Considering that the first monster had killed two people, one being direct and one indirect, the chances that this other monster would become a killer is quite likely. This could either be a natural instinct among creatures that are created so hideously, or it could have been a fluke that would transfer over due to one influencing the other. The overall increased risk of danger in creating the second monster due to the first is an issue with this idea. Lastly, the promises made by the monster could be broken. This includes the promise to live far away, not even harming animals. This could be broken by the monster just flat out breaking it or it could be done through the new monster not agreeing with the terms that were set up before she was even
Considering that the first monster had killed two people, one being direct and one indirect, the chances that this other monster would become a killer is quite likely. This could either be a natural instinct among creatures that are created so hideously, or it could have been a fluke that would transfer over due to one influencing the other. The overall increased risk of danger in creating the second monster due to the first is an issue with this idea. Lastly, the promises made by the monster could be broken. This includes the promise to live far away, not even harming animals. This could be broken by the monster just flat out breaking it or it could be done through the new monster not agreeing with the terms that were set up before she was even