Essay On Exclusionary Rules

Improved Essays
Law enforcement must follow a strict procedure before obtaining search warrants. When obtaining evidence, it is important to follow proper legal procedure. If the police officer failed to follow the procedure, this can cause the evidence inadmissible in court. As a result, the evidence cannot be used in court. There are three main concerns when obtaining evidence: exclusionary rule, fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, and debate whether exclusionary rule deter police misconduct.
The exclusionary rules outline legitimate way of collecting evidence and forbidden evidence in violation of the Constitution. The purpose of the exclusionary rules is to "discourage police from circumventing protection housed within the Fourth and Fifth Amendment
…show more content…
The doctrine has four exceptions, which are good faith, inevitable discovery, attenuation, and independent source. Good faith is an officer act with reasonable assurance according to the law. For example, Arizona v. Evans extended the good faith exception to exclusionary rules. The case was about Isaac Evan drove the wrong ways on a one-way street, which cause a police officer Bryan Sargent to stopped and check his driver license. Evan explained to the officer his license had been suspended. Sargent verified his license by the computer and showed Evan had an outstanding misdemeanor warrant. Sargent arrested Evan and searched his car. In the car, the police found marijuana and charged Evan for possession of marijuana. On the contrary, Sargent discovered the warrant had been rejected (Stringer, 1996). Supreme Court decided to eliminate the evidence. Exclusionary rules do not apply because of error in police record. Inevitable discovery refers to evidence would have been found without illegal act. For example, Nix v. Williams’s case showed law enforments ' massive search would have found Pamela Powers 's body without Willam 's statement. Thus, Supreme Court decided the rule does not apply even though the police Mirandize William after the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Fremont Weeks concluding that searching his residence without a warrant was unconstitutional and violating his fourth amendment rights. The United States Supreme Court decision would become the exclusionary rule barring the admission of evidence illegally obtained. The United States Supreme Court influenced the police by regulating how they conduct their searches in the future. A reasonable search is considered when the police have probable cause to believe that they can find evidence that you committed a crime and the judge may grant police a search warrant. Prior to Fremont Weeks case all of the evidence obtained regardless how it was seized was allowed all relevant evidence, regardless of how it was obtained.…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Alomar and Bell’s case there is a definite infringement on section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and therefore, the photographs of Ms. Alomar holding a handgun should be inadmissible to the trial. Including this evidence would be injustice when coming to a final verdict due to the fact that it violates section 8 of the Charter which states that “everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure” The search of the photos was not authorized by the law because there was no consent expressed or implied by Ms. Alomar. Reason for judgment is found in paragraph 19 and quotes “Det. Colabello immediately went into the cell phone log and noted the last two or three cells in her note book. She also looked…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the advantages of the Exclusionary rule was intended to dissuade police from wrongdoing. The exclusionary rule empowers courts to prohibit implicating proof to be presented at trial until it has been confirmed through the proper routes that the law enforcement agencies obtained it the right way. The exclusionary rule on the other hand becomes a big disadvantage to the police. As a police or a detective, you have to do more and that can reduce your speed in terms of getting all your facts and evidence together for trial. Defendants can use pre-trial motion to eliminate evidence or not being used against them if they think it does not apply to their particular case.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also claimed that trying to eliminate all arbitrariness from the death penalty was impossible to achieve. Justice Brennan questioned the majority of the court over their fear of widespread challenges to other sentencing decisions if they accepted McCleskey’s claims. Justice Brennan stated that these concerns should have no part in their analysis of the…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Smuggling Case Study

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It was found that the trial judge made a mistake in not adjourning the case to enable him to attempt to get representation. The trial judge then ensured that his trial wasn’t fair. Dietrich was given leave to appeal to have his case which could have been heard again in Victoria, although since he had already served his full sentence, the re-trial never proceeded and he was set free. Chief Justice Mason and Justice McHugh reached the following…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nonetheless, the trial court rejected that request based the reasonable cause the officers had to search him. Falling on Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) the state felt that due to Mr. Dickerson’s demeanor was enough for reason to perform a search. While performing the search the officers discovered a cellophane bag of cocaine. The respondent was charged and found guilty; however, the guilty verdict was appealed. Thus, the…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the criminal justice system, such things as consensual contact, detention and probable cause are important to for law enforcement. To know the difference between each could be difference between enforcing the law and letting someone go. According to Robertson and Wallace, consensual contact is defined as when an individual is not detained by the police and the police have not had any manner recommend to that individual and is not free to end the encounter and withdraw from. There are two types of detentions. Terry-Type Detention is defined as an arrest from a stop-and-frisk situation, while Temporary Detention is defined for questioning that is not considered to be an arrest.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, the evidence obtained should be excluded. The final issue was regarding the police filing a late and incomplete report to the court for the warrant. The court did not tackle this issue as it became controversial due to its decision to exclude the evidence obtained. The Supreme court upheld the appeal, set aside the conviction and acquitted the accused (R. v. Paterson,…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Herrings arrest was voided and the charges that where against him where dropped on the terms of his arrest was illegal and a violation of his fourth amendment. The police department cited that the officers involved in Mr. Herrings arrest was innocent any wrong doing and stated that it was in fault of Dale county’s for not maintaining up to date records. Ethics played a large role in this case that once the department found out they had made a large mistake they quickly tried to recodify the situation. The police department did the right in protocol but having the warrant not being up to date created a larger situation then it need to be. This goes to show communication and collaboration of the departments of criminal justice system are key to the success of each department.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hardy v. Cross: 565 U.S. _____, 132 S. Ct. 1626; 182 L. Ed. 2d 224 (2011) – The main issue in this case was that the witness A.S. was at the first trial but unavailable for the retrial or second trial. Therefore, when this happen the state decided to go ahead and use her previous statement or testimony made in the first trial as evidence. When this happened Cross told them that this violated his right of the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment because the state was unable to locate A.S. before the trial begin. Furthermore, he felt that the state did not make a good faith effort to find her in order for her to be in court for…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays