I personally decided to work on the first three speakers. Before the speakers began their professor, Craig brown handed me a piece of paper. On the paper it was marked in almost a T-chart format. The top of the paper tells you the speech type, the semester, and class. Under that is where the T is formed, and on the top of the T it asks for the name of the performer and the time of their speech. The first column of the T-chart it says AG for attention getter, and the other side you can make notes. There is also a place on this paper to tally the number of sources. Mr. Brown explained all this, and because it was his class I used his method. Personally I would have preferred to just write down things my own way, but I am open to new experiences and obviously this has o for him. …show more content…
We discussed what went well, and what didn’t. We discussed their visual aids and if it helped them or not. I was also unaware up until that point that it this was the first speech given. This information shifted my initial thoughts on the performances as a whole. He said that he was pleased overall for their first go around and that already he has seen a major difference in some students from how they interact in class to their delivery of a speech. Mr. Brown then handed me a rubric to grade by, he said that that rubric can serve as the guidelines for grading, and that is more of the analytical approach that K-State has been leaning towards