Freehling's The South Vs. The South

Decent Essays
In The South Vs. the South, he ably displays just how Union numbers overwhelmed the Confederacy. Through study of the activities of two large geographical and population groups-upper South whites and middle South slaves-he demonstrates the importance of those people's actions to the ultimate Union victory. In order to strengthen his theory, Freehling also discusses the basis for the upper South's neutrality, Lincoln's tortured racialist path to the Emancipation Proclamation, and the arguments both North and South used for and against arming the slaves.

The first section of this splendid volume is devoted to what Freehling calls "white on white." For him, the neutrality of the border slave states made the Confederate war effort vulnerable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Isenberg Summary

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this section the author Isenberg argues that white trash moving at center of politics and played a notable role at center of the crisis. As the south secede from the union, further distinctions need to be made. As the author state that 1861, aimed to restore the virtue pedigree of the founding fathers. She said the union soldiers represented something much different than vagabond stock and swamp people. The confederates aim to prove that they were genuine offspring and rightful lineage of the first American republic.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Donald’s thesis for his essay is that the South did not lose the war because of a lack of economic resources or poor leadership, but because the people wanted to keep their civil liberties during the war. Donald’s explanation of how the Southern soldiers were unwilling to have their civil liberties cut short by the government is a key reason why his reason is the strongest. If soldiers did not approve of actions of their officers, they would not do what they were told. This is the base of poor leadership.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Racism Remains: The Confederate Flag In “How the South Lost the War, but Won the Narrative,” the author argues different focuses in which he clarifies how the ideas and thought of those of the south were changed from the fundamental cause of concern in regards to the Confederacy. Horwitz uses strong logical appeals when he discusses the Confederate flag´s status in the South. He includes many illustrations that note the absence of information from many people, who do not know so much about the Civil War, its purpose, or the Confederacy. The greater part of Horwitz argument is that his article is about the significance of the confederate banner to an entire region in The United States, whose thoughts are factually incorrect about the genuine…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1850 Compromise

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Southerners find themselves troubled by the 1850 compromise , but they also had a favor in the fugitive law act which granted them the right to catch escaped slaves in the north, the south and the north felt that it needed to overpower the other, with the repeal of the 1850 compromise, came the Kansas-nebraska act. This act allowed the people to decide whether the territory should be “free state” or a “slave state.” this provoked both the north and the south to send mass people to the territories in order to dominate the votes,…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcpherson’s For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War, interprets not what was previously expected from this novel, including the political and militaristic motivations, but rather the personal, and humanistic side of the Civil War. Slavery, being commonly interpreted as the highlighted factor concerning all things related to the Civil War, the assumption was that in all sincerity, this was the cause, sustentation, and motivation for War between the North and the South. But as McPherson bases his thesis on, with the letters he has chosen to do extensive reviews on, he shows what sustained the soldiers throughout the phases of war. The book is filled with constant references to Mcpherson’s sources, giving backing to his conclusions.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The South vs The South book review The book explores the civil war from the perspective of South vs South and impacts of discord with in the confederacy from pre-civil war until the end of the war. The Confederates ended up having to fight on three fronts. The Union from the North, as well as two different fronts internally the Black anti confederates and White anti confederates, each influencing the war effort in a different manner.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The essay, “Long-Legged Yankee Lies” was a surprising essay – not what I expected to read after reading James M. McPherson’s other works. The focus of this essay was to thoroughly explain one of the main interpretations of the Civil War – the “South’s Lost Cause.” The Lost Cause, as the Southerners perceived themselves after the Civil War, is explained in that the South was incredibly outnumbered by the North in both men and resources. The South perceived themselves as righteous men who fought for state’s rights, freedoms granted by the Constitution that cannot legally be infringed upon by the government, and the approval of the people with actions taken against them by their government.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shifting Grounds

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The American Civil War provides many avenues worth exploring, and scholars have approached the topic in a variety of ways. Paul Quigley’s book delves a little deeper than other authors’ and examines the idea of nationalism in the Southern states, and America as a whole during this time. Shifting Grounds: Nationalism and the American South, 1848-1865 offers many reasons for the South’s nationalism. However, it is clear that his book aims to define how Southerners notion of nationalism altered during the course of the Civil War, primarily through the idea that it moved outward, backward, and inward.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Introduction The American civil started purely as a military effort with limited political objectives especially for the white community. By early 1861 white citizen’s main aim of the fight was to preserve the union and as well maintain a democratic republic. The north fought for reunification whereas the south fought for independence during the initial stages of the civil war. However, the war changed between 1862 and 1863 as a result of emancipation.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic I chose to analyze from the book Taking Sides is rather the Civil War fought over slavery. This issue occurred in the 18th century and impacted black slaves and whites across the United States. Prior to the Civil War in the southern states (which declared themselves as the Confederate states when they separated from the United States) there were lands that included laborious work and the slaves would do the labor from sunup to sundown. The Confederate states desired to have more slave states and they declared secession from the United States. The Union noticed the Confederate states as a threat and a group of rebels who wanted more power but, the Union wanted balance and would continue to have power.…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book “Apostles of Disunion,” by Charles B. Dew, we are presented with ideas of secession, slavery and racism. The overall goal in this book was to prove the causes of the Civil War. We are given experiences and background from southerner, Charles B. Dew in order to justify the underlying reason for the cause of the War. During this time period of 1860-1861 there was a lot of talk as to what the real cause of the Civil War was, in which there have been many theories and hypothesis’ from historians as to what was the true reasoning was behind it all. Being a southerner, Dew is passionate about his facts, and researches to better support his argument.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Civil War was very misunderstood in that no one really knows the exact reason of why the war started. In Apostles of Disunion, Dew discusses topics such as slavery, racism, economics and state rights to push his point of view on the audience of why the war and secession began. Charles B. Dew wrote this book to inform the audience the secession came from not just the factor of state rights during the time between 1860 and 1861. Because Dew was a Southerner himself, he writes the book off of self-knowledge, experience others, and facts including people and their perspectives on the cause. The most common claim when it came to The Civil War’s cause is it beginning due to slavery and racism in the south; however Dew argues that the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the onset of the Civil War the South had numerous apparent advantages. Three of the advantages that seemed to have been an advantage was: presidential leadership, slavery, and a sound military strategy. During my essay I will explain why these appeared to be an advantage possessed by the South but ended up working against the South and also which of these three “apparent” advantages had the greatest impact on the South losing the war. Presidential leadership appeared to be an advantage that the South possessed because Jefferson Davis was seen as a better president than Abraham Lincoln especially in regards to war. Davis had a combat record in the Mexican War; which he was cited for bravery.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In David Herbert Donald's, “Why the War Came: The Sectional Struggle over Slavery in the Territories,” we learn the majority of Northerners and Southerners had much in common, they were working class individuals, toiling away to maintain their existence and support their families. However, they were ignorant of these similarities and instead focused on the stereotypes of the minority of the divided populations. The South viewed Northerners as “enemies of the South,” whose configuration and urban development mirrored the European countries and therefore were also “pestilent”(Donald). Additionally, Northerners were believed to be unjust and cruel. The commercial make up of the North rendered an image to Southerners of a money hungry, industrial…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The expanse of war in the South was much larger than in the North. Leaving many plantation destroyed and the cotton market that would not recover. The Civil War was viewed by the South as the “Lost Cause” (textbook, 452) justifying the defeat by moving on hoping for a better future. In turn, the white southern seen the African Americans as “adversaries” (textbook, 453) seeing them as challenging the superiority of white southerner. With so much destruction of property and the defeat to the psych of the southern people.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays