Futile Treatment Summary

Improved Essays
The author described the futile treatment as the treatment that has a less than 10% chance of success. This treatment that has no meaning to prolonging survival or can only slow down an inevitable death (Li, 2012). He also goes on to describe that futile treatment is not black or white, rather it is a gray area where the quality of life needs to be addressed with the patient or legal next of kin. Health care providers, confronted with ethical dilemmas in which there is no manual on how to decide when to continue and discontinue treatment. All professionals in health care are taught bioethical principles which comprise of autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. According to the author, physicians in general choose to discontinue

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I support Jecker and Pagon’s side. Futility and inhumanity have medical and moral meanings and can be useful in deciding whether to continue or withdraw medical intervention. The main goal of a physician is to make sure that their patient benefits from the treatment. Such as in the case they described of Michael, the infant born with prune belly syndrome, the child was not born to live a full and healthy life right from the start. The doctors tried their best in the short three months of his life, but it was next to impossible to remain hopeful of fixing him.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The policy prohibits active euthanasia, but the statement begins to deny that no further treatment is related to the intentional termination of life. Rachels points out the mistake in the statement. He thinks that doctors are only worried about the patient will die soon, or the patient’s life will become a huge burden. Nonetheless, he shows the same viewpoint in these cases that significant difference between killing and letting die hardly exist in the case of euthanasia. No matter what humane reasons that a doctor decides to let a patient die, his decision would be morally reprehensible.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors carry a lot of responsibility; they are expected to save and of fix lives. Patients know there are medical miracles, and everyone wants to be that miracle. But doctors understand the reality. If someone is suffering terminally ill, is it ethical for a doctor to end the misery? Or should they wait around for the very slim chance of a medical miracle?…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Brock mentions that “A central aspect of human dignity lies in people's capacity to direct their lives”. The concept of “individual self-determination” is thus strongly linked to dignity. This former principle makes that given the plurality of patients’ cases, they should all be granted the right to choose for their death. Also, for Brock the individual is the only one who can decide whether his/her life is still a benefit or a “burden”. To support his defense of active euthanasia and assisted suicide, Brock takes a consequentialist approach and argues that there is no morally significant difference between a patient choosing to forego “life-sustaining treatment”, meaning the patient voluntary chooses for passive euthanasia, and active euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eboigbodin 1 Eboigbodin Gregory James Slaughter Christian Morality/ Period 4 AMDG Physician Assisted Suicide Is Physician Assisted Suicide ethically Right or Wrong? The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are both emotional and debatable as it ranks high with abortion. Some argue that (PAS) is ethically permissible for an ill dying patient who has choosing to escape the intolerable sufferings at the end of life. However, it is the physician’s duty to ease the patient 's suffering, which at times, justifies the idea of providing aids in dying. These arguments rely on respect for individual autonomy, which recognizes the rights of people to choose the regulation and manner…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A conflict between a physician and patient on the course of treatment is a common topic that arises in bioethical conversation. This case explores the topic of paternalistic choices dealing with patient autonomy and when it is ethically reasonable for a physician to intervene and decide as to whether an individual is competent to make decisions about their own care. The patient in the case, Mr. Howe was asked to make a lifesaving medical decision while in duress and not fully understanding the procedure and the potential outcome if he refused. In this case I believe the physician made the correct decision to intubate Mr. Howe against his explicit instructions not to. The physician made a determination that the patient was not accurately expressing his wishes as if he was of sound mind.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medicine could cause the patient 's treatment to prolong his/hers suffering but won’t help anyone if they are terminally ill. It’s a waste of resources which that corrupts medicine and causes a lot of loss of money for the families and patient’s. People say medicine is a tool used for healing, not for killing. They say it distorts doctor-patient relationships, and will perverse incentives for insurance powers. This is not that case-- Medicine is used for healing in only some cases.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are times, however, that decisions become more difficult. One situation is during end of life care. The line between what is ethical and what provides the quickest relief from symptoms can cause the health care provider to rightfully question their practices. Although providing lethal doses of medication to cause death is a quick way to relieve terminal symptoms, it is unethical for the health care practitioner to participate in such practices because the practitioner is causing harm to the patient. Further, assisting a patient with dying is illegal in all but three states in the United States, and is in direct contrast to a biblical worldview which teaches that we are not to murder.…

    • 1856 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    Why can’t I get the treatment I want?” (Newman, 1996). Severely ill patients will be able to die with dignity and honor rather than waiting for their sickness to consume every part of them. Forbidding someone who is terminally ill and is suffer gives that patient a feeling of being trapped in agony and their…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical principles are not laws, but guiding principles about what is good and what is bad, that should direct doctors and other health care professionals in their work and decision making. Issues arising over end-of-life care involving decisions that affect the nature and timing of an individual's death raise difficult ethical conflicts for all concerned and can be a source of discord between health professionals within a team, health professionals and family members, or between different family members. Ethical dilemmas arise when there is a perceived conflicting duty to the patient, such as a conflict between a duty to preserve life and a duty to act in a patient's best interests, or when an ethical principle such as respect for autonomy conflicts with a duty not to…

    • 3174 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since Beauchamp and Childress wrote The Principles of Biomedical Ethics in 1977, patient autonomy, justice, non-maleficence and beneficence have been accepted as the four major medical principles (Murgic, 2015). In my opinion, autonomy is the hardest principle to implement especially in end-of-life care. I am reflecting on the Charlie Gard case where a healthy baby boy was born and it was soon discovered he had a rare genetic mutation that affected his brain, his musculature and most other major organs. The health care team reviewed the potential outcomes for this baby and decided that the best option was to allow him to “die with dignity”, remove life support and not pursue any untested experimental treatment. This could have been the end…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, Steinbock tries to refute the claims about euthanasia presented by James Rachels, and tries to show how Rachel’s misinterpreted the American Medical Association 's doctrine regarding euthanasia. Steinbock states that contrary to Rachel’s interpretation, the AMA does not endorse any type of euthanasia, and that the termination of life is never the goal in a professional medical practice. Steinbock argues that Rachel 's error in his essay was the linkage of ending “extraordinary care” and passive euthanasia. Steinbock says that stoppage of extraordinary care or treatment that would prolong one 's life and creates burden for that patient is not always linked to the intention of death. Steinbock says “there can be a point (to the cessation of life-prolonging treatment) other than an endeavor to bring about the patient’s death,” Steinbock continues to provide examples where withholding treatment does not necessarily mean that this decision was made for the cession of life.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    No person should have to endure terminal suffering that is unremitting, unbearable, or prolonged. When the burdens of life outweigh the benefits because of uncontrollable pain, severe psychological suffering, loss of dignity, or loss of quality of life as judged by the patient, and when the circumstances are not remediable, the dying person should be able to ask for and receive help in assisted suicide (Marker, Smith 47-51). It is further argued that assisted suicide for incurably ill persons experiencing extreme suffering can be distinguished from euthanasia used for the purpose of genocide on the grounds that it is based on principles of dignity, honor, and respect and is chosen and enacted by the dying individuals, rather than being forced on them against their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays