In an attempt to convert members of society that have grown familiar with the way of the past to a more structured future, many aspects of language are affected ranging from titles to public places. For instance, the character in which the story reflects goes by the name Offred, though this is not her born name. Instead, this name is gifted to her for being “of” her Commander “Fred”, property of him to someday harbor his child. In reference to her other name, Offred faces a battle in which she tells herself “it doesn’t matter, your name is like a telephone number, useful only to others” (Atwood 84) in hopes of convincing herself that through this seemingly unimportant renaming she is unaffected, and still uniquely herself. However, she cannot ignore the fact that she is indeed lying to herself in that “it does matter” (Atwood 84), for to lose her name is to lose her individuality. Through a name, one is viewed as a member of society, worthy of reference and remembrance. Yet with the new shift in language evident in this dystopian society, all senses of worth are revoked and one is diminished to nothing more than mere property. This lesser view of oneself provides the state with power, in that they are able to alter the ideals of its population through this new control because of others tendencies to look down upon those deemed lesser of worth. In comparison to the male members of society who are referred to by their military status, women are labeled by their roles to which they service men. By holding no more worth than an implemented job title, women are revoked of their rights to be of equal value as men. The submission to power by providing the ultimate sacrifice of their names eliminates any hope of maintaining individualism, therefore strengthening the control to which the state claims
In an attempt to convert members of society that have grown familiar with the way of the past to a more structured future, many aspects of language are affected ranging from titles to public places. For instance, the character in which the story reflects goes by the name Offred, though this is not her born name. Instead, this name is gifted to her for being “of” her Commander “Fred”, property of him to someday harbor his child. In reference to her other name, Offred faces a battle in which she tells herself “it doesn’t matter, your name is like a telephone number, useful only to others” (Atwood 84) in hopes of convincing herself that through this seemingly unimportant renaming she is unaffected, and still uniquely herself. However, she cannot ignore the fact that she is indeed lying to herself in that “it does matter” (Atwood 84), for to lose her name is to lose her individuality. Through a name, one is viewed as a member of society, worthy of reference and remembrance. Yet with the new shift in language evident in this dystopian society, all senses of worth are revoked and one is diminished to nothing more than mere property. This lesser view of oneself provides the state with power, in that they are able to alter the ideals of its population through this new control because of others tendencies to look down upon those deemed lesser of worth. In comparison to the male members of society who are referred to by their military status, women are labeled by their roles to which they service men. By holding no more worth than an implemented job title, women are revoked of their rights to be of equal value as men. The submission to power by providing the ultimate sacrifice of their names eliminates any hope of maintaining individualism, therefore strengthening the control to which the state claims