Fusion Vs Nuclear Energy

Improved Essays
Nine different power plants presented their proposals the past few days, and they all were very informative. There were a couple proposals that intrigued me, and a few that I do not like at all. All of the presentations were full of information and knew what they were talking about, but some stood out over others because of the energy type, not the presentation. There were two companies that presented types of nuclear energy, fission and fusion. Although they are both nuclear energy sources, the way they make electricity is very different. These two energy sources are my favorite because they are exponentially more efficient and reliable than any other source, and they create no emissions at all. Fission generates 1,000,000 times more energy …show more content…
A few flaws are meltdowns in older reactors (the Seabrook plant is new and the most advanced), and the radioactive waste can only be stored on site, deep in the ground. Nuclear fusion is currently a more experimental source of energy; only three plants are actually public. It is still in development stages, but If New Hampshire can be one of the first to use the stellarator, it could draw the attention of other states and countries to follow. Fusion can work and we have seen it work. Someone needs to be the first or second, otherwise this amazing energy source would never get …show more content…
Hydroelectricity, solar, wind and geothermal are not nearly as efficient as fossil fuels and are exponentially less efficient than the two nuclear sources. These four are all “green” energy sources, which mean they do not produce emissions or pollutants. They are weather dependant for the most part and require a large amount of land to generate just enough electricity for a few hundred houses. Hydroelectricity, wind power, and solar power need it to either be not dry, windy or sunny to operate well. A large amount of the time the weather and climate of New Hampshire does not cooperate like that. Out of the these choices wind is the most reliable and largest power producer. They are green, but not the solution for the future.
Geothermal energy uses heat from the ground to generate electricity, but it takes up space and a lot of money to get in the ground six miles deep. Biomass energy is somewhat similar to fossil fuels because it is a natural source of fuel that is living or was living that is burnt to create energy. The issue is the pollutants and emissions created along with need for land to grow biomass

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Geothermal energy is one of the oldest sources of energy. (Geo) a Latin root meaning earth and (thermo) a Greek root meaning heat, is where the word originates from. A simple way to phrase it would be that you are using renewable, heat energy from the earth. So what exactly does it do? According to an article by Alternative Energy Some forms of geothermal energy heats up groundwater.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear energy is the energy released during nuclear fission or fusion. Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which a heavy nucleus splits spontaneously or on impact with another particle, with the release of energy. Nuclear fusion on the contrary is the exact opposite; it gathers energy from the heavy nucleus combining with the shot particle. These two combined produce a lot of energy that is used all over the world on a daily basis. Nuclear power has proved to serve a huge part of our society today.…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of TMI

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think we should keep TMI(Three Mile Island) because the positives outweigh the cons. In my opinion, keeping TMI would be a good idea because of the amount of energy it can produce. If they closed TMI then a lot of people would lose their jobs. TMI produces emission free energy unlike coal or other fuels. If TMI closes, then Pennsylvania's main source of energy would be coal or propane which is very bad for the air.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The concepts of nuclear fusion and fission have recently taken a great role on the future of energy acquirement. Nuclear energy seemingly is the way of the future as it is exceedingly more efficient than any means of energy that which we have now. In nuclear power plants, fission is used to generate the power required to develop steam which then powers turbines. Fusion on the other hand, is essentially the reaction that occurs in the sun. Essentially, "Hydrogen nuclei (such as deuterium and tritium – basically, hydrogen with extra neutrons) fuse to form helium, and the mass defect is released as energy."…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear energy has been tried and tested over the years and has been reliable. The technical feasibility is also in place, we already have nuclear reactors that are up and running, we even are in the development process of fusion reactors, which will be even more efficient. Unfortunately, this is where the viability of nuclear power starts to fall apart. In his TED talk Joe Lassiter, a senior fellow at Harvard Business School and a climate change researcher, says it best: “So what's holding new nuclear back? Outdated regulations and yesterday's mindsets.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fuoco 1 Cole Fuoco Mrs. Bedell English 10H 10 January 2016 Nuclear Fusion: The Energy Solution It seems like science fiction saying that a city like San Francisco can achieve all of its power needs for a year with only a couple hundred gallons of water, but it true with the incredible power of nuclear fusion. As humans in our ongoing society we are always striving to save a pretty penny, embrace efficiency, and preserve the planet from our harmful pollution. However, it seems as if the human race is quite substantive with their decision to refrain from making the giant leap forward to the holy grail of energy.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contribution To Canada

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Wind is quick to install and has no air pollution or greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change. Wind energy preserves water sources. Economic development. Does not produce any harmful waterborne emissions or toxic solid wastes. most econominal sources of new large-scale electricity generation.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I'm not trying to be pro-nuclear, I'm just pro-arithmetic” said David MacKay, while trying to explain that this was the only option at this point whether anyone liked it or not. The United States is on their toes trying to figure out the best routes to go to create energy: solar and wind, coal, or nuclear. Solar and wind are found to soon die out and have nothing left to support the United States. Coal is a resource which we are running low on and soon will not be able to find, then we have nuclear which can solve most of our problems without running out. The United States should use nuclear energy, because we can recycle warheads into energy, lower the amount of waste we create, and become more efficient.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Geothermal heat pumps take advantage of the temperature difference by exchange heat with earth and are able to heat and cool and even provide hot water. These systems are very expensive and this is one of the negative thing of this energy sources. Hydropower is the next one we are learning about. Hydroelectric generation use to be a stable for energy whenever there was a river or a fast-moving stream. There are a lot of Dams that are used for this some big ones like the Hoover Dam.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Beginning in the 1960’s nuclear power was believed to be an attractive alternative to fossil fuels and was even referred to as the energy source of the future. To the uninformed the use of nuclear energy may seem frightening because the only thing rumored is the negatives like: the waste, major spills of material and disastrous radioactive accidents, but there are many benefits from the use of this energy source such as: saving millions of lives, a mass reduction of pollution, and an advancement of technology. Although it may take a long time, society will benefit from this energy source. The reason why we should support the use of nuclear energy is because, “scientists have estimated that if all the accidents at nuclear reactors were averaged…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear Vs Nuclear

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nuclear power is efficient, it is effective, but when the power plant is unstable, catastrophe happens. We can see this at the Chernobyl Disaster and the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Coal is not reactive, it is very stable. The estimated casualties by cause of nuclear radiation exposure is over one million by nuclear…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Development: The energy produced would be the amount of kilowatt hours produced per unit of fuel in a reactor. While coal is purported to be inexpensive, it releases a huge…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These are not the only beneficial outcomes of nuclear power, there are several beneficial outcomes than just those three. But if you are considering building a power plant but still aren’t sure about it, you should consider doing so more research on it if you still are unsure about the outcomes of it. Considering you are the governor, you have a large number of responsibilities as to what happens in the counties, but I very much hope you will allow the nuclear power company to build a power plant in the town of Enola because like in the I sated in the information on the previous paragraphs it has various benefits towards different stuff. So if you do decide to build one, I promise you that you will not be disappointed by the outcomes.…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear power has been under debate for many years; with issues such as environmental impact, safety, cost, waste management, and efficiency, the cons clearly outweigh the pros. Nuclear power plants have been supplying electricity to the population for nearly 60 years, but all things must come to an end as better options emerge and humanity develops as a species. It 's only natural for things to become outdated, or be replaced by better options as they become available. Nuclear power is a source of energy, created through a reaction when a uranium atom is split, releasing heat that is used to produce electricity. It was initially used as an alternative to coal, as coal-burning facilities were becoming a hazard to the environment.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays