In regards to the internet, the world is at a standstill . The web has proven that it has unprecedented abilities. The internet has allowed ideas, opinions, and information to spread across the globe. However, the internet is under attack. Surveillance has become the expected norm. Neutrality is beginning to disappear. The freedom of the web is being taken away. This paper will examine the viewpoints of two thinkers on the current dispute about the internet. Freud would not have supported the new regulations. Freud would have viewed the web as a tool for speak therapy, releasing desires, and equality. Foucault would also support a free web. Foucault would express that the internet allows marginalized ideas to flow freely. Knowledge can
…show more content…
Foucault would view the internet as a source of knowledge. The greatness of the web comes from the ability to desert politically correct viewpoints. Instead, the web allows for non-neutral ideas to be expressed. Idea, opinions, and viewpoints flow freely on the web. Also, Foucault stated his dislike for manufactured mainstream ideas. Foucault believed there was no truth. Foucault would support the web, because the internet allows all ideas to be equal. Many marginalized views that never survive the media run free on the web. Foucault would definitely view the internet as a method to leave the systems of power. Also, Foucault would be strongly against the surveillance on the web. Foucault allies himself with enlightenment thinkers (Berard, 1993). Similar to enlightenment thinkers, Foucault wants to liberate people from the oppressive powers. Foucault would disagree with surveillance because it would result in people watching themselves. When people know they are being watched they begin to change their behaviour. We learn to watch ourselves (Berard, 1993). Consequently, the internet loses its ability to allow non-mainstream ideas to flow. Instead, the internet becomes another administered power system. Foucault would view the loss of freedom on the web as the web becoming another tool of oppression. Surveillance turns people into their own internal watchmen (Berard,
Foucault would view the internet as a source of knowledge. The greatness of the web comes from the ability to desert politically correct viewpoints. Instead, the web allows for non-neutral ideas to be expressed. Idea, opinions, and viewpoints flow freely on the web. Also, Foucault stated his dislike for manufactured mainstream ideas. Foucault believed there was no truth. Foucault would support the web, because the internet allows all ideas to be equal. Many marginalized views that never survive the media run free on the web. Foucault would definitely view the internet as a method to leave the systems of power. Also, Foucault would be strongly against the surveillance on the web. Foucault allies himself with enlightenment thinkers (Berard, 1993). Similar to enlightenment thinkers, Foucault wants to liberate people from the oppressive powers. Foucault would disagree with surveillance because it would result in people watching themselves. When people know they are being watched they begin to change their behaviour. We learn to watch ourselves (Berard, 1993). Consequently, the internet loses its ability to allow non-mainstream ideas to flow. Instead, the internet becomes another administered power system. Foucault would view the loss of freedom on the web as the web becoming another tool of oppression. Surveillance turns people into their own internal watchmen (Berard,