Claimant Aubrey Rouse began her employment on 11/3/2015 with the Ono Hawaiian BBQ Restaurant as a part-time Front Counter Employee. She began her in-house customer service training with Training Manager, Mr. Johan Liu, with Witness Celeste Gutierrez, who was hired at the same time as the claimant.
The claimant and Ms. Gutierrez stated that the training they were going through with Mr. Liu was “intense.” During the training, Witness Gutierrez noted that Mr. Liu “singled-out” and placed “undue pressure” on the claimant. She also noted that the claimant was “no longer her bubbly self when Mr. Liu was training her.” Witness Gutierrez alluded that Mr. Liu was “insensitive to the claimant’s mistakes.”
On 12-20-2015, the claimant stated she was at work undergoing her training with Mr. Liu when at 4:00 p.m. she had to use the women’s restroom, because she started getting nervous with Mr. …show more content…
On 12-20-2015, at approximately 4:00 p.m., Witness Gutierrez went to use the women’s restroom with the claimant and found the claimant looking at a “red rash that was all over her chest and lower abdominal area.” During their conversation, the claimant informed Witness Gutierrez that the rash was the result of the pressure and stress due to Mr. Liu’s “negative attitude.”
Supervisor Ms. Laura Celio claimed that she walked in on the claimant and Witness Gutierrez as they were looking at the rash that developed on the claimant’s abdominal area. Ms. Celio stepped out of the restroom before the claimant made contact with her and told her about the rash she had developed on her body. Ms. Celio stated she “believes that the claimant’s stress was “stress induced from Mr. Liu’s insensitivity towards the claimant’s learning curve.” According to Ms. Celio, Mr. Liu has an “overbearing attitude” with the claimant. She believes that Mr. Liu “singled out” the
The claimant and Ms. Gutierrez stated that the training they were going through with Mr. Liu was “intense.” During the training, Witness Gutierrez noted that Mr. Liu “singled-out” and placed “undue pressure” on the claimant. She also noted that the claimant was “no longer her bubbly self when Mr. Liu was training her.” Witness Gutierrez alluded that Mr. Liu was “insensitive to the claimant’s mistakes.”
On 12-20-2015, the claimant stated she was at work undergoing her training with Mr. Liu when at 4:00 p.m. she had to use the women’s restroom, because she started getting nervous with Mr. …show more content…
On 12-20-2015, at approximately 4:00 p.m., Witness Gutierrez went to use the women’s restroom with the claimant and found the claimant looking at a “red rash that was all over her chest and lower abdominal area.” During their conversation, the claimant informed Witness Gutierrez that the rash was the result of the pressure and stress due to Mr. Liu’s “negative attitude.”
Supervisor Ms. Laura Celio claimed that she walked in on the claimant and Witness Gutierrez as they were looking at the rash that developed on the claimant’s abdominal area. Ms. Celio stepped out of the restroom before the claimant made contact with her and told her about the rash she had developed on her body. Ms. Celio stated she “believes that the claimant’s stress was “stress induced from Mr. Liu’s insensitivity towards the claimant’s learning curve.” According to Ms. Celio, Mr. Liu has an “overbearing attitude” with the claimant. She believes that Mr. Liu “singled out” the