In the U.S., genetically modified organism (GMO) food has promptly become a more and more significant part in markets since it was invented. GMO food was really a enormous breakthrough of human civilization. Most GMO food has still not been labeled in markets, so it leads to a campaign between consumers and food companies for mandatory labeling GMOs in food (Gasparro 1). Those consumers doubt the government and food companies are pretending not to label GMO in food. However, much evidence shows that food companies or government is more possibly not lying for labeling GMO in food.
Food companies or government does not have to delude for labeling GMOs in food as there is not any proof that GMO food is malicious to people’s health. In the article, …show more content…
government will spend more time and extra money if they label GMOs in food, which means non-GMO food would be spread cross America when labeling GMOs is mandated. However, at present, there are a few big food companies that propose to offer non-GMO food to consumers, so non-GMOs have not been widespread yet (Gasparro 2). In other words, most food in the markets today is still genetically modified. Therefore, customers are not supposed to distinguish the GMO food and non-GMOs since the food they eat is almost genetically modified and safe. Another big problem is that in the food supply chain, food suppliers have to make sure if their ingredients are pure non-GMO if some companies decide to sell non-GMO food. For example, honey suppliers have to be very careful to prevent the cross-pollination that happens between genetically modified crops and conventional crops. This would be a hard and complicated job since the bees fly around a big region, so this would be difficult for food companies to make sure if their food is pure genetically modified. In addition, the government has not set any standard to divide the GMOs and non-GMOs. In this way, dropping GMOs is only a beginning so far. Non-GMO food does not have the same quantity as GMOs in markets (Gasparro 3). Shortly speaking, the possibility that government is not lying for labeling GMOs in food is intensified much
Food companies or government does not have to delude for labeling GMOs in food as there is not any proof that GMO food is malicious to people’s health. In the article, …show more content…
government will spend more time and extra money if they label GMOs in food, which means non-GMO food would be spread cross America when labeling GMOs is mandated. However, at present, there are a few big food companies that propose to offer non-GMO food to consumers, so non-GMOs have not been widespread yet (Gasparro 2). In other words, most food in the markets today is still genetically modified. Therefore, customers are not supposed to distinguish the GMO food and non-GMOs since the food they eat is almost genetically modified and safe. Another big problem is that in the food supply chain, food suppliers have to make sure if their ingredients are pure non-GMO if some companies decide to sell non-GMO food. For example, honey suppliers have to be very careful to prevent the cross-pollination that happens between genetically modified crops and conventional crops. This would be a hard and complicated job since the bees fly around a big region, so this would be difficult for food companies to make sure if their food is pure genetically modified. In addition, the government has not set any standard to divide the GMOs and non-GMOs. In this way, dropping GMOs is only a beginning so far. Non-GMO food does not have the same quantity as GMOs in markets (Gasparro 3). Shortly speaking, the possibility that government is not lying for labeling GMOs in food is intensified much