Fourth Fallacy In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
The fourth fallacy in Twelve Angry Men is Poisoning the Well which translates to Ad Auditorium in latin.
Poisoning the Well fallacy is when you make a statement that already shuts down any argument that your opponent might bring up
The character in Twelve Angry Men that used this fallacy was The Yankee.
The Yankee said “You can’t change my mind if you talked for 100 years”
By The Yankee saying this he committed a Poisoning the Well fallacy because he is saying that no matter what anyone in the room says he is not changing his vote. He is already saying that the arguments that anyone will say have been discredited because he has already made up his mind. Instead of saying this The Yankee should have said “I am pretty set on my decision of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose uses a variation of situational Irony to convey the message that men will often change their mind and use previous biases to form opinions. One example of Rose's use of this irony is when juror 10 begins to speak badly about the defendant, and how the kids like him "don't even speak good English" (37). Juror 11, the juror who speaks English as a second language, then proceeds to correct juror 10's grammar. Rose is showing people here that they should not judge people by any previous biases we may have- like language barriers as shown in this example. We would expect that juror 11 would not have known English well enough to be able to correct a native speaker.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film, “12 Angry Men”, is about a group of twelve jurors who have to discuss and thoroughly analyze a case. These jurors have to decide whether the eighteen-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty or not. However, there isn’t much evidence, besides two eye-witnesses and a knife. So, the group of jurors have to come up with their own reasons as to why they believe the boy is guilty or not.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Purpose Behind “Twelve Angry Men” The purpose behind the play “Twelve Angry Men” is to address the realities of what happens on a jury behind closed doors. The author, Reginald Rose, wants readers and viewers to realize being on a jury is not easy and requires careful thinking throughout the decision-making process. Each jury member represents the types of people that serve on an actual jury. Rose does not want to sugar coat the true actions that occur when serving along with strangers.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title Do think democracy is a good or bad thing? We’ll in this reading there is two different perspectives on democracy. The two authors that will be in this reading is Reginald Rose and Sara Holbrook, they have two different perspectives on democracy. What do you think about democracy ? Is it fair or not?…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The play "12 Angry Men" by Reginald Rose is an all-time American classic. The play is about a jury set to decide the fate of a teenager who allegedly stabbed his father to death. These 12 men have this young man's life in their hands and things get heated quickly when not everyone agrees that the boy is guilty. The predominant theme of the play is prejudice, defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary as "an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge.' " Seeing the 12 different jurors with different life experiences interpreting the same evidence and supposed facts of a case make the play a fascinating read.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Truth In 12 Angry Men

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In the film, 12 Angry Men, I believe that the most important question about life that was addressed was the difference between belief and truth. At the beginning, when the jury first started the discussion 11 out of the 12 believed the man on trial was guilty of first degree murder. Throughout the course of the discussion, many things that would make a huge difference in the case were pointed out and brought to light. For example, the actual number of seconds it took for the old man to walk to his door. People believed that the man could easily have done it in 15 seconds, but when it was acted out it was proven to take over 40 seconds, therefore the jurors initial belief was proven incorrect and the truth was brought to light.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Analysis

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    THE BACKGROUND The motion picture 12 angry men was put on air on 29 July 1957.The field of motion picture was performance and inscrutability. The manager who directed this motion picture was Sidney Lumet. This motion picture was a story of in relation to a young man who according to the grapevine brought into being blameworthy and accountable of executing a murder of his own member of the clergy that is his father. That boy was of eighteen years of age, that is a teenager, who belonged slum vicinities.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Characters with widely different personalities and beliefs create a number of diverse and tense relationships among characters in the play 12 Angry Men written by Reginald Rose. Some may argue that bringing past prejudices into a case where a man's life is at stake is unwise; however, this is inevitable. Each person has different morals and knowledge, as well as bigotry and prejudice, this provides for heated and opinionated debates. Would you really want a jury of people of only the same background? Having different people makes others question their own opinions and ultimately makes everyone deliberate for quite some time until a final verdict is reached.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These are some of the fallacious arguments I found in the script of the film “12 angry men”. (1)There were 11 votes for guilty. It’s not so easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first. In this argument he is not sure that the boy is guilty or not he just want to talk, before making any decision.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the movie 12 Angry Men, a young man is on trial for murdering his father. The movie opens at a point in the trial after the witnesses have testified, and the prosecution and defense have had their say. It is now up to the twelve men of the jury to decide the fate of the defendant. In this particular case if he is found guilty, he will be sentenced to death by the electric chair. The jury go in to the jury room, sit down, and take a vote.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Roles In Twelve Angry Men

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Roles] Each person has a role to play in society, whether it be a small role or a big role. One can look at roles as a drama script for actors. In the Twelve Angry Men movie, each jury men had their own roles to play during the decision-making process, depending on their personality. Starting from the first jury man, the foreman plays an active role in guiding the whole jury group towards making a decision. He leads all the jury men through the discussion with guidance without any biases.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men (1957) exhibited the power of an eyewitness, the characteristics of the defendant, and the power of group influence that affects the jury. Throughout the film, the reliability of the eyewitness was questioned. There were two eyewitnesses in the movie, the old man, who lives in the apartment below of the crime scene, and the old woman, who lives across the street. According to the film, there is a possibility that the eyewitnesses misinformed the jury about the crime scene. Eyewitnesses may not be as reliable as they are thought to be.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Validity This argument is not valid if you interpret the thesis an meaning that owning a gun will never in any circumstances make you safer. He quotes a study saying that there was a case of a woman using a gun in self defense. He also says they are not more effective than other forms of self-defense, but that means they are still better than no self-defense, therefore able to make you safer. Because of this the absolute statement of owning a gun does not make you safer this argument can not be taken as valid.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fallacy is a kind of error during arguing or reasoning anything. Fallacy may be created intentionally or unintentionally, majorly identified fallacy involved in argument some are in explanation definition etc. Some people also define fallacy as failure in providing sufficient proof for a believe. Just after voting when Three said to Eight that” That person is dangerous killer you were at court and heard all the things.” Here this point is fallacy (cherry picking or begging the question) because he is only looking at points which are favor instead of looking at suspected points.…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays