Fromm's Psychoanalytical Analysis

Improved Essays
Human beings are influenced by both their genetics and the environment they are raised in. There is a great deal of evidence for both nature and nurture, so why can’t we realize that both can have an impact? Throughout history, the homo species has had to fight for survival. We as humans, for the most part, do not need to fight for food and shelter, yet some of our animal instincts remain. It is not so crazy to say that humans are effected by nature and the environment they grew up in.
As we have seen in Shot in the Heart by Mikal Gilmore, a poisoned family environment can have an effect on children; as seen with Gary Gilmore. Mikal remembers his father beating the children and his mother quite frequently, and even beating the dog. As we have
…show more content…
The built in aggression is the animal instinct; it serves as the defense against a threat to us. So if someone were to attempt to hurt you, this is what would be triggered. The other, biologically non-adaptive aggression, Fromm puts as "…destructiveness and cruelty, is not a defense against a threat; it is not phylogenetically programmed; it is characteristic only of man; it is biologically harmful because it is socially disruptive; its main manifestations killing and cruelty-are pleasureful without needing any other purpose…though not an instinct, (malignant aggression) is a human potential rooted in the very conditions of human existence”. So, one of these aggressions is with us no matter what, and the other comes about when exposed to the rest of humanity. The things the Gilmore parents have seen and experienced effected the way they treated their family, and then the way they treated their children directly affected them as well. If Frank and Bessie Gilmore did not have a violent life themselves, there is an immense chance that they would have had a healthy marriage and healthy

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, Kae often shares Michelle’s emotional burdens by intervening in her conflicts with Justin through verbal and physical aggression. It creates a vicious cycle of abuse that is positively reinforced by other family member’s silence. When Kae intervenes aggressively, Michelle stands back which is an indirect support of family violence (Howes, Cicchetti, Toth, & Rogosch, 2000). Subsequently, reinforcing the behaviours of abuse and aggression and increasing the likelihood and severity of violence. Thus, creating a repetitive cycle that continues to build on the family…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parenting of Parents “Behind every young child who believes in himself is a parent who believed first.” by Mathew Jacobson. Positive parent-child relationships provide the foundation for children’s learning and to maintain that parents should have a good understanding between them. “My Father’s Life” by Raymond Carver and “The Rake: A Few Scenes From My Childhood” by David Mamet both author’s briefly discussed their parent’s relationship with each other and with their children. According to me that was not a healthy relationship in both stories, I strongly disagree with that kind of behavior with children and between husband and wife.…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They all develop a negative internal feeling that they continue to carry with them for the rest of their lives. They learn to improperly function in the chaos of abuse, and the negative feelings they carry inhibit them from creating or sustaining healthy future relationships. The characters are unable to process their emotions in a healthy way and the majority of the time their first reaction is to proceed with violence. Sammy Breedlove urges his mom to kill his own father when he sees them fighting in front of him. (p. 44)…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today’s research has proven that if you add environmental stress factors to a person, that this could alter the systems influenced by genes. It can alter the systems by creating developing diseases and different types of disorders such as panic disorder and depression (Carey & Gotesman, 2006). Another factor that came about contradicting the nature vs. nurture model was the advances in neuroscience. Neuroscience research demonstrates that certain areas of the brain are associated with a change of behavior (Carey & Gotesman, 2006). These new views of environment and genetics do not involve the notion of one or the other; rather it explains how both environment and genetics both come together and how they are associated with behavior.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our surroundings often shape our personalities and influence our individual qualities. In the nature versus nurture debate, in my opinion, I believe that humans are prone to adapt to the environment they're brought up in; meaning they contain a genetic disposition toward certain characteristics, however, they are revealed differently based on circumstances. I believe familial and social bonds, as well as academic and employment experiences most notably mold the person we become. As we all know, parents always want the best for us. They nurture us throughout our childhood and help us enter our adulthood well prepared.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For as long as one can remember, Nature vs. Nurture has been an argument that has always been debated. Some believe that people are the way they are due to their biological make- up. While on the other hand, others believe that people are the way they are because of their experiences and what they have been through. Humans are like a mold of clay, experience is what forms us. We need good and bad experiences to shape who we are.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nurture debate is one of the most hotly debated topics in history because of the fact that the line that separates the two is too blurry to really attribute all traits and characteristics to just one and not the other. In the modern scientific society the debate has almost been thrown out altogether because it is too general in trying to see its differences and not noticing that both nature and nurture interact together to produce human traits and characteristics. For example, someone with a family history of diabetes are considered at risk because diabetes can be hereditary, however if the person with a family history of diabetes is proactive and purposely strives to make healthier choices in life then he has a good chance of going through life without ever having diabetes. Neither nature nor nurture can be the sole determinant of all of the traits that belong to human beings. It is when we combine the two through science that we began to notice that the two interact with each other and in fact can vary depending on that…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Furthermore, violence in the family have an adverse effect on victims especially children. However, parents are unaware that…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The effects of a violent home is almost unpreventable towards teenagers. Though they suffer, it is possible to say that they will adopt the same violent behavior when they’re older. Violent households are one the most precise example of family instability. Margolis demonstrates in Teen Who Kill a variety of cases of teens that committed violent crimes and came from a violent family background. It is also said that teenagers don’t just get aggressive and violent out of nowhere but in fact learn it, “But many other scientists believe that violence is a learned behavior…teens who commit homicide have most likely been taught or have learned to respond with violence to confrontations or stressful situations” (22).…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there have been several discussions over people’s actions and the reason why they behave in such a way. For example, is it because of epigenetics or through the experience they endure in their lifetime. This debate has become to be known as nature versus nurture. Nature is the idea that the way humans act is because of their genes and family history. Nurture is the idea that humans act due to their environments and their social interactions (their experiences).…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature versus nurture has been a debatable issue since as early as the 17th century in psychology. The issue consists on whether humans are how they are because of their nature or because how they are nurtured during child development. In a 2007 article, McLeod contributes that nature is what humans inherit while nurture is environmental influences. Researches and psychologists who are strong in their position of nature are called nativists. Meanwhile, the researchers and psychologists who agree on nurture are called empiricists (“Nature vs. Nurture, 2007, para.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nature argument says that we are the way we are because we inherited it from our parents, through genes. Genes are a specific sequence of nucleotides in DNA or RNA that is located usually on a chromosome and that is the functional unit of inheritance controlling the transmission and expression of one or more traits by specifying the structure of a particular polypeptide and especially a protein or controlling the function of other genetic material (Merriam Webster’s Learner’s Dictionary, 2016), or the part of a cell that determines the physical aspects of a human, plant, animal, or living thing. The genes determines what our eyes look like, how tall we are, if the plant is harry or fuzzy, if it’s short and bright green, things of that nature, no pun intended. However, in this argument it hasn’t been proven that genetics directly influence the behavior of a person/subject.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Nature versus Nurture argument has been a complicated altercation for the past two centuries. While the ideas involved in the debate have existed for hundreds of years, the argument itself began in the 19th century. It can be considered one of the oldest arguments in history. Nativists and empiricists are the two names coined for those unequivocally declaring either nature or nurture as their standpoint. Nativists are for the nature side, which is in contrast to empiricists who are for the nurture perspective.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are times where the child is exposed to violence (Hughes, et al., 1989) that the child develops a tendency to treat their mother the same way. It can in some occasions lead to abuse caused either by witnessing events or by the other parent. The child can be pitched against the mother leading to the young parent being attacked by two fronts. On one side her abusive significant other and on the other, her child (Cunningham & Baker,…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever caught yourself acting like your mom or dad? Nature vs nurture debate is an interesting discussion about whether genetics or parenting has a bigger impact on our lives. Nature is genetics a pretty big thing to make the person we are today. But then we have another big part, nurture, which is the environment we live in. My opinion is that nurture is more powerful, because it is how we are raised and where we live.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays