Reasons other European rulers found the French Revolution so Threatening The French revolution was one of the most threatening revolutions in Europe, since it involved the aggressive French who wanted to take other countries borders in Europe. The war was threatening to other European nations because most of the European leaders were losing their territories to the French, the ruthless nature of the French armies spread terror among the European nations and most European nations perceived the French revolution as a mix of fear and revulsion. Therefore, they issued warnings, but the French refused to honor the warnings. People perceive the French Revolution as a period of both political and social upheavals that lasted for ten years in France.
…show more content…
The ascending of King Louis led to the disruption of the Catholic Church in France. The revolution led to a massive change of power from the Roman Catholic Church to the state. Most European leaders were against the move since they believed the Catholic Church was the powerful criteria of safeguarding their territory (Hunt 22). The Europeans nations were against the move to demoralize the Church operations in France. Additionally, the European leaders were also against the revolution’s move of taking the church’s land, they took 10% of the church land, and most people in the monarch believed the land belonged to the church and should not be taken from them (Hunt 22). Consequently, confiscating of the church’s land was a sign of despising the church according to most European leaders. The French government also demoralized the church’s operation by taxing them at a high rate. This led to the outbreak of religious differences across Europe as the revolution was against the Roman Catholic Church. They believed that the Catholic Church was used as the channel of exploiting people in Europe. They perceived the church’s ideas as barbaric and need to be abolished (De Tocqueville et al. 12). In other words the church no longer had the influence that it used to in France, and the French suppressed the church’s move to rule the nation using government …show more content…
Additionally, they also destroyed its structure and dependencies. The structure hindered the modern capitalistic structure where an individual is autonomous in wealth creation (Goodwin 12). The revolution led to the adoption of socialist policies where the resources belonged to the national government. The society began having different perceptions about life (Goodwin 12). The shady procedure of declaration of the human rights was the reason for the human demonstration against the rule. The administration comprised of ill-minded people who killed other people for political gain. Any government that wants to protect the rights of the citizens must keenly include the human rights clause in the constitution. Therefore, the French spelled the human rights instead of highlighting them in the constitution. In 1789, the Assembly availed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which comprised a statement of principles rather than a constitution with legal effect (Goodwin 12). The assembly, printed the constitution, which ignored the rights of the poor people. The various European leaders violated the rights of people during the French revolution era.
Lastly, The French revolution was observed as the main obstacle to modern history since it led to the global decline of the monarchies and republics replaced them. Therefore, the war extended
The ascending of King Louis led to the disruption of the Catholic Church in France. The revolution led to a massive change of power from the Roman Catholic Church to the state. Most European leaders were against the move since they believed the Catholic Church was the powerful criteria of safeguarding their territory (Hunt 22). The Europeans nations were against the move to demoralize the Church operations in France. Additionally, the European leaders were also against the revolution’s move of taking the church’s land, they took 10% of the church land, and most people in the monarch believed the land belonged to the church and should not be taken from them (Hunt 22). Consequently, confiscating of the church’s land was a sign of despising the church according to most European leaders. The French government also demoralized the church’s operation by taxing them at a high rate. This led to the outbreak of religious differences across Europe as the revolution was against the Roman Catholic Church. They believed that the Catholic Church was used as the channel of exploiting people in Europe. They perceived the church’s ideas as barbaric and need to be abolished (De Tocqueville et al. 12). In other words the church no longer had the influence that it used to in France, and the French suppressed the church’s move to rule the nation using government …show more content…
Additionally, they also destroyed its structure and dependencies. The structure hindered the modern capitalistic structure where an individual is autonomous in wealth creation (Goodwin 12). The revolution led to the adoption of socialist policies where the resources belonged to the national government. The society began having different perceptions about life (Goodwin 12). The shady procedure of declaration of the human rights was the reason for the human demonstration against the rule. The administration comprised of ill-minded people who killed other people for political gain. Any government that wants to protect the rights of the citizens must keenly include the human rights clause in the constitution. Therefore, the French spelled the human rights instead of highlighting them in the constitution. In 1789, the Assembly availed the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, which comprised a statement of principles rather than a constitution with legal effect (Goodwin 12). The assembly, printed the constitution, which ignored the rights of the poor people. The various European leaders violated the rights of people during the French revolution era.
Lastly, The French revolution was observed as the main obstacle to modern history since it led to the global decline of the monarchies and republics replaced them. Therefore, the war extended