Future Court Cases

Decent Essays
3. A precedent is an interpretation made by a judge from an earlier case that is often referred to for a future case with a similar issue. This relates to stare decisis in that the precedent has a high effect on future cases and the judge will likely make the same decision unless the court finds a good reason to change it. An example of this is the Plessy V. Ferguson case. In this case, the judge decided that segregation was okay as long as the blacks and whites receive equal opportunities. This decision became a precedent in that for about 60 years’ judges would refer to that case and decided the same thing when it came to cases relating to that same issue. The judge that decide the same thing for 60 years were practicing stare decisis.

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Define the following 25 legal terms: 1.HIPAA Privacy Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the privacy requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of HIPPA of 1996 and safeguard identifiable health information. ________________________ 2.HIPAA Security Rule _Federal regulations created to implement the security requirements within the administrative simplification subtitle of the HIPPA 1996 ________________________ 3.Medical malpractice __A type of action in which the plaintiff must demonstrate that a physician-patient, nurse-patient, therapist-patient, or other healthcare provider-patient relationship existed at the time of the alleged wrongful act.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stare decisis is the principle that past decisions made by the judicial system are applied to similar issues within the jurisdiction. In the case Griswold V. Connecticut the initial ruling was over turned by the Supreme Court, finding that Connecticut’s Laws on birth control were unconstitutional. The defendants were initially charged with accessories in the assistance of preventing conception. The Supreme Court reversed this ruling because married couples have the right to privacy, in which, they have the right to seek medical assistance to prevent conception. Roe V. Wade’s reversal was built on the precedent of Griswold V. Connecticut’s rights of privacy.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This case is similar to Plessy vs. Ferguson, but happened 60 years after. Plessy vs. Ferguson is a case also dealing with segregation where blacks were able to be served in separate but equal accommodations. For example, the blacks were able to ride the back of the bus, go to the "black only" restroom and drink from the "black only" water fountain. This is judgment against the black. If there was any black that touched or entered anything of the whites then they were to be harassed and that experience was never good.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drobner V. Lancet Case

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. The issue in this case is if the Drobner v. Peters case should be used as a precedent to dismiss the Woods v. Lancet case, that is whether or not an infant plaintiff could recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained in the mother’s womb during the ninth month of pregnancy resulting in serious injuries, permanently damaging the infant. Citing Drobner v. Peters, the Special Term granted the motion and dismissed the suit on the grounds that infant plaintiff’s failed to state a cause of action, thus taking the position that its allegations, though true, gave the infant no right to recover damages in the courts of New York. The defendant also claimed that there was no medical evidence that proved the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from her…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A precedent is a former case that might have some of the same issues that the judge can use to help solve the present case by being informed of how the former judge interpreted the constitution. 2) This model gives the Supreme Court justices the right to deal any hand they want. They can make a case go either way with their choosing. Some Supreme Court justices might differ completely on a decision from one another on the same case but it is completely legal.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lawrence V. Wade

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Amanda Black Exam Essays Fall Quarter 12/5/2007 Scalia explains his dissenting opinion to the overturning of Lawrence v. Texas by comparing the case to Roe v. Wade in three areas. He looks at stare decisis, fundamental rights, and legal moralism. There are three things that need to be proven before the court can overrule a decision in regards to stare decisis. 1) Its foundations have been eroded by subsequent decisions; 2) it has been subject to substantial and continuing criticism; 3) it has not induced individual or social reliance that counsels against overturning it.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Together these cases, representing school segregation as a national issue, were initially brought to the supreme court on December 9,1952. Reaching a decision in 1954, the Supreme Court ruled that “in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”. Although this combination of court cases even reaching the Supreme Court seemed to be an advancement towards greater equality, the decision had little impact on the deeper issues at hand. The court focused on desegregation as the assignment of students without considering other factors including race, religion, or nationality.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 22, 2016, I sat in courtroom 507 of the Fresno County Superior Court, under the Honorable Judge Timothy Kams. Judge Kams was conducting a jury selection for a jury trial dealing with a felony DUI case. During the jury selection, I witnessed a Venire. A venire or jury pool, is a master list or jury list, from which a petit panel is selected, typically is based on names drawn from voter registration lists or lists of licensed drivers over eighteen years of age (Lippmann, 2014, p.518). I also witnessed a Voir Dire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The majority decision in this case was unanimous but Supreme Court chose to side with Brown. According to “Landmark Cases of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Summary of the Decision | (www.Streetlaw.org, landmarkcases.org/en/Page/522/Summary_of_the_Decision), " The Court found the practice of segregation unconstitutional and refused to apply to its decision on Plessy v. Ferguson to 'the field of public education'. " This means that the Court thought that it was wrong to separate schools by race and call them equal, because if everyone was equal they wouldn't be separated. This allowed for the precedent to be made that anyone segregating a race would doing wrong on the Constitution.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Supreme Court will follow precedent — the cases it has previously decided. Even justices who might disagree with a precedent (including those who dissented when the case was originally decided) will almost always feel bound to apply it to later cases. As decisions on a particular issue accumulate, the Court might clarify or modify its doctrines, but the earlier precedents will mark the starting point. History is full of examples of newly elected presidents vowing to change particular precedents of the Supreme Court, but failing despite the appointment of new justices. Stare decisis ensures that doctrinal changes are likely to be gradual rather than abrupt and that well-entrenched decisions are unlikely to be overturned.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Serena Pang Professor Karl A. Boedecker BUS 301 April 6, 2017 I. Court(s) visited: San Francisco Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court, which is located in 850 Bryant Street, San Francisco. II. Day(s) and Time(s) Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. III. Judge: I could not hear the name of the Judge.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Powell v. Alabama case of 1932 was a fundamental case for its time. This case happened at the height of Segregation between African Americans and the whites in America. The case involved nine African American boys in the South that jumped on an empty freight train heading to Alabama. A group of young white men jumped the train as well sometime throughout the night. The two parties eventually met up, where then a fight happened between them.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Noting Justice Scalia’s work on Constitutional interpretation, two competing approaches will be discussed. According to Justice Scalia, there are four approaches to Constitutional interpretation: Textualism, Strict Constructivism, Legislative intent, and Living Constitution. However, the most prominent approaches to Statutory and Constitutional interpretation are textualism and living Constitution. Justice Scalia makes a case for textualism. He explains in his essay “A Matter of Interpretation,” that textualism is the proper approach to interpreting the Constitution.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Common Law And Islamic Law

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stare decisis means the use of precedents when making legal decisions. This is found in common law system but not in civil and Islamic law systems (Opolot, 1980). Stare decisis allows judges to look back at past cases and make their judgment based on the outcome of the past case (Darbyshire, 2001). Stare decicis forms a precedent that is to be used from that moment forward (Opolot, 1980). In civil law system judges are not to look back at past cases to render their decisions.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays