intuitively connecting with their religious practices. He argues that religion is a multidimensional practice that goes beyond simple sociological or anthropological paradigms. Despite such merit in his intent, Schleiermacher fails in achieving such expansion of analysis in the study of religion by falling back on arguments that render religion academically unapproachable and moreover, vulnerable to critiques of the Enlightenment period.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Curzer's Argument Analysis

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    from that era actually worked. There are many theorists that contradict the traditional family from the 1950s and give more support to Curzer’s claim. One of the philosophers that creates a conflict to the traditional family and helps Curzer’s argument is John Stuart Mill. Mill’s moral theory states that morality is about the consequences of our actions and not about character like Aristotle says, or arguments or intentions.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas articulately explain the nature of the Divine Intellect in their respective works The Salvation, “Metaphysics” and Summa Contra Gentiles: Book One: God. They offer arguments that contrast one another concerning the divine intellect, and in particular, God’s ability to intellect singulars. Despite the convincing nature of Avicenna’s proofs, Aquinas effectively proves God’s knowledge of singulars by a sound argument that supports God’s knowledge of singulars, a proof that necessitates this reality, and in turn, provides an argument that undercuts the necessity that God cannot intellect singulars.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anselm Vs Aquinas

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Anselm of Canterbury and Thomas Aquinas, well-established theologians in the history of Christianity, aimed to probe the unexplored and insufficiently answered questions of their faith. In their arguments, presented in Anselm’s Cur Deus Homo and Aquinas’ Summa Theologia, each presents a desire to better understand his religion from within its own ideology. Aquinas and Anselm both rely on the premises of Christianity as the foundational support of their arguments, ruling out the possibility that these works were written with the intention of convincing non-believers to convert. Despite this similarity, though, their methods of inquiry differ; while Anselm stays within the bounds of Christian teachings to evidence his arguments, Aquinas relies…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Montaigne’s essay An Apology for Raymond Sebond, he defends the work and philosophy of Sebond, which he defines as a “bold and courageous” defense of the Christian religion using natural, human reason, meant to counter atheists (Montaigne 491). Objections arose to this work, and the one Montaigne approaches more thoroughly is that Sebond is wrong overall in his defense of faith, and that faith is not necessary in the acquisition of knowledge about worldly matters (Montaigne 500-501). This argument Montaigne counters with numerous claims, but the one in question is this: man has no knowledge to speak of outside of the divine, as we have not been equipped to judge the world around us. It is worth pointing out that, while Montaigne spends…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays