Foucault State Power

Improved Essays
The United State is 3.8 million square miles wide and has over 324 million people inside of its boarders, but shares the same federal government. The few people in the three branches of the federal government make laws for this vast and diverse population, and the people of the country do little to demand better representation. This is because the American citizens have been conditioned to be docile bodies, where the governing state “[increases] the forces of the body (in terms of economic utility) and diminishes these same forces (in political terms of obedience)” (Foucault 138). This is not specific to the American public, but rather a phenomenon occurring throughout the world. State power and discipline is used and abused to control the people it governs and has since the seventeenth century. Foucault’s definition of a discipline is not one of violence, but rather passive ways of regulating people so they are unaware that they are being controlled. As societies become more advanced and cities grow, they become more and more disciplined; more rules are imposed upon the people that they would not have otherwise. A farmer who is self-sufficient takes a break when he chooses and is not held to any sort of time table, but the mechanics of the modern office are …show more content…
Time as a method of discipline has been implemented for centuries, specifically with the church and later leaking into other discourses. In schools, the students would kneel, pray, salute, and sit down all at the signal of a bell as if they were machines (Foucault 150). This monitoring of time in the work force deters workers from distractions by keeping them on a set schedule where they are anticipating the next assigned task (Foucault

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Great Seal Analysis

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On the back of each dollar bill in circulation, the Great Seal of the United States appears. Made up of two symbols; one, an eagle clutching a scroll, olive branch, and arrows; the other, an unfinished pyramid with an all seeing eye. In Gordon Wood’s The American Revolution, he rhetorically asks, “how many Americans today know what the pyramid and eye on the Great Seal mean” (99). While most Americans today may look past these icons, both sides of the Great Seal signify the distinctly American thought of a constitution being a work in progress laid upon a strong foundation.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison and Alexis de Tocqueville are both giants in American political theory and both have deliberated extensively on the tyranny of the majority in democratic societies. Since both are from different eras, the way each of them talk about the problem is framed in different terms and different contexts. Madison offers a solution to a perceived problem, and Tocqueville observes and critiques the solution. In the many Federalist Papers Madison published on the issue, there is one solution that is most conductive to reducing the powers of the tyranny of the majority, and this is solution is the checks and balances between the separate branches of government and between the federal and state governments. Tocqueville’s assessment of this attempted restraint is poor, he sees the government as becoming increasingly centralized in power and state and local governments losing their prestige and influence.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitutional Framers

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the Constitutional Convention, when the framers took up the charge of creating the document that would see the newly formed nation into an ambiguous future they were met with a lengthy list of challenges. If the document they created was not definitive and resilient it would not endure. It had to be more than just a guide to the way Americans should behave towards one another, it also had ensure that one’s chosen to lead could not abuse the authority given to them at the expense of the people. For the purposes of this paper we will focus on representation, excessive democracy and governmental oversight.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no need to have an established fear in the central government, our separation from Great Britain proves otherwise. Our independence should be enough proof that we are not trying to become another monarch where people don’t get a voice. Establishing a strong central government requires a lot of support from the people, which is why The Articles of Confederation wouldn’t suffice to the needs we demand. Having a stronger central government will unite us together and fuse us as one voice as opposed to allowing the states to have sovereign power.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To me the major challenge that the Founding Fathers needed to reconcile was how to make 13 individual sovereign states into one functioning unit without infringing on the States right to govern their own citizens. James Madison, a staunch supporter of federalism, wrote in his The Federalist No. 10 “that no man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity (Dolbeare & Cummings, 2010, p. 93).” This is the basis for his argument that a large centralized federal government would be preferable to multiple small governments each possessing expanded powers, supported by a weaker centralized government available for oversight. With a strong central government…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I feel that the United States as a whole has grown too apathetic towards its own success to really have most people hold any applicable interest in the near-future of the country, and to relate to the models of democracy Hudson discusses in an earlier chapter, the protective democracy where individuals protect their own economic self-interest only seems to work when the country happens to have a strong economy to do so. I felt that protective democracy is the weakest model presented in that reading, along with pluralist democracy, which runs on a dichotomy of relying on interest and lobbying groups to get anything done while still extoling the virtues of ‘rugged’ individualism. This seemed to me to be one of the biggest challenges to the separation of powers, and democracy itself, so far, as interest groups have clearly grown out of control in the United States to the point that we still have groups like Monsanto around despite decades of bad ideas such as DDT, Agent Orange, and the addition of chemicals into everyday food. Interest and lobbying groups are something that I do not believe James Madison could have anticipated in The Federalist Papers, and they have grown large and insidious enough to become a danger towards a just representative government. This is where I believe a combination of the participatory and developmental democracy models would work the best, as there can still be a ‘power elite,’ but the common people create unions and boards to better control and manage non-government institutions that matter to them.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Our governing factors may not always be right, but few have the courage to take a stand and step outside their comfort zone. Government assumes numerous parts in the lives of people, some great and obviously some awful. Despite the fact that some concur with how our representing body handles unjustifiable circumstances numerous don't. A few authentic figures, for example, Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. stood firm for the privileges of americans and changed the lives for some eras to come. Martin Luther King Jr. states that the state ought to regard the individual, the part of an ethical individual is to contradict foul play in the public arena, and Thoreau trusts the administration exists by the assent of the individuals for the up most reason of executing their will.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    FEDERALISM versus STATES ' RIGHTS These passages present a discussion about arguments concerning federalism and states ' rights. This is an important debate for U.S. citizens since this directly affects our way of life. The two positions argue whether or not the idea of states ' rights is relevant today. Both viewpoints have valid claims warranting consideration; for example, evidence indicates that states should have the right to decide certain issues for themselves.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Anti-Federalists

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The majority of the United States’ population would describe their nation as a true democracy, but yet the same people from the same population would also argue that their government holds too much power. It is in the nature of man to want to be in complete control of his land and his way of life, but yet he doesn’t want to have to defend it on a daily basis. This universal enigma is why we have established systems of government. The key to this dilemma is to try to achieve a balance of power between the population and government that rules over them. How do you prevent a system of government from eroding the essential liberties that free men have the right to inherit?…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Specifically, Americans are unsatisfied with how the government operates. Stanford Levinson argues in his article, “The Ratification Referendum” that calling for a new constitutional convention is the solution. Others, Eric Lane and Michael Oreskes, argue in their editorial, “We,” that the only fault…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keeping the Peace – Responsibility for Insuring Domestic Tranquility in the United States Insure domestic tranquility is one of the most important clauses in the Preamble to the Constitution because it provides an overriding guideline about the importance of keeping peace within the United States. The United States’ founding fathers defined this phrase as the promise to run the country will be run as perfectly as can be. Domestic tranquility means no fighting between the states and peace in the public. A better understanding of who controls this theme has evolved throughout the country’s history. Although the general public had some power in issues in the country, the idea of insuring domestic tranquility evolved from the people responsible for keeping the country calm and peaceful to the government taking over the responsibility because the government had more power and control than the people.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays