Henry’s point of view regarding the war was a neutral one in the introduction of the novel. When Henry was injured and posted in the Milan hospital, Henry’s outlook on the topic of war takes an unsettling turn. This does inform how he tells the story because throughout the book, it changes. In the beginning of the novel I felt that Henry neither had a positive or negative reaction to the war until his injury. Towards the end of the novel, Henry no longer wants to participate in the war and is no longer interested in receiving a medal for recognition of being injured simply because at the time of the injury he was not engaging in a heroic act. Henry takes the “nothing is worse than war” side of the argument in Chapter IX. I believe that Hemingway introduced the debate just before men are injured and killed to the reader to give both sides an equal chance at winning the reader’s conscious through the debate before seeing the absolute negative effects of the concept,
Henry’s point of view regarding the war was a neutral one in the introduction of the novel. When Henry was injured and posted in the Milan hospital, Henry’s outlook on the topic of war takes an unsettling turn. This does inform how he tells the story because throughout the book, it changes. In the beginning of the novel I felt that Henry neither had a positive or negative reaction to the war until his injury. Towards the end of the novel, Henry no longer wants to participate in the war and is no longer interested in receiving a medal for recognition of being injured simply because at the time of the injury he was not engaging in a heroic act. Henry takes the “nothing is worse than war” side of the argument in Chapter IX. I believe that Hemingway introduced the debate just before men are injured and killed to the reader to give both sides an equal chance at winning the reader’s conscious through the debate before seeing the absolute negative effects of the concept,