Free Will Defense

Improved Essays
The existence of God has always been a topic of discussion. Many believe that God exists and some do not. Most reasons why there is an argument of God's existence is because of the problem of evil. The people that believe in the existence of God are called theist and those who do not are called atheist. Both have a thought of the existence of God, but atheist feels as if there is no proof. Since the free will defense is a very controversial topic, I believe that the free will defense is partially successful response to the problem of evil because it only justifies moral evil rather than natural evil.
Atheist believe that God does not exist; that, in reality, it is only a mind thing for those who do believe in God. In other words, God only
…show more content…
It is only a defense of moral evil. The free will defense is created so that God is not responsible for moral evil. It was created so that God is not a part of moral evil. God created free beings so that is cannot be held accountable for them. The beings of God believe that the world is better because of the choices. Without the existence of free will there would be no genuineness of goodness is the world. Everyone would be robots. The humans that may cause evil would be those who commits crimes or those who are mentally ill, don’t have sense and just don’t know any better. The world is not really better with free will because there are still both good and bad outcomes of human beings making a …show more content…
It only applies to one way of evil which is moral evil and it is partially successful. The reason it is partially successful is because they have a choice to do good or bad. Humans understand right from wrong and many choose to do the wrong thing which then creates evil. Mackie objections were pretty good and made sense because humans really do have a choice between being good or bad. I do not undermine the free will defense because although there are many objections that come along with it, it is still a test of faith. The world is not only evil because humans make it evil. It is not God’s doing. I believe that the free will defense was created so that humans had an excuse to blame their failures on. I believe that the problem of evil is still remained unjustified because it will always lead back to God regardless of how the argument

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Free will needs to be there in order for deeper goods to come from it. There needs to be a choice of good and evil so evil is not necessary. As for natural evil possibilities, the evil would be consistent with God. The natural possibilities of evil are explained through three premises. If God is omnibenevolent, then He seeks to give us the deepest of goods, if God seeks to give us the deepest of goods, He will give us free and responsible choice, if God gives us that choice, then there exists the natural possibility of evil.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the definition of free will to reign true, human beings must make actions at their own discretion even if it is the wrong choice, which I have previously mentioned is an arbitrary measure. Once humans are created to always choose the good thing, the element of freedom is…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mackie states that if something is red, then there must exist something that is the exact opposite of it, non-red. This leads to thinking that everything must have a logical opposite, which Mackie believes is only a construction of our minds. Therefore, there is no reason that God would have to create evil in order for good to exist. But, the theist could counter that God created evil to teach us what good is. The question then arises of this: Why so much evil?…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also brings up a point that free will doesn’t explain the natural causes of evil such as earthquakes, diseases and many more. These problems arise independently of human actions. He says free will doesn’t explain how God allows these “natural evils” to occur. He says that God allows these things to happen that doesn’t affect our free will. I think he has brought up some great points about free will however I believe that he would need to look into the Bible more, because God explains that he has a reason for everything that he does.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Exposition of the Problem of Evil In my paper, I will present the argument Weirob gives on the Problem of Evil, and explain Miller’s response to the Problem of Evil. I will explain why the character of Weirob argues it is impossible for an omniscient, omnipotent, and totally good God to exist simultaneously with evil in the world and go into detail about how Weirob believes that if God has these traits, He should be able to eliminate all evils in the world before they occur. Then I will give Miller’s defense to this argument which includes how God and evil can both exist in the world.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Defining something as large and complex as God is something hard to process. So for our purposes, we will call God the GCB or greatest conceivable being. A GCB can be agreed upon as a being who is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, and omnibenevolent, meaning all-knowing, able to do anything, able to be everywhere at the same time, and all-loving. For thousands of years, people have debated the idea of a GCB. This debate has led to countless wars and many deaths.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The problem of evil is an ancient theological problem that has been in existence for a long time. Evil is an immoral, benevolent behavior towards oneself, others, and nature. Unjust suffering occurs in one’s life because of the following: human beings are sinners, a way for God to test whether one’s faith will change and because nature is unpredictable. This is proven in the Hebrew Bible, the Book of Job, and in the “Christianity” chapter of Roy Clouser, the author of The Myth of Religious Neutrality. There are several answers to the ways evil can be solved, but none is satisfying because evil is a tradition that has been in occurrence.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the “Roundtable Discussion on the Problem of Evil”, Meghan Sullivan, Trent Dougherty, and Sam Newlands discuss the Problem of Evil for theism. All three people do not take the side of a theist or an atheist, but instead discuss the problem from a mostly objective view. The Problem of Evil is also discussed by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and William Craig in God? A Debate Between a Christian and an Atheist, where Sinnott-Armstrong argues from the atheist’s point of view and Craig argues from the theist’s. In this paper, I will discuss the points made in both sources to make my argument: God and evil can coexist because God may have reasons for evil existing, the main reason being to allow humans to have free will.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are several types of religions in our world. Each religion has their own views and beliefs on how our world was created. Christians believe the world and everything in it was created by God and God only. While Atheists believe there is no God at all, and they have different views on how the world was created. Christianity verses Atheistic Theism: they are two completely different worldviews.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existence of God, a topic discussed in both William Rowe’s and Robin Collins’ papers, but for two very different reasons. The argument of good vs. evil and the existence of an omnipresent, benevolent being such as God is a topic that many find very difficult to find answers for, and will continue to plague mankind for the rest of our existence. After reading the published works of Mr. Collins and Mr. Rowe, one may find it easier to formulate their own opinion. In the publication by Mr. Collins, he addresses the topic of atheism and theism in respect to physics.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genesis 1 And 2 Summary

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Book of Genesis chapters 1 and 2 tells us that God created the world by his spoken word. God created the world in 7 days, in which is why we have 7 days in the week. God created the heavens, the earth and everything that lives. He made humankind in his image, and gave them charge over the earth. On Day 1, God created light from the dark chaotic world.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evil exists because we chose it to. We, as free agents can choose between right and wrong. Through this we can justify our actions. What kind of world would we lead if everything was already decided for us and all we would have to do is perform it? God, although knows how we will choose, plays absolutely no role in our process of choosing.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since free will is nothing more than an idea of being able to control our on actions, assuming we will take ownership of moral responsibility. These actions could be determined by cause and effect. The problem associated with free will, is that it is subjected to many different concepts such as, sin, guilt , responsibility and judgements associated to making decisions for yourself. When a person feels guilty about a decision they made, subconsciously they know they have probably made the wrong decision. I believe natural intentions are proof that free will may have some truth to…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    God Allows Evil Essay

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I believe that God allows evil to exist for reasons that we do not understand, but I also believe that he was not the one who created it. I believe that God created man, and that man created evil. According to the bible, God The reason as to why God allows evil may never be known, but others have arrived at the conclusion that God must want to teach people a lesson. Another theory is that he literally cannot or will not do anything to stop evil from happening because he gave us free will. Regardless as to why he allows it to happen, the bible states that he will judge Earth’s inhabitants and he will at this time banish evil forever.…

    • 1801 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays