Did you know in some high schools in Ohio, the minimum GPA to participate in sports is only a 1.0? GPAs should be the factor to decide if a high schooler is eligible to play in sports, due to the facts that having a standard encourages students in the classroom, it also helps them outside of high school and into their college years, and sets a good example throughout the district for other students to follow.
Firstly, having GPAs as the decision to pass kids into sports or not encourages these students to work hard in their studies. Without that extra push, these students can easily fall behind in their efforts to work hard and not get the full advantage of learning in the classroom, by just ‘getting by’. In the article Athletes’ Minimum …show more content…
With the GPAs being raised, and kids getting smarter, it increases the overall atmosphere of a place and can really make a difference in the way a class runs or a student behaves. Grades are very important, and with the help of the students and faculty can help implement an overall great change all throughout a community. The article argues, “Administrators saw students go to college in athletic scholarships but then flunk out soon after because their grades were too low. Superintendent Bruce Hoover said, ‘it was kind of a sad statement about our district,’” This depressing fact shows what could happen if the GPAs aren’t implemented. Just imagine what a community would be like with the great efforts of all the students! To conclude, an argument could be put up saying GPAs shouldn’t be implemented because all students should have a chance to play, regardless of grades. If schools just let any kid play a sport, whats the benifit in it? The child is getting terrible grades and is getting rewarded for it! Sports should be for the kids who do deserve something like a sport and get treated because of their efforts in school. It sets a bad example to the other kids as well by saying that if you do something bad, like fail a test, you get rewarded for it, and that’s
Firstly, having GPAs as the decision to pass kids into sports or not encourages these students to work hard in their studies. Without that extra push, these students can easily fall behind in their efforts to work hard and not get the full advantage of learning in the classroom, by just ‘getting by’. In the article Athletes’ Minimum …show more content…
With the GPAs being raised, and kids getting smarter, it increases the overall atmosphere of a place and can really make a difference in the way a class runs or a student behaves. Grades are very important, and with the help of the students and faculty can help implement an overall great change all throughout a community. The article argues, “Administrators saw students go to college in athletic scholarships but then flunk out soon after because their grades were too low. Superintendent Bruce Hoover said, ‘it was kind of a sad statement about our district,’” This depressing fact shows what could happen if the GPAs aren’t implemented. Just imagine what a community would be like with the great efforts of all the students! To conclude, an argument could be put up saying GPAs shouldn’t be implemented because all students should have a chance to play, regardless of grades. If schools just let any kid play a sport, whats the benifit in it? The child is getting terrible grades and is getting rewarded for it! Sports should be for the kids who do deserve something like a sport and get treated because of their efforts in school. It sets a bad example to the other kids as well by saying that if you do something bad, like fail a test, you get rewarded for it, and that’s