Free Speech Vs Hate Speech

Improved Essays
Free Speech vs. Hate Speech
The First Amendment, adopted December 15, 1791, states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” and is the basis the United States has used for hundreds of years to claim freedom of speech for its citizens. However, it has been discovered that this cannot be an absolute freedom without endangering the public. Most people will agree that the decision to outlaw yelling “FIRE” in a crowded theater is practical and permissible. The question then becomes: What more should the government
…show more content…
For the purpose of this discussion, hate speech is defined as “speech or conduct that negatively targets a group or individual based on race, religion, or sexual orientation” [4]. The hate crimes referenced are crimes based on biases held about to the same issues. Fighting words are considered words that directly cause violent behavior of the individual to which they were addressed. These definitions are slightly different, depending on the legislation looked at, but these are the key points that are ever …show more content…
Hate crime statutes made their debut in the late 1980s and continued to get their start through the early 1990s. As of 2010, “There are laws in 31 states that allow a victim to file a civil lawsuit for injuries caused by a hate crime” [5]. There are four categories of hate crime laws, (1) laws that actually declare the act to be a crime, (2) laws that increase the penalties for crimes committed due to hate, (3) laws that provide grounds for a victim to issue a lawsuit, and (4) laws that require records be made of all hate crimes. Usually, when discussing hate crime, it refers to the second option, harsher punishments for those who are proven to be committing a crime because of hate. This seems redundant by nature because most people would figure that harming someone or their property does not testify to affection. The laws seem to emphasize if you hate a group of people for a specific uncontrollable detail, you are more

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The issue over removing Confederate statues has sparked many debates and emotions throughout the U.S. Hate speech stirs emotions, so do these statues. This made me think of the debate over if hate speech is protected by the freedom of speech. Hate speech is a terrible thing. But, it needs to be protected.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering The Victim’s Story” Mari J. Matsuda addresses the topic of hate speech, and the legal rights surrounding it. She argues for the implementation of legal restrictions on hate speech. She makes the theoretical arguments that hate speech can be a causative factor for legitimate harm to individuals; she justifies the need for restrictions on hate speech by citing the various harm that can be conducted by individual that possess such speech. She claims hate speech can cause: psychological effects, internalization which in turn leads to low self-esteem, violence and discrimination, alteration in the mind of others and a feeling of not being protected by a governing body or exclusion from a community.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bill of Rights I. First Amendment The first amendment of the United States is more complex than just “Freedom of Speech” but it is one of the most important amendment sin the Constitution. The first amendment guarantees the liberties of speech, religion, press, assembly, and to petition to the government to right potential wrongs. The freedom of speech clause also does not allow citizens to utilize their freedom of speech to initiate harm on others such as yelling “fire” in a crowded movie theatre and there is not fire. The religious clause implies that the government may not interfere with any personal religious worship nor may the government inflict any religion onto the people.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Hate Cries Prevention Act (HPCA) defines hate violence as a violent act committed to a person due his or her gender, race, color, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, and disability. (Iyer, 22) In We Too Sing America, Deepa Iyer states that the multiple “root causes that lead to hate violence” listed earlier are the “racist and xenophobic attitudes and beliefs we hold about one another”. (Iyer, 23) Iyer goes on to affirm that these root causes for hate violence is only reinforced or even exacerbated “by governmental policies, political rhetoric, and media narratives.”…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    California case, Robert Cohen was arrested after wearing a jacket printed with “F THE DRAFT” to protest the Vietnam War at municipal courthouse, then he was sentenced 30 days in jail for violating the state ordinance which prohibits “maliciously and willfully disturbing the peace or quiet of any neighborhood or person by offensive conduct”. It is obvious that the state law was unconstitutional permissible since it violated Cohen’s rights of free speech. Since the act was considered as an offensive speech of profanity to convict Cohen, however, the fact that certain words are offensive doesn’t make them fighting words. Cohen was simply expressing his feeling and opinion toward the war and the draft, but not engaging in any threatening conduct with this speech. The state has no power to punish him for the content of his message showing no malicious intention or behavior of disobedience to the draft.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American today tends to believe that we are in era where changed has been made. Yet we have heard in the news that violence has enlarged since Donald Trump was announced the President of the United States. We are in an era where white supremacy doesn’t hold back their opinions or expressed it through actions. Some of the examples would be of people who are target based on religion or race. In this paper I would establish what hate crimes is and who is the victim, who is affected in drug arrests.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Personally, I believe in a loose interpretation of the First Amendment. The United States of America was founded with the understanding that certain freedoms would be protected for all of the country’s citizens and that promise should continue to be enforced today. However, in order to ensure the safety of all citizens, there are some examples of scenarios in which the First Amendment may not entirely apply. A popular example is shouting “Fire” in a movie theater (or any other public place for that matter) when there is not really a fire. Because of the risk of chaos that could occur at the mention of a fire in the area, not everyone’s safety can be ensured if it is pointed out.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Crime Vs Hate Crime

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Racial violence and the politics of hate. Race & Class, 54(4), 5-21. doi:10.1177/0306396813475981 Iganski, P., & Lagou, S. (2014). Hate Crimes Hurt Some More Than Others: Implications for the Just Sentencing of Offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(10), 1696-1718.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under the Constitution the First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The right to speak freely archived in the First Amendment is a sacred assurance, as well as an inevitable piece part of the democratic government and independence, which are key qualities in our society. “Censorship,” according to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, “is an almost irresistible impulse when you know you are right.” That is the reason why an American citizen 's entitlement to free speech should be held as the highest excellence and any restriction of the right to speak freely should not be permitted,…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mending the First Amendment The first amendment of the constitution is often regarded as the most important amendment within the constitution. It includes our freedoms of “religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition” (Sidlow and Henschen). This amendment entitles us to protection of our rights away from government interference. It “forbids Congress” from prohibiting our first amendment rights in any way (Cornell University).…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hate crimes is listed as the number one priority of our Civil Rights program. As defined from FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) Program, hate crime is a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias. It is also defined as a criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in a part by an offender’s bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity. Hate crimes happen often enough in the society that it has a multitude of myths and speculations. Hate crimes can include single-bias incidents, racial bias, religious bias, sexual-orientation bias, ethnicity/national origin bias, disability bias, and much more.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Fighting Words?

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Fighting words are phrases used in order to instill fear in another individual, or cause someone to act out in violence after hearing these words. “Fighting words are a speech that in not protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because it is likely to cause violence by the person to whom the words are spoken.” (Hall, 2015 p. 194) You also have to consider the factors with fighting words.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hate crime is an offense, usually violent, motivated by the prejudice of one specific status a single individual holds, i.e., sexual orientation, religion, gender, ethnicity, ect. These crimes are driven simply because of the hatred one person feels towards another. An individual is targeted because of something about themselves a single person or group of people do not approve of. Hate crimes are the highest priority of the FBI’s Civil Rights program and each year an estimated 1,200 crimes are reported, however, the number is most likely higher due to underreported cases. In 2012, an astonishing 5,796 were committed.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many countries, hate speech has had laws set against it because they believe that it leads to violence, but in the United States it is considered a form of free speech so it is allowed with no limits. As part of the Constitution, freedom of speech is sometimes used so that people are allowed to express their opinions and say as they pleased. Many Americans want to ban hate speech from being a part of the First Amendment because they believe that it causes and provokes violence against others. Others want to defend their rights as citizens and be allowed to express their opinions with each other without being afraid that they might get fined or put in jail because someone didn’t like what they said and got offended. Hate speech should be…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The freedom to speak your mind. To worship. To pray without interference. To protest in peace. These rights are still “protected” by the First Amendment.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays