Frank Tannenbaum's Slave And Citizen

Great Essays
Prior to the authoring of professor Frank Tannenbaum’s book Slave and Citizen most scholars believed that slavery in North and South America was the same in Ancient Greece and Rome along with the Middle Ages in Europe. However, one important difference made slavery in the Americas stand out and it was the enslavement of Africans and indigenous populations. Professor Tannenbaum’s thesis argued that Iberian laws regarding slavery and the teachings and principles of the Catholic Church made slavery within the Spanish and Portuguese colonies more humane when compared to North American slavery. Tannenbaum specifically argued that these Iberian laws and Catholic dogma allowed slaves to keep their humanity, have the right to children, and have the …show more content…
In the engenhos, sugar plantations, of the Brazilian captaincy Bahia the physical conditions were “extremely poor: lack of clothing, inadequate housing, poor nutrition, harsh discipline and cruel discipline”. The main purpose for slave masters and Lavradores was to make as much profit as possible from the harvesting of sugar cane and the production of crystallized sugar so they would extract all the work possible from a slave. In order to maximize profit the slave masters and the Lavradores would cut costs by buying inferior clothing, homes, and the least amount of food possible for slaves. The exhaustive labor along with the poor living conditions slaves were exposed to meant “Bahian slaves suffered from high mortality and low fertility” rates. The low fertility rates can be explained by the fact that for slave masters slaves were expendable and could easily be replaced by importing new slaves from West Africa. So, while technically Professor Frank Tannenbaum’s claim that slaves had the rights to families was correct most planters in Bahia “saw no reason to stimulate stable families to promote natural growth of the population”. The risk and cost of raising children to bolster the future ranks of slaves exceeded the …show more content…
However, the slave masters and Lavradores were more motivated by profit when making decisions rather than any Iberian laws or Catholic teachings that pushed for a humane form of slavery. The slave system of Latin America and Brazil was just as if not more abusive and exploitative than any other because of the poor conditions slaves were subjected to, the existence of fugitive slave communities away from white society known as quilombos or mocambos that looted white settlements to sustain themselves, and the rights and perks afforded to them were only given to them to help aid the health and endurance of the slave system. The slave system only existed for the profit of white European planters and was carefully crafted to keep the loyalty and quality of work from slaves while continuing to exploit

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Therefore it could be theorized that Virginian slaves worked harder as they knew their hard work meant they would be treated better. Being raised into slavery could also have meant being raised with the idea that even as slaves hard work lead to better treatment and better livelihood. Many West Indies slaves or slaves straight from Africa were not wanted because they were often not as hard of workers, to the point of being considered “refuse” slaves. Therefore, slaves from Africa and the West Indies were kept to a minimum, so the slave trade in America stayed inside America more than in the West Indies or South…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The slaves in the Caribbean Islands often died and brought forth the argument that slavery in the United States was “better” than in the Islands. Slave owners primarily only cared about what was more profitable in both areas. Slavery was viewed as just a business to them. This was a very harsh statement to me because it is hard to understand how a human being, can see this type of treatment to another human being as acceptable. It states that slave owners had two theories on how to treat their slaves.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, he wouldn’t have written the positive good speech if no one wanted to terminate slavery. John wanted to convince the people who were against his views to know why slavery improved America and that the race from central Africa had never been in this great condition before slavery came along and that if it they were to make two races equally then America wouldn’t be the same. He wanted to point out that the north and south both benefited from slavery in many ways. The north depended on the south for most of their goods and without them there would be no survival in the north. Not to mention, slavery is what made cash crops and kept the federal government going since it gave them revenue.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Africans were so successfully enslaved because they lacked a united African nation, they were not prepared for the militant power the Europeans possessed, and the Africans were guilty of selling each other into slavery as well. According to Dr. Emma Poulter, “The basis of the relationship between Europeans and coastal Africans was purely one of commercial interest.” there was no moral forethought before these exchanges. To keep the enslavement of Africans profitable for Europeans in the New World, they had to establish an institution that worked against black people to keep them oppressed. Evidence of these action can be seen in the Maryland Doctrine of 1638 and the consequences of Bacon’s Rebellion in 1676. The institution put in place was race based and would leave Black people politically, economically, and socially devastated for generations to come.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was not beneficial to the poor whites. It made no economic or moral sense for them to support it. But as home searchers, overseers, and slave patrol they could enforce the system of slavery while simultaneously reinforcing that they were of some “value.” Poor white men were not the bottom of the chain-- because no matter how much they lost-- they would always have their…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, ‘free negroes’ were particularly prone to the skin lesions not as commonly seen in slaves. The slaves who were prone to mischief did not do so intentionally, rather they were victims of this disease. Ruffian believed that the mental inferiority of slaves "prevented high grades of intellect” even in the North where they had access to schools and colleges. Fitzhugh justified the institution of slavery with his idea that the slaves were overgrown children in need of constant supervision and care from the plantation owners. He believed that their inability to take care of themselves required the White plantation owners to help the Blacks through the institution of slavery.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Slavery

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The great nation of America was founded on the principles of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness as unalienable Rights. However, it is ironic that some of the nation’s Founding Fathers i.e. Thomas Jefferson, owned slaves themselves despite their common belief that all men are created equal. Originally, slavery was not a major institution in the colonies, but by 1860 the Slavery had become such a profitable industry that the value of enslaved blacks exceeded the value of all banks, railroads, and factories combined . During the nineteenth century, the South greatly profited from the trade in comparison to the North, especially due to the introduction of the cotton gin.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This led to the emergence of slaves as the backbone of European society. Without slaves white men had to work, but with slaves they lived comfortable lives. This caused the next time generation of slave owners to not know how to work and they would be fully reliant on slaves. They would know cruelty more than they knew how to work (Warman 81). Lucy Mayblin points out in her article “Never Look Back: Political Thought and the Abolition of Slavery” the following about slavery.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In My Bondage and My Freedom, Douglass claims slavery not only affected him, but also slave holders, and the non-slave holding whites. I agree with Frederick Douglass because the slaves had their freedom/rights taken away; the slave holders were turn into cruel people, and the non-slave holding whites had less job opportunities. The slaves were victims, because they had no…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As slaves were taken from their homeland they would take passages on land to the seas. Slaves were brutally beaten, and fed very little food as they were chained together. Doesn’t sound much different in the way we hear about people being sold and treated in our modern world today. Africans would also sell their people for economic gains, but there are also a few misinterpretations of what one might think about Africans selling slaves to Europeans. One assumption is that Africans sold their people because the European traders forced them to.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays