Formal Legal Rationality And Contradiction: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
In the David M. Trubek article “complexity and Contradiction” it describes how for a state to function there needs be legitimate or fair in the eyes of citizens. For a state to be legitimate it needs to completely follow its own laws and practices as stated,” Formal legal rationality is a measure of legiti-mate rule, and deviations from this standard run the risk of destroying the legitimacy of the state” (536). “Formal legal rationality” means in the article that laws need to make sense and be fair for the state to be legitimate. Public interest law movements are groups of lawyers who fight for the rationality of the laws and question the legitimacy of the system. They work outside of the normal lawyer system as stated, “Public interest law

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Legalist Paradigm Analysis

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages

    March 23, 1999 marked the beginning of the NATO bombing campaign against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia lasting three months. The rationale for the campaign was on the basis of “humanitarian intervention.” It was said to be in prevention of the ethnic cleansing of the Kosovar Albanians of Siberia by the authoritative regime of Slobodan Milosevic. The moral justification of this conflict has since been contested with the validity debated by a variety of theoretical schools of thought. This essay will use the revisions to the Legalist Paradigm presented by Walzer in conjunction with the conditions of jus ad bellum to prove the moral impermissibility of NATOs intervention in Kosovo.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the persuasive article by Scott Anderson, the rhetor puts together an argument using the six components, Exordium, narration, partition, confirmation, refutation, and conclusion. He claims that minors should not be put into the adult system yet he strives more for people to ponder the situation at a much higher level of thinking. The exordium is used to grab the attention of the audience and show he is worth listening to. Since it is a difficult case, Anderson must use an insinuation. The insinuation is needed to ease a hostile audience into listening.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nozick argued against end state or pattern principles of justice. People create wealth. The money that you acquired you can keep if you earned it fairly. For example, if person A has a car and person B has a bike and they interchange willingly, then each person would feel they received of greater or equal value for their exchange. If nobody hurts anyone, or manipulates anyone to get what they want then government should not interfere.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As noted by William, legality is a confinement of the powerful who dictate what is right and wrong in the society. Therefore, the law is not a universal threshold to ascertain the correctness of people’s actions because but its nature it has…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Civil laws are laws that are set in place to help protect people rights when it comes down to person to person. One example might be landlord, tenant situation where the tenant is failing to pay rent which was agreed upon, and an agreement was signed. This is where civil law would step in and assist the landlord. As described in our book, Criminal law is dealing with wrong doings against society. These laws are put in place and have consequences.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Susan B. Anthony once asked, "Are you going to cater to the whims and prejudices of people who have no intelligent knowledge of what they condemn?" While the answer is seemingly obvious, few individuals have dared to oppose established laws and stand up for their unorthodox beliefs. Raised in an era in which women lacked many basic rights and were considered inferior to men, Susan B. Anthony challenged America’s deeply ingrained social norms of male dominance and advocated for major reform. On November 5, 1872, she casted her ballot in the national election.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Canadian justice system faces controversies set out and displayed in a series of articles by Edward Greenspan, who is a Toronto criminal lawyer and Anthony Doob, who is a professor of criminology at the University of Toronto. The first pointed out that currently The federal government is wanting to reintroduce controversial penalties for the organized crime act that was shot down when the spring election was called, such as minimum sentences for growing marijuana or selling it around youth (Greenspan & Doob, 2011). The second article by the authors discusses the matter of how Canadians in a 1975 United nations conference initiated a process of transferring foreign inmates to their home country, and now as of 2006 the government is turning away transfers due to wanting to enhance public safety (Greenspan & Doob, 2011). The final article in The Globe and Mail informs Canadians that The government of Canada wishes to impose stricter restrictions on the use of conditional sentences, such as house arrest, to protect public safety and better the communities. By doing this, they are imposing a higher cost on the community (Greenspan & Doob, 2011).…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Right Court but the Wrong Appeal Pay No Attention to the Men Behind the Curtain: The Supreme Court, Popular Culture, and the Countermajoritarian Problem is an article written by Adam Burton. His article depicts how the American people view the Supreme Court through pop culture, and how this relationship affects the public’s confidence in Judiciary Review. The article also demonstrates how the increased exposure of the Justices personal lives through highly televised confirmation hearings has not sparked the public’s interest into the inner workings of the court.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Human societies have always required systems to maintain balance, order, and control. The foundation of human civilization spawned from a rapid growth in population during the neolithic era, compelling communities to form hierarchical systems, and early ideas of law. While, during the millennia that followed, ideological and technological progress compelled these systems to evolve and improve, history reveals a repetitive continuity connecting the past and present. The decisions, systems, and mistakes made in the past inevitably echo into the future, our occasional capacity to learn from these mistakes notwithstanding.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to comply to certain laws as a form of peaceful protest. It has long been debated whether civil disobedience is beneficial to society. Acts of civil disobedience, seen and unseen in the media, have occurred at various points in history as forms of protest to oppression, violence, and discrimination. Although it could be debated that civil disobedience has negative and positive impacts on society, the positive impacts far outweigh the negative even if the only thing accomplished in the act of disobedience is raising awareness. Morris Leibman argues that the law serves a specific purpose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals have rights that are extracted from the law of god or moral laws. It is the duty of individuals in democratic society to follow the laws of the land, if they are just. It’s an overstatement to think the government doesn’t create unjust laws. When faced with an unjust law, a decision has to be made by possibly resorting to deceptive practices. There must be the courage to disobey any unjust law and discharge it as a moral…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since the Supreme Court's inception, there has been considerable debate on its proper role in government. This discourse includes disagreements over the proper role of courts in comparison to legislatures, as well as significant dispute on the degree of rigidity necessary when interpreting the language of the Constitution. From this discourse, two opposing schools of thought have formed: proponents of judicial activism and the implicit ideal of loose constructionism against proponents of judicial restraint and the implicit ideal of strict constructionism. Judicial activism and the "living constitution" interpretation are often criticized for being undemocratic.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Law Vs Tort

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The criminal law Is one that contains many complex and intricate parts. Why must such an important system be as complex as it Is in the United States? Why does the government make it so hard for regular everyday people to understand the basis of law and the difference between a law and a tort? They use words such as politicality, penal sanctions, and many more to perplex the public. I think that the reason for this is to make it harder for an everyday person to know his or her rights and for them to not know the basis of crime.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Ethics of Natural Law,” C.E. Harris explains the views of natural-law theorists. First, he states that the moral standard of natural law is that the actions that promote the values that follow the natural inclinations of human beings are right. These values include life, procreation, knowledge, and sociability. Anything, such as murder, birth control, stifling intellectual curiosity, or spreading lies, that opposes these four natural inclinations is wrong. Then, Harris notes that natural-law theory is absolutist, explaining that no values specified by natural inclinations may be violated and values cannot be measured or compared.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his 1973 paper, “Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?” M.B.E. Smith posits that the questions asking, “have the citizens of any government a prima facie obligation to obey the law?” and “what governments enjoy legitimate authority” are two distinct questions, and thus should not be conflated. It is my contention, that while these two questions are—and should be kept—separate, the latter can inform the former. Smith argues that “although those subject to a government often have a prima facie obligation to obey particular laws (e.g., when disobedience has seriously untoward consequences or involves an act that is mala in se), they have no prima facie obligation to obey all its laws" I believe that this statement is incorrect.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays