Freakonomics Book Report

Improved Essays
“Freakonomics” is not a book containing any main characters, major events, or solutions. It is a book talking about incentives and what drives people to act the way they do, the incentives society provides don't always provide the results we want or expected. One of the main points that book talks about the difference between correlation and causation. If one cannot realize the difference between these two then they cannot tell if the incentives are working as planned or they are working for a completely different reason. When all these factors are considered it provides a framework for not just understanding the world as we perceive it but understanding it as it really is.

This book has made me realize that things don't always work
…show more content…
The researcher learns that the main reason that many join the gang is not because there aren't other opportunities available but the feel as if it's the only occupation in which they have a chance for real advancement. The young men who deal crack know the risks, in the first four years that they are selling, there is ¼ chance that they will be killed. The most disturbing part is that selling crack provides less than minimum wage unless you are an “executive” member of the gang. “The top 120 men in Black Disciples gang represented just 2.2 percent of the full-fledged gang membership but took home well more than half the money”(93). In this chapter we continue to learn that incentives are rarely as simple as we understand them. This book enlightened me on the real nature of incentives and causation. This book should not be read or analyzed in english classrooms because it can’t be, it has no main character, setting, or theme. The book club process was enjoyable and i would be open to doing it again outside of school. The book club process allows us to think about a book and not just accept it’s word as fact which is important when reading any

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Even though, Boyle refuses to say whether or not his efforts to help homies and homegirls have been “successful,” as he is merely following his faith. He certainly have no doubt by the end of the book that Boyle has made a huge impact not only on the personal lives of the countless homies he has encountered, but also the communal lives of all who those who have ever lived in his parish. Boyle built up Homeboy Industries entirely around the notion of giving gang members a “second chance.” Boyle’s gang-outreach initiatives could be helpful in other parts of America. the Homeboy Industries’ model that should be enacted around the nation.…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levitt and Dubner create a speaker devoid of emotions except for humor in an effort to enhance their credibility by avoiding emotional manipulation. The speaker’s primary role in Freakonomics is simply as a teacher, who provides his class, the audience, with all of the facts and evidence required to draw a specific conclusion, leaving the students to reach that conclusion on their own. By encouraging the audience of teenagers and adults to come to their own conclusions using the provided data, the speaker enhances the meaning behind the revelation. For example, when the speaker states, “” he establishes his own trustworthiness in allowing the audience to think for themselves rather than forcing his opinions upon them (Levitt and Dubner). Additionally,…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Abortion laws will always be seen as a controversial subject. In Freakonomics, Steven D. Levitt and John Donahue discuss the correlation between crime rate and abortion laws. They dismiss other factors such as gun control, proactive policing and increased incarceration rates and instead focus on the theory that Roe v. Wade played a greater role in crime rate fall. In 1973 Roe v. Wade ruled anti abortion laws unconstitutional.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Week Three Freakonomics Analysis Question The authors of Freakonomics (2006) relate a gang of drug dealers and how their operation works to a tournament or a winner take all market. They imply that a person starts on the bottom of the chain like an athlete or game player would in a sporting tournament, then they work their way to the next level of the game by winning or beating all of the other opponents on that level. The player would eventually work their way through all of the levels until they are the top athlete or the boss of all of the other gang members. A street level drug dealer may be willing to accept low pay and poor working conditions if he were to believe that after he put in his time and played his way to the top he would…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As an international college student who grew up in a society where cocaine, crack, and other similar drug are almost unattainable, I was impressed by Dee Watkins’ book, The Cook Up, A Crack Memoir, and had a glimpse of how underrepresented people lived in drug society. The society that I lived in give me a safe and non-violent environment that is so much different from Watkins’. Watkins was born in an society where drugs abuses, people dying on street were fairly common. In his memoir, he majorly narrated his life at the age around 20, and how he stepped into the illegal drug business, and then how he pulled himself out of the business. He cooked crack and sold them to his neighbor, and hired crews for selling the drug for him as well.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner deal with highly controversial topics in Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, their structured approach reveals the pair’s awareness of the sensitivity of their material. After introducing a data set, the authors offer possible causes before disproving them and then verifying that the final, contentious explanation numerically supports the data. Levitt and Dubner’s carefully organized build-up to a conclusion allows the pair to avoid offending many readers by undermining opposing arguments and appealing to the audience’s sense of reason. The book’s fourth chapter, “Where have All the Criminals Gone?”…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Residential Burglars

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is considerably obvious that these individuals are committed to the street life and street culture. Elijah Anderson gives us much insight on street culture and its dedication to impulsivity, command for respect, commitment to illicit lifestyle and denial of those who do not adhere to the code of the street. The hustler’s major purpose for using the money they obtained from burglaries was to fund a lifestyle that was centered on illicit drug use, sexual promiscuity and expensive clothing, cars and jewelry. All of which they felt was necessary to command respect on the street. “Simply put, much of their offending was directed toward obtaining the funds necessary to sustain activities that constituted the essence of street life.”…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Asserting that ethics can manipulate the way people interpret situations, in their 2009 novel Freakonomics Steven D Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner identify the cause behind many socioeconomic events, contrasting seemingly unrelated topics, and then connect unthought of events to more commonly known ones, bringing out their correlation. Their purpose is to expose how the world really operates, with great influence from moral beliefs, by stripping layers from the surface of modern life in order to encourage readers to explore the hidden side of real world situations and not to take the information given without taking a moment to dissect it. They establish an objective tone with their audience of economically curious people who may also wonder…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The underground community has long since caused issues dealing with economics. Underground economy, meaning illegal drugs or items sold without being taxed. Freakonomics written by Dubner and Levitt, stresses the idea behind how the underground economy and incentives work in that organization. This book directly focuses on males within the drug trade, though in the more recent years, with the rise of women 's equality, there has been a shift in the balance of a male dominance in the drug economy. It has come to light that women have obtained a new and rising role in black market trades, mainly focused on the dealings of cocaine, and with this rise it has also been made evident that women 's incentives may have distinctions from that of their…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The complete lack of resources in school or of jobs in the workforce push these young men to commit crimes for basic needs such as money for rent or other necessities. When the world has only provided opportunities which are illegal, the costs of the punishment are paled by the monetary benefits of selling drugs or the heightened safety in preemptive action of gangs against rival gangs. This theory about crime connects directly to the theme of social-bond theory, which is also one of Rios’ major focuses in this book. Overall, feeling alone, unprotects, criminalized, and without hope for a better life, the young men in this book find their own solutions to their…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levitt And Dubner Summary

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The chapter starts off by how to ask a good question. Levitt and Dubner say asking a good questions doesn’t mean it has never been asked before. The term “conventional wisdom” means is a theory, but sometimes means isn’t always true. A professor who talked to a group of college students about the number of homeless people who die each year said, “45 homeless people die each second- which would mean 1.4 billion homeless people die a year” (Levitt and Dubner, 2009). This is an example of conventional wisdom because the speaker gave a statistic, but was a very misleading.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The social class statuses of the “Saints and the Roughnecks” gangs shaped their opportunities and response from the community in several ways. Many of the differences between the two groups were the result of their financial status but other differences such as their visibility and demeanor had an impact as well. While both groups were not that much different from each other, they were treated differently by the community. The Saints and Roughnecks is a story based on research that was completed by Mr. William J. Chambliss whose area of research is criminology and sociology of the law. Chambliss establishes rapport with two groups or gangs of boys, assigns names and follows them around gathering information regarding their behavior and it’s…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freakonomics Summary

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The connection between a teacher and a sumo wrestler probably has not crossed your mind. Have you ever thought about how real-estate agents are similar to members of the Ku Klux Klan? These are not connections you would usually make every day, but they are the basis of the book Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything: co-authored by University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and New York Times journalist, Stephen Dubner. In the book, they ponder the true explanations…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Is Freakonomics?

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Freakonomics” by Stephen J. Dubner and Steven levitt was something that i was interested reading when i seen the title on Mr. Seal’s shelf because, I am in Economics, and I wasn’t too sure if I would understand everything in that class, so I thought maybe reading a book about economics in my english class could help boost up my knowledge for econ. This book was a great book, I finished it within a 3 week period, reading not every night, but catching up on the nights I missed out on by reading a little more. This was a book where I didn’t need to tell myself “Okay read one chapter tonight and one chapter tomorrow night.” Freakonomics was too interesting for me to stop reading, sorta like that TV show “The Real Housewives of Atlanta” Once you…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the book Freakonomics the authors, Stephen Levitt and Stephen Dubner, takes a novel approach to studying economics, sharing its most interesting research. First they begin with the topic of correlation and causation. According to them correlation means, “A relationship exists between two factors—let’s call them X and Y—but it tells you nothing about the direction of that relationship. It’s possible that X causes Y; it’s also possible that Y causes X; and it may be that X and Y are both being caused by some other factor, Z. ” (8). One the other hand, causation is when one object affects the other object.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays