Threatening Speech

Improved Essays
Government Regulation on Threatening Speech With the rise of tension between the United States and the Middle East, every word spoken or drawing depicted is under pressure of causing harm. Is there a line drawn between freedom of speech and hate speech, for the sake of the safety and freedoms of our country? Can the government regulate communication that constitutes a threat to the United States national security, and if so, how? The United States government was put into place to serve the people and protect not only their liberties, but also their lives. The United States government can regulate violent provoking communication by encouraging a social stigma against harmful speech, and more clearly defining the law on hate speech, all while maintaining the freedoms of speech of U.S. citizens.
In 2015, two radical Islamic men plotted and attempted to wreak havoc on a Mohammed cartoon contest in Garland, Texas. The men wanted to avenge the blasphemous depictions of the prophet Mohammed by showing up to the contest with weapons. Before the men could actually do any harm, they were both shot dead by law enforcement. The American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), a known anti-Muslim group, sponsored the cartoon contest (“Two Shot Dead,” 2015).
…show more content…
They believe laws need be set in place to make these kinds of speech illegal. Though the two Islamic radicals were stopped before real harm could have been made, that does not mean other radicals will not be successful in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    United States. As PBS states, “The court famously analogized to man who cries ‘fire!’in a crowded theater … ‘the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic” (PBS). The effects of the court case are seen today when courts restrict speeches that cause a clear and present danger. This gives more authoritarian power for courts to interpret what is a “clear and present danger” further limiting the rights of the people. It is not to be confused with threat rhetoric that is not protected under the First Amendment.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anthony Lewis makes a reference in his book, Freedom for the Thought We Hate, of times in history when Americans were given freedom of speech but with very strict limitations: this was apparent even more so during a time of combat and national turmoil. As stated by Justice Holmes, “the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent” (Lewis, pg. 26). It is evident now and long ago that the government has had a tight grasp on what can be considered appropriate freedom of speech. There has to be boundaries set to ensure that there is still a sense of structure. At the time when America was at war with Vietnam, a time when the nation was at a venerable state, the government determined whether freedom of speech and press was destroying the nation or helping it.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning in British Columbia in 2008, two Muslim doctors each filed a complaint with the Tribunal, against the well-known Roger’s Publishing . The article published through Roger’s describes all Muslims as having serious ambitions for world religious domination, and that they will use violence to achieve this supposed goal. The Tribunal’s decision was to dismiss this complaint and I agree with their decision. Although I strongly believe there exists situations where freedom of expression must be limited, this is not of these situations. In this case, the article was merely expressing an opinion in a way that was not hateful or filled with contempt.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, people may argue no matter how hateful and disturbing the speech is, they should not have restrictions. Additionally, that those that were target should not take offence. They should just have the ability to ignore the speech. This is not always the case, however, some people really take offence to such words. People should not have fear when it comes to living in the United States, hateful and offensive speech should have some type of restriction.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Paulson 1). The First Amendment has also been criticized for its ability to allow the public display of offensive language. In fact, American Journalism Review discovered…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech can be debated on whether or not there should be boundaries to it or not and on what is considered freedom of speech. The First Amendment affirmed that "Congress shall make no law...abridging freedom of speech" but based on www.legal-dictionary.the free dictionary.com it states' All speech is not equal under the First Amendment. The high court has identified five areas of expression that the government may legitimately restrict under certain circumstances. These areas are speech that incites illegal activity and subversive speech, fighting words, obscenity and pornography, commercial speech, and symbolic expression'. On this information and amongst other I believe that freedom of speech is both restricted to a fault and abused.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tinker Vs Moines Essay

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A friend in my school got in trouble for talking about “guns” or “gay people.” Is this a case of “Hate Speech,” and should he have gotten in trouble? Freedom of speech, part of the first amendment, allows people to speak their mind without repercussions. This right was put into the Bill of Rights because the founding fathers wanted the people to be able to voice their opinions about the government. Today people want the same thing, to be offered the right to voice their opinions Easily offended people and so-called “Hate Speech” are attacking our first amendment right.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legal Policy Essay The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects freedom of speech, as considered being one of the most fundamental protection of the American way of life in a democratic society. However, it is also very clear that there are certain forms of speech are prohibited. For example, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic”; other limitations to freedom of speech include defamation, hate speech obscenity, and child pornography. Among all the situations with controversy, Constitution generally prohibits government’s regulation of speech, even when the speaker’s opinions are reprehensible to…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment states that “freedom of speech” is a fundamental right in the U.S. Freedom of speech is the right to, without fear of being restrained, express opinions and views freely. It is no surprise there is controversy surrounding this topic, as there are potential problems and threats that can arise due to someone expressing their opinion. At the same time, lots of people who defend this right say this is what keeps America unique compared to most other countries. The idea of restricting this right impedes the whole purpose of the freedom of speech right in the First Amendment. The majority of people firmly believe freedom of speech should remain absolute.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On June 12 2016 a horrific incident occurred in Orlando, FL which was motivated by Islamic fundamentalism. When the situation was finally neutralized there were 50 dead and 8 injured. The gunman name was Omar Mateen who was American born originally from New Hyde Park, NY. Coincidentally, Mateen, who was killed by officers at the scene was a Muslim who had a job as a security guard in the city of Orlando. Like in most of the terrorist attacks that have happened in recent years there wasn’t any reasons to have expected Matteen to engage in any type of terrorist activity.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Safe Space Research Paper

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Freedom of speech is one of the core ideals that are prided here in the United States. We can say what we want, and write what we want, and as long it is not perceived as a legitimate threat, receive no legal punishment. This freedom is one of the things that make the United States so great, for the ability to say what we want even if it conflicts with someone else is what allows us to be less ignorant and construct beliefs and opinions with adequate knowledge of all sides of a given situation. Lately, a number of people have shown the desire for safe space. According to the Safe Space Network, “a Safe Space is a place where anyone can relax and be able to fully express, without fear of being made to feel uncomfortable, unwelcome, or unsafe on account of biological sex, race/ethnicity, sexual…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlie Hebdo Attacks

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charlie Hebdo Attacks In Paris Recently Paris has experienced many terrorist attacks, however, some that stand out above the rest are the Charlie Hebdo Attacks. The Charlie Hebdo attacks were a series of attacks committed by two brothers, Saïd and Chérif Kouachi. These attacks have had a long lasting effect on France’s people and government.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fatihah Argument Analysis

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While reading the news an article had caught my attention, this was a story written by Sean Murphy in The National Post: “Muslim army reservist suing Oklahoma gun range for refusing him service after learning his religion”, 18 February 2016 (http://bit.ly/1Lod7FZ). This article focuses on a 29-year-old man, Raja’ee Fatihah who is an employee of the Oklahoma Department of Human Services who was denied access to a gun range because of his Muslim belief. Fatihah has filed a lawsuit, because of the business emphasizing Anti-Islamic belief as depicted with a sign posted on the business windows illustrating the establishment as a “Muslim-free” zone. Brady Hendersen the legal director has said, “Whether the sign in question says ’no Muslims’…

    • 1108 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many countries, hate speech has had laws set against it because they believe that it leads to violence, but in the United States it is considered a form of free speech so it is allowed with no limits. As part of the Constitution, freedom of speech is sometimes used so that people are allowed to express their opinions and say as they pleased. Many Americans want to ban hate speech from being a part of the First Amendment because they believe that it causes and provokes violence against others. Others want to defend their rights as citizens and be allowed to express their opinions with each other without being afraid that they might get fined or put in jail because someone didn’t like what they said and got offended. Hate speech should be…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Internet: A Soapbox Free For All. The internet is an incredible tool to have in this modern age, anything from reconnecting with old friends, communicating with others around the world, discovering new things and the ability to search anything at any time all at a click of a button. The internet also provides many ways to express peoples opinion, however, the power of free speech comes at a cost as it has been a controversial issue for decades. The issue of which if some opinions shouldn’t remain openly shared.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays