“Looser lives” is a metaphor of the nonchalant, unresponsive, unaware attitudes demonstrated by the noble class’s lack of contribution or consciousness of the spewing financial turmoil. “Looser tongues” is used to portray the selfish, hurtful, oblivious, and inconsiderate language used by the noble class towards the Third Estate, such as Foulon’s comment about the citizens “eating grass”(Dickens 219);despite being a direct cause for the financial struggle and immense poverty conditions, the aristocrats still continue making selfish and inhumane remarks. Additionally, in Cause and Effect:The French Revolution, by Robert Green, while describing the financial downfall during the late 1700s, Green illustrates that “Even if all the subjects paid their taxes, their bite would be unevenly felt, The rich could easily afford to pay for their salt, but the tax would consume a greater portion of a poor family’s income”(Green 27). Not only did the aristocracy refuse to pay its share of taxes, but its intended price to pay was equal to that of the Third Estate, which represents the lack of respect and consideration it had for them. The “bite” is used as symbolism to convey the difference between a hypothetical “chew” from the aristocracy and the same amount pressured onto the income of the Third Estate, which was far more
“Looser lives” is a metaphor of the nonchalant, unresponsive, unaware attitudes demonstrated by the noble class’s lack of contribution or consciousness of the spewing financial turmoil. “Looser tongues” is used to portray the selfish, hurtful, oblivious, and inconsiderate language used by the noble class towards the Third Estate, such as Foulon’s comment about the citizens “eating grass”(Dickens 219);despite being a direct cause for the financial struggle and immense poverty conditions, the aristocrats still continue making selfish and inhumane remarks. Additionally, in Cause and Effect:The French Revolution, by Robert Green, while describing the financial downfall during the late 1700s, Green illustrates that “Even if all the subjects paid their taxes, their bite would be unevenly felt, The rich could easily afford to pay for their salt, but the tax would consume a greater portion of a poor family’s income”(Green 27). Not only did the aristocracy refuse to pay its share of taxes, but its intended price to pay was equal to that of the Third Estate, which represents the lack of respect and consideration it had for them. The “bite” is used as symbolism to convey the difference between a hypothetical “chew” from the aristocracy and the same amount pressured onto the income of the Third Estate, which was far more