In the textbook, on page 201, it says, "Today in the sciences, books are usually either texts or retrospective upon one aspect or another of the scientific life." I believe that all textbooks, articles, and anything else that scientists published are quite complicated to assume that they are readable which means they can sound good while you read them but afterwards, they are not. I, however, think that it is impossible to disagree with something you just read because it sounds good and it seem like they know what they are talking about.
The sources that I found has a lot of information about my topic but when it comes to Frazier's interview, I don't think that it will give me that evidence that I need anymore because he doesn't know a lot
The sources that I found has a lot of information about my topic but when it comes to Frazier's interview, I don't think that it will give me that evidence that I need anymore because he doesn't know a lot