The most persuasive appeal to the reader’s ethos might be the author himself. If an individual were to read The Future of History with no background information on Fukuyama, he might likely conclude that Fukuyama is a liberal writer because he argues against traditional conservative beliefs such as near friction-less free markets and small government. Yet the audience that the essay is intended for, academic political theorists and economists, know that Fukuyama is a famous conservative thinker who is one of the intellectual founders of the neo-conservative ideology which dominated the foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration. The fact that a well-known conservative thinker is arguing against certain core conservative beliefs adds a sense of credibility to his essay that could not be mustered if a liberal thinker were to pen the
The most persuasive appeal to the reader’s ethos might be the author himself. If an individual were to read The Future of History with no background information on Fukuyama, he might likely conclude that Fukuyama is a liberal writer because he argues against traditional conservative beliefs such as near friction-less free markets and small government. Yet the audience that the essay is intended for, academic political theorists and economists, know that Fukuyama is a famous conservative thinker who is one of the intellectual founders of the neo-conservative ideology which dominated the foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration. The fact that a well-known conservative thinker is arguing against certain core conservative beliefs adds a sense of credibility to his essay that could not be mustered if a liberal thinker were to pen the