Difference Between Hard Determinism And Free Will

Improved Essays
Have you ever wondered if you’re changing your own fate? Most believe that they do. This is what is called free will. The opposing side of free will is hard determinism. Hard determinism is a theory that everything that occurs in the universe is entirely determined to be that way, due to causation. Hard determinists believe choice does not exist, free will does not exist, and randomness does not exist. When you woke up this morning and picked out your clothes for the day was that free will or determinism? When you chose what you would eat for breakfast was that free will or determinism? A free will believer would say they made the choice to wear the outfit they picked because they could have picked anything they wanted or maybe they based …show more content…
This is something that they say couldn’t be predetermined. A determinist would argue that thought, and say it was because of causation that you chose that outfit. Something happened before to you in the past to make you pick the outfit you did. Maybe the last time you wore that outfit someone complimented you on it, this could be the causation that made you decide to wear it again. It’s the same thing for your choice of breakfast. A free will believer would say that you had the freedom to pick anything you wanted in your kitchen and you freely chose what you ate, but on the other hand a determinist would say you made the choice because of a previous situation. There are three theories of free will and determinism. The first is hard determinism this is the theory that human behavior and actions are wholly determined by external factors. This means humans do not have genuine free will …show more content…
If god has already predetermined our life, which has been said in the bible numerous times, then how would free will exist? God has already mapped out our lives. He knows everything when we will be born, if we marry, have children, get sick, and ultimately when we die. This should put any god believing free will believer to rest on the existence of free will. This is when another theory comes in to play, compatibilism
. Compatibilism also called soft determinism at times. It is the middle ground between hard determinism and libertinism. This theory says that people are free but defines freedom differently. Compatibilism is the belief that every person can choose according to his or her greatest desire. In other words you can ultimately make any choice you want, but what you want is determined by moral nature, what your heart and mind

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Additionally, Agnew cites three different types of determinism: soft, hard, and indeterminism. Hard determinism refers to no choice nor freedom while soft determinism deals with no…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Determinism is a philosophical idea that attempts to place all events that occur as inevitable as they are predetermined by previous events and the laws of nature. However there are many who came to be known as indeterminists who reject the notion that free will is absent from the process that causes events to occur. Indeterminists believe that there are possible events that have different probabilities of occurring based on human beings free will. Then Chisholm’s view of the agent-casual theory presents humans as always going through a decision process when making an action that leads up to an event they work through their desires in first and second order volitions and then they act. These actions are free from previous events and cannot…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No action we choose to partake in is determined by us, but predetermined and forced due to…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fate, Destiny, and You: Assessment Paper In class we watched the film The Adjustment Bureau and in this film there was many instances that challenged free will with determinism. It’s very hard to not think about fate and destiny. There are many ways to answer what exactly our destiny is.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If determinism is true, then it is impossible for a person to have free will because a person that could not act otherwise than he did does not act freely. This view is also known as incompatibilism. However, according to a soft determinist, one who believes that humans are determined and still free, the first mistake about the argument of incompatibilism is that freedom and determinism oppose each other. Soft determinists believe that determinism conflicts with freedom because of the misconception of freedom.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Psychologically speaking, as humans, we are wired to think that we have the freedom to act and do based upon our own self judgment. For simplistic reasons, let’s assume that this “freedom” is analogous to free will which is a philosophical idea in which to act freely is to have multiple open futures and possibilities, or to be able to choose between many different choices. Determinism is the belief that every event (including action, choices, and decisions) is the inevitable result of a causal chain of events. In other words, a choice with an action (A) is the inevitable result of an earlier action of an earlier choice. This principle presents a problem for the concept of free will.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second form of determinism is soft determinism, also called “compatibilism”. Compatibilists are half determinists, half indeterminists. They believe that all events are results of causes. Thus, they agree with hard determinists on that.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Soft determinism was coined by philosopher William James. Soft determinist believe that human freedom and determinism are compatible positions. Soft determinist are also known as compatibilists who believe in combatilism. They feel that the determinism argument is true, but they refuse to give up on the idea of human freedom and responsibility. The problem soft determinists face is the idea that life and our actions can be both predetermined to an extent but also be factored by freewill and…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The premise only states that if you accept determinism, you must accept that all events are caused. Premise (2) follows from our definition of free will. If we believe that every event is caused, human choices are no different. Our choices are also caused; therefore, if we accept that all events are caused by previous events then we have no free…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This means that we as humans have freedom to respond to our circumstances and that reaction may be different then another person who faced the exact same circumstances. With free will each person has control over their own actions and their actions are voluntary. Determinism means that behavior is caused by heredity…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Determinism says the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Some philosophers have taken determinism to imply that individual human beings have no free will and cannot be held morally responsible for their actions. Pereboom and Holbach are two of those philosophers. His first part of his argument is that we humans have no control over our birth or physiology.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophical question of free will has been debated for years and has spawned many theories, papers and never ending arguments. Soft determinism along side with hard determinism and libertarianism make up the three theories of free will. By focusing on the works of Stace and Cahn, I aim to prove that the idea of soft determinism is not an inherently flawed argument and that free will and determinism are compatible. In the argument of free will, soft determinism falls in the middle between hard determinism and libertarianism.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A determinist might say, your choices the night before led you to wake up in that room. A determinist would go even further back, saying your parents, and your grandparents, were alcoholics therefore it was in your genes to become an alcoholic. Making it inevitable that you would go out on a Tuesday night, consume too much alcohol, and wake up in a locked room with no knowledge of where you are or how you got there. But the determinist would argue that it is not your fault because this was inevitable, it was pre-determined because of how you grew up. The larger fault in the determinists’ argument is what I call “the…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays