The Argument Of Nature Vs. Nurture

Superior Essays
Anyone who has taken a psychology class knows the argument of nature versus nurture, a long debate about how one’s biological DNA or one’s environment affects a person’s development. The basic concept of the argument is whether it is our gene’s fault for our actions or external factors that influence behavior. Recent debates show that one side of the argument does not weigh more heavily in development than the other, but rather the two are equal in shaping a person and their characteristics. With this insight, how does one person’s brain compare to another when they both have committed the same crime? Is there a way for one person to justify that their actions were strictly from an uneven brain chemistry and that they should be allowed to get off scot free? The answer is no. Brain science should only be a small factor in court, but should not be the reason a criminal is able to walk.
The concept of brain science and human testing has always been a controversial subject. The first major argument began in the gothic era with Galvani’s electricity experiments that inspired the novel Frankenstein and is still seen today in more
…show more content…
For example, if their parents were serial killers, the child would most likely develop the same deformities in their brain that lead to traits similar to their parents. In the show Dexter, Dexter’s father shows his son that his brain is the same as the famous serial killers. In the show, Dexter is a serial killer who goes after criminals as a way of karma for their actions. However, this fact does not render any of the children or their parents a not guilty verdict for not being able to control urges and see the oncoming behaviors of malicious play. Since nature does play a part in the formation of one’s being, the accused should be able to recognize what is happening and be able to change their life for the better. This why services like rehab and counseling

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Sharhea, in her article, “Serial Killers: Nature vs Nurture”, claims that serial killers begin their killing because of certain changes in their environments. Sharhea states, “First I will start with the nature theories, where many scientists believe brain damage, genetic disorders and/or other disorders/diseases create the problem. The frontal lobe is considered to be responsible for human behavior that makes us stable and have adequate social relations… When the limbic brain is damaged, it may account for uncontrollable aggression Among the many serial killers who had suffered head injuries are Leonard Lake, David Berkowitz, Kenneth Bianchi, John Gacy and Carl Panzram, who as a child, had some sort of head infection”(Sharhea). Sharhea implies that an environmental altercation to the brain may result in negative effects on the behavior of an individual which in many cases leads to the act of murder. She further provides examples of murders that have had physical injuries to the brain itself.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are too many accounts when people try and use the insanity defense, or unable to stand trial due to mental incompetence. “For Ripstein people are held to be legally responsible for actions in order to uphold the framework of freedom and security for all. One person’s freedom would be compromised if others could be excused from liability” (Levitt, 2013). These individual’s should be held responsible for their actions. By having this Genetic Neural Sonar testing, it would help alleviate 60 percent of these cases because they would be prevented with the help of this testing.…

    • 3209 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature-versus-nurture issue is the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused by nature or nurture. Now the connection of the overproduction of synaptic connections and their subsequent retraction, or pruning with the nature-versus-nurture issue is that they both are heredity. Heredity means the passing of physical or mental characteristics genetically from one generation to another. Also, the connection is that the environment comes to play when it influences the timing and course of pruning. When it comes to the nature-versus-nurture issue, environment comes into play and so does the physical characteristics.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Discuss the dichotomy of "nature" vs. "nurture" as a cause of sexual orientation. Nature vs. Nurture is an ongoing debate on whether or not a person was born gay or if it was learned through experiences and upbringing. Biology, genes, and being born gay are seen as choices that oppose the possibility of change in sexual orientation.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that even though alcoholism is known to inhibit brain function, it does not justify the fact that a drunk driver should not be held culpable for killing someone ("Can Genes And Brain Abnormalities Create Killers?"). Ericson points out the extent to which people can use brain disinhibition to combat their responsibility to their crime. In reality, every one has a relatively different brain; therefore, they can argue that any slight difference in the structure or function on a brain scan could be used to question the culpability of the defender. The criminal justice system must establish what types of brain deformities would be considered to inhibit a defendants moral justifications. Additionally, when brain scans are presented in a trial, the jury could look at the evidence in two ways: the defendant is held less accountable and, therefore, can have a lesser sentence or the defendant is a danger to society because he or she has no control of his or her actions.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the arguments favouring the ‘nature’ debate, it remains a deterministic approach that assumes that psychological traits are predetermined and programmed whilst virtually ignoring non-genetic factors involved in human development. Even when evolutionary psychologists acknowledge the influence of the environment, they reduce its role to that of a trigger of the predetermined developmental instructions supposed to be encoded in a person's genes. Furthermore this essentialist way of thinking creates naturalisms therefore ceasing to require social or political explanation, becoming a constant that can be relied upon and taken for granted. It also asks to question the role of stepfathers or people adopting children that are not their biological…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Biological theories of crime argue that a crime is caused by a genetic or physical effect that an individual may be suffering from. On the contrary, psychological theory posits that a crime is caused by the personality defects that a person suffers in early years, mostly from the influence of family or individual factors. The relationship between psychological theories of crime and biological theories is that they both derive significance from the conditions within the human body and mind (Cullen and Chouhy, 2016). Therefore, the characteristics of criminals such as poor self-control, aggression or lack of empathy may possess a biological aspect that makes them behave in a manner considered to be antisocial or committing a crime. Essentially,…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nature Vs. Nurture Debate

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Twin studies have been an important element in scientific research considering the distinct genetic likeness between identical twins (Dovey, D., 2015). Identical (monozygotic) twins have the same heredity due to the fertilization of one egg by a single sperm, and fraternal (dizygotic) twins develop separately from two ova fertilized by separate sperms, hence with different heredities (Holzinger, K. J., 1929). Even though researchers have recently concluded a combination of genetics and environmental factors is the answer to the Nature vs. Nurture debate, the debate continues in several aspects, such as the formation of diseases, behaviors, and intelligence (Allen, D.M., 2012). Intelligence anticipates future success in life and greatly impacts brain development. Samples…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The question of why individuals would kill their fellow human being is always a debate. There has been a long-time belief that criminal behavior is something that is innate, where the argument of nature versus nurture arises. It is possible that it leans more in one direction than the other or can even be a combination of both. Additionally, criminal offenders have often reported being emotionally unstable. There seems to be less consideration for a possible predispose of criminal behavior due to a head injury that resulted in brain damage.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criminal Mind Criminal behavior is caused by many factors in the brain and body of the criminal. Some of these include: a gene pool that is predisposed to crime, imbalance in brain chemistry ,or lesions in the brain. Based on a study made by Dr. Simone Shamay-Tsoory, a professor from the University of Haifa in Israel, and his colleagues concluded that violent behavior originates from damage to the frontal lobe. Also, a study in Finland discovered that genes are associated with violent crimes.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where are two people with practically identical genes found? In identical twins of course. The most scientifically accurate way of testing the impact that genetics have on a person’s beliefs, actions, personality, and other characteristics is through rearing a set of identical twins in two separate environments. Identical twins have the potential to become exactly the same person because they have almost the exact same genetic makeup. Discovering this was a total breakthrough for scientists studying the “Nature vs. Nurture Debate”.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the greatest debates in psychology is the debate of nature versus nurture. This debate is concerned with behavior being inherited (i.e genetic) or acquired (i.e. learned) characteristics. Many scientists believe that damage to the areas of the brain, like the frontal lobes or the limbic system, may be the cause of killing sprees. While others consider a profile of their past physical and mental abuse while growing up. The nature vs. nurture debate can be so difficult to determine because one’s environment can impact one’s behavior.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction From the first breath we breathe we take the last breath of life, we are constantly changing and developing. The life span development is a process of how humans grow and change throughout their daily lives. However, the human development is instantly related to the principles that drive the life span development while being able to manage the long term substance.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The argument of nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and one of the largest controversies on whether our influences come from our genes (nature) or environmental factors (nurture), and how it could affect our behavioral, appearances, development, and our personality. These two play a big role in the human development. This argument will always exist on what is said about the human development. Scientists have not been able to sort this argument out and decide which one rules out the other.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nature versus Nurture "Nature versus Nurture" is one of the oldest argument of all time in history and it still continues until now. Beckett (2002) defined the nature as qualities and characteristics which are transmitted to humans directly from parents through genetics. While, nurture could be explained as "all external factors surrounding human beings from birth to death" (Beckett 2002). Wherefore, scientists confirm that the factors which influence human behavior are subdivided into three aspects.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays