Freedom Of Action

Improved Essays
Show More
In general, freedom of action is a fundamental condition to do what a person wants to do, so people often consider it is necessary or important for free will. However, according to Harry Frankfurt’s definition of free will, that idea is wrong, and freedom of action is neither necessary nor sufficient for free will. Why he consider it as neither necessary nor sufficient for free will? And why this claim is important in his argument? I will discuss those two questions in this paper. First, why he claims freedom of action is not necessary for free will? In general, “X is necessary for Y” means “when Y is present, X is simultaneously present”. Therefore, if freedom of action is necessary for free will, when free will is present, freedom of action

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mind: R. E. Hobart's Conditional Analysis Of
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mind: R. E. Hobart's Conditional Analysis Of

    In the first section of Mind, R. E. Hobart presents a series of arguments in favor of compatibilism between free will and determination. In this essay, I will provide an analysis of his interpretation of power and discuss some of the critical parts of his argument. Finally, I will address two primary criticisms towards Hobart’s conclusion in favor of compatibilism using the conditional analysis of power. Hobart’s Conditional Analysis of Power: At the beginning of the article, Hobart establishes that he does not intend to tamper with the meaning of free will or determinism for it would be “unpardonable”.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ayer's Argument For Compatibilism Successful?
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ayer's Argument For Compatibilism Successful?

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis
    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis

    For the definition of free will to reign true, human beings must make actions at their own discretion even if it is the wrong choice, which I have previously mentioned is an arbitrary measure. Once humans are created to always choose the good thing, the element of freedom is…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Consequence Argument Analysis
    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Consequence Argument Analysis

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism
    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Paul Holbach's Argument For Universal Determinism

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Nothing But Freedom Analysis
    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nothing But Freedom Analysis

    Both books Nothing but Freedom by Eric Foner and Standing at Armageddon by Nell Irvin Painter both represent many aspects of history throughout their books. As well as exploring the events that have happened, they also exhibit many issues along with each area of history. Both of these together make these books valuable sources of information. Throughout the novel Nothing but Freedom by Eric Foner, Foner explores the major outcomes that the South of the United States experienced through the emancipation of slaves.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of D Holbach's Argument
    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of D Holbach's Argument

    In “Of the System of Man’s Free Agency” D’Holbach explains his argument that human action is determined by the laws of nature. He proposes that humans are part of the natural world and therefore governed by necessary laws, so they have no free will. On this essay I will argue that D’Holbach’s argument on motive is not a good one; I will explain the argument, present why do I think the argument fails and consider ways to defend the argument from my own attack. D’Holbach’s Argument D’Holbach concedes that “To be undeceived on the system of his free agency, man has simply to recur to the motive by which his will is determined; he will always find this motive is out of his own control. It is said: that in consequence of an idea to which the mind gives birth, man acts freely if he encounters no obstacle”.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Sider's Argument On Free Will And Determinism
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sider's Argument On Free Will And Determinism

    3. If determinism is true, then we could not have acted freely. To understand the argument, we must first know what “determinism” and “free will” are.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Freedom Vs Security
    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Freedom Vs Security

    First of all “freedom” and “security” are both vague concepts that are both equally important and therefore there is a trade off between them. They are both interconnected and neglecting one in the pursuit of the other can cause a problem in that society. This essay aims to highlight both the advantages and disadvantages of freedom and security at an individual and societal level. It will also incorporate use of significant examples in different countries relating to these concepts focusing on the Uk and America. Finally it will introduce the concepts of Liberalism and totalitarianism and how they apply to freedom and security.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will
    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    D Holbach's View Of Free Will And The Compatibilist Theory Of Free Will

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Debate Over Free Will Summary
    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Debate Over Free Will Summary

    Chapter nine in Problems from Philosophy by James Rachels and Stuart Rachels titled “The Debate Over Free Will” is about the three arguments over free will. They are Determinism, Libertarianism, and Compatibilism. The Determinism argument is, as Rachels states, that our actions are manipulated by forces we cannot control. The second argument Rachels presents is Libertarianism which states that some actions we freely choose and that we are also not made to do so. The last argument is Compatibilism and according to Rachels, it states that actions are both free and determined.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ted Chiang's 'Story Of Your Life'
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ted Chiang's 'Story Of Your Life'

    Audience: N/A 3) Thesis: Human Action is not dominated by our cognition but our free will. - Main Point of First Paragraph: He focuses on the idea of free will. Also, he provides examples that support his topic sentence; such as, the U.S and Russia's decision to continue to create nuclear defenses, knowing the…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Relationship Between Free Will And Determinism
    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Relationship Between Free Will And Determinism

    It can have argued, that more than this is required and that we are not free unless we are able to choose between the alternatives. But a counter argument to this is that as long as if you have said I would have done otherwise had I wished, then it was your own choice that prevented me from doing what I was willing to do, and what I did was of my own free will and choice. Frankfurt argued that what is distinctive about a person is their ability to reflect upon their desires And to decide to whether or not they want to have them. If we do what we want and what we wanted is something we take ownership of, then we have a relevant kind of…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Difference Between Soft Determinism And Libertarianism
    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Difference Between Soft Determinism And Libertarianism

    The philosophical question of free will has been debated for years and has spawned many theories, papers and never ending arguments. Soft determinism along side with hard determinism and libertarianism make up the three theories of free will. By focusing on the works of Stace and Cahn, I aim to prove that the idea of soft determinism is not an inherently flawed argument and that free will and determinism are compatible. In the argument of free will, soft determinism falls in the middle between hard determinism and libertarianism.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Free Will Vs. Determinism
    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Free Will Vs. Determinism

    Thus, actions must be caused properly in order for them to be free, and that the proper cause must come from inside the person. Compatiblists declare that the common usage of the word free will is essential for determining the correct definition. For example, say that in scenario one, I don’t get on the Internet for a week because I do not have any direct or wireless access to the Internet. In scenario two, I do not get on the Internet for a week because the FBI is tracking me, and I don’t want to get caught. Scenario one, is a case where I was forced to stay off the Internet.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings