Ten people lives are in danger due to a nuclear war in the United States of America. There are many shelters available; however, not all shelters will survive through the nuclear war. The only shelter that is able to survive though the nuclear war has enough resources to support six people for the year. But the shelter’s capacity is unknown, which there is a chance that the ten people can fit in the shelter. The ten people are the bookkeeper, his pregnant wife, black militant, famous historian, Hollywood starlet, biochemist, rabbi, Olympic athlete, college student and a policeman. Dispute all the negative things that is happening; four people have to be evict out of the shelter. Who will be the four unlucky people that will be evicted?
The …show more content…
In the beginning, we choose not to evict anyone out of the group and make the group members compromise to share the resources among each other to last them as long as they could. However, as we talked to our classmates and Professor Neal, we learned that we have no options about to evict four people out of the group. Each of us had our own thought who to evict. We all agreed on the Hollywood starlet and policeman with gun, but we could not decide between the college student, rabbi and famous historian. We talk and compromise, we choose our four unlucky people. After all, I did enjoy the exercise and at the same had some complication because I did not to discriminate anyone. In fact, I put myself in the college student’s place; I will not want to live through the nuclear war with a small amount of knowledge about the nuclear. I will rather not live and go through the struggle to live in a bad condition country. I want to give other people the opportunity to live and fight to live through the nuclear war. To explain, how I thought ” The key to identifying the structure of value relations is the assumption that actions taken in the pursuit of each type of values have psychological, practical, and social consequences that may conflict or may be compatible with the pursuit of other value types” (Ros, 1999, p.
The …show more content…
In the beginning, we choose not to evict anyone out of the group and make the group members compromise to share the resources among each other to last them as long as they could. However, as we talked to our classmates and Professor Neal, we learned that we have no options about to evict four people out of the group. Each of us had our own thought who to evict. We all agreed on the Hollywood starlet and policeman with gun, but we could not decide between the college student, rabbi and famous historian. We talk and compromise, we choose our four unlucky people. After all, I did enjoy the exercise and at the same had some complication because I did not to discriminate anyone. In fact, I put myself in the college student’s place; I will not want to live through the nuclear war with a small amount of knowledge about the nuclear. I will rather not live and go through the struggle to live in a bad condition country. I want to give other people the opportunity to live and fight to live through the nuclear war. To explain, how I thought ” The key to identifying the structure of value relations is the assumption that actions taken in the pursuit of each type of values have psychological, practical, and social consequences that may conflict or may be compatible with the pursuit of other value types” (Ros, 1999, p.