The Role Of Autonomy In Health Care

Improved Essays
In the last several years, the physician-patient relationship has shifted dramatically from a less Hippocratic based paternalistic approach, to that of a relationship centered on respect for patient autonomy; this new approach integrated informed consent and shared decision making. Autonomy remains a much debated, but central idea in both western medicine and medical ethics. Autonomy for our purposes in medical ethics, can be defined as the right of competent adults to make informed decisions about their medical care. The debate ultimately surrounds what role patient autonomy should play in medicine. Some believe that patients should be seen as fully autonomous persons, as they know better than anyone else what is good or bad for them. While, …show more content…
Autonomy in health care operates under the understanding that patients are competent or of “sound mind”, have not been coerced into the decision they are choosing to make and overall are well informed prior to the decision. Essentially patients are free to use their autonomy to make decisions regarding their health based on informed consent, and those in the medical field are obligated to follow through regardless of their feelings on the matter. For example, Autonomy is central to the debate centering around euthanasia; as those who are advocates of euthanasia in health care argue that banning or prohibiting such an act, limits an individual’s choices, specifically, their choice as to how they will die and when they will die. Essentially the ban on euthanasia results in a limit on patient autonomy as a …show more content…
There are good reasons for respecting the autonomy of patients. Patients who are informed about their condition and who understand their treatment options and the reasons behind these treatment options are more likely make decisions that are genuinely better for their overall wellbeing. That being said, those who are given all the information are more likely to follow courses of prescribed treatment. Even when patients are given a terminal prognosis, being honestly informed, gives them the opportunity to make peace with themselves, with the life they have lived, and to get their affairs in order. Moreover, choosing to withhold such information from patients leads to distrust in physicians and ultimately leaves patients less inclined to trust physicians when the news is not bad. Despite the positives and the value in patient autonomy that I have highlighted above, critics still remain. Many who criticize patient autonomy make the argument that a physician’s obligation is always to do what is best for the patient. Critics claim that by offering full information and allowing patients to make crucial decisions about their health care, they may be allowing patients to make unwise choices. Obviously patient autonomy cannot possibly be applied to all, specifically young children, severely mentally incapacitated persons, and those who are unable to make

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The relationship between a physician and their patient is one that should be composed of understanding and trust, as the intent of both parties is a shared value alleviating pain and overall content. However, there is uncertainty in the medical community when determining who “knows best” – the patient or the doctor. Is the patient entitled to the knowledge their doctor has concerning their case, or should the doctor be conservative in their explanations in an attempt to spare the patient’s psychological turmoil. This debate is exemplified in the article “Beneficence Today, or Autonomy (Maybe) Tomorrow” as the course of treatment for the patient, Monica, is reliant upon the doctors’ decision to either withhold information about the severity…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt, each of these men agree that competent patients have this privilege; however, they do not agree on when the patient has the right to use this privilege. Cowart’s argument favors healthcare professionals allowing patients to use their free will at any given moment regardless of the positive or negative outcomes of his or her decision. I agree with Cowart’s argument pertaining to the rights of patients. Cowart discusses how patient autonomy…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A conflict between a physician and patient on the course of treatment is a common topic that arises in bioethical conversation. This case explores the topic of paternalistic choices dealing with patient autonomy and when it is ethically reasonable for a physician to intervene and decide as to whether an individual is competent to make decisions about their own care. The patient in the case, Mr. Howe was asked to make a lifesaving medical decision while in duress and not fully understanding the procedure and the potential outcome if he refused. In this case I believe the physician made the correct decision to intubate Mr. Howe against his explicit instructions not to. The physician made a determination that the patient was not accurately expressing his wishes as if he was of sound mind.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dax Cowart Case Summary

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Final Project – Compiled Case Studies Janisha E. Rosa HSC312: Ethics of Health Care May 2015 Professor Flynn Case Analysis: Paternalism vs. Autonomy - Dax Cowart 1. Ethical Dilemma ISSUE: Should Dax Cowart’s physicians continue to treat him against his wishes? 2. Primary issues related to the identified dilemma health care decision making capacity; autonomy and the right to refuse treatment 3.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The phrases active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide raise many concerns in today's society. When speaking of euthanasia and suicide, the term autonomy quickly comes into question. Autonomy is the right of having self-determination, self-control, or independence. Many factors arise in certain circumstances when determining if active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is morally acceptable. Daniel Callahan and John Lachs both have opinions on the role that autonomy participates in active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal autonomy is a right that people can self-govern themselves. The fact that no one other than the ill patient can determine if death would be better than their own personal suffering means that they alone should be able to make that decision. A survey was taken by terminally ill patients from the beginning to end of their illnesses. It was revealed that only four percent wanted to end their life at the beginning stage, but at the point of being bed ridden the percentage rose to thirty-seven. () It is evident that some patient’s suffering is too much to tolerate.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supporters of physician assisted suicide believe that the procedure is a good thing and should be legalized. There are two arguments that exist in support of assisted suicide. One of the main arguments for assisted suicide is the patient’s right to autonomy (Haigh and Neville 3213). The right to autonomy…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A Vulnerable Population

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Identification of Controversial Health-Related Issue Affecting a Vulnerable Population Across the United States, thousands of patients are diagnosed with a terminal illness and given a prognosis of less than six months to live. In 2015, it is projected by the American Cancer Society, that about 600,000 people will die from cancer (ACS, 2015). The term terminal illness refers to a disease, infection, or illness that is incurable resulting in death. Residents of California who are facing terminal diseases do not have the option to end their lives when they decide it is too painful to continue living. Treatments can cause unbearable painful and deteriorate the quality of life, and patients report they lose their sense of autonomy.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Informed consent is the process by which the treating health care provider discloses appropriate information to a competent patient so that the patient may make a voluntary choice to accept or refuse treatment” (Bord, Jessica De. et. al). By knowing this information, the physician can make it clear to the patient…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If a person has a right to life, liberty, and happiness, then an individual should have the freedom to make important decisions regarding his/her life. Everyone has a right to life which means that a person’s right to live should be protected. If a patient who is terminally ill and mentally competent no longer wants to live, then the patient’s right to receive assisted suicide should be protected. Others should not interfere with a person’s right to make that decision because they would be disrespecting a person’s freedom. Moreover, patients have the right to not receive any medical treatment, and a patient can decide not to receive any treatment even if the treatment can save the person’s life.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Under the principle of respect for autonomy, patients have the right to seek, accept, and ultimately refuse care. The physician that performs the procedure against the patient’s will and without informed consent is also a key player. Respecting the patient's autonomy means that the physician cannot impose treatments. At a public policy level, medical professionals have an opportunity to be a voice of reason by pointing out when legislative and regulatory measures intended to be safeguards, interfere…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Specifically, the article states that the principle of autonomy is not only important, but it is very easy to undermine. To start, informed consent is considered as fulfilling the principle of autonomy. However, as stated before, patients can give their informed consent without understanding anything about the treatment. As such, the author states that this is a form of negative consent, where the patient cannot make a fully autonomous choice because they cannot understand the possible outcomes. This is further complicated by the fact that patients can have negative and positive beliefs.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a variety of different aspects which can play a role within a certain nation or cultures take on patient autonomy. Informing a patient of their true cancer diagnosis is a fairly recent practice. However currently it is legally required in the United States for physician- patient communication to be characterized by a accent on patient autonomy. However Japan holds a very distinct religious and cultural past. The aim of this study is to compare the outlook toward ethical decision making and autonomy issues among academic and community physicians and patients of medical center outpatient clinics in Japan and the United States.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Henrietta Lacks

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On October 4, 1951, Henrietta Lacks died, but her cells, HeLa, continue to live today. The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot (2010), discusses Mrs. Lacks life, her cells after she died and how her cells are still living. Success has been reached by advancing medical research of multiple vaccinations, such as a polio vaccine (Skloot, 2010), but Henrietta and her family have been disrespected by not being reimbursed for Henrietta’s contribution to medical research. Henrietta’s autonomy has been violated multiple times throughout her life.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays

Related Topics