Forensics On Trial Analysis

Improved Essays
Forensics on trial describes the techniques that have been used in forensic science that have shown faults, or as NOVA’s “Forensics on Trial” stated, “there’s not enough science in forensic science.” There are many types of evidence that have to be analyzed, such as bite mark and foot print impressions, fingerprints, and many more. As types of evidence rise more techniques are required to analyze them, and the objective of “Forensics on Trial” is how to ensure a flawless system.
The part of forensics that is on trial is the science that does not seem to give enough results, which is most often the fault of human error. In order to fix this, there needs to be more concrete standards and procedures for analyzing techniques as stated in “Forensics
…show more content…
The criminal justice system works together in many branches such as police, forensic scientists, and jurors. This was illustrated “Forensics on Trial” in the O.J. Simpson case, when police officers ruined evidence that could have incriminated O.J. and made it impossible to convict him. But forensic scientists themselves have also given forensic science a bad rap. For example, bite mark evidence can be very useful, but when Sabina Kulakowski from “Forensics on Trial” was examined for her bite marks the wrong person was convicted. The forensic scientist that examined her bite marks and noticed there was one hole in the bruise, and the man convicted was not just missing one tooth, but two. Therefore there should have been two missing parts in the bruise, but the forensic scientist inferred that the suspect moved his mouth which created only one hole. The inference that the forensic scientist made convicted an innocent man for the murder Sabina Kulakowski, and he spent twelve years in jail for a crime he did not commit. Forensic science needs more structured science behind it, and jurors need to realize that any science relies on human discretion which is not foolproof.
The forensic system could always use new techniques and improvements, but the science behind forensics is not the problem, it is the human error behind it. We need stronger standards for the analysis of evidence or an accreditation process. For example, as “Forensics on Trial” stated, “Forensic science bite mark evidence is more of an art than it is a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What are the benefits of forensic science? Why is the application of forensic science in courtrooms beneficial? Can forensic science further lead to less cases where innocent people are put into prison for something they did not commit? It is said that "Since 1989, there have been tens of thousands of cases where prime suspects were identified and pursued—until DNA testing proved that they were wrongly accused" (Innocence Project, 2016). It is time, at last, to speak the truth about forensic science, and the truth is this.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Simpson not guilty for the murders of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, evidence discovered during, and after the trial, proves that the trial consisted of other reasons for his acquittal. An abundant amount of evidence proves that O.J. Simpson should have ultimately been proven guilty for the murders. However, many people overlooked the facts and decided the verdict based on their morals and emotions. An article written through the New York Times states “The amount of O.J.’s blood found on the crime scene, on his socks, and in his car should have made the jury’s decision an easy one.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Common criminal cases rely heavily on eyewitness memory resulting in inaccurate prosecutions. According to memory researcher Elizabeth Loftus, a person can develop false memories, but believe them to be accurate. Elizabeth analyzed one case where a man was falsely convicted of rape because a woman identified him as “the closest” looking to the rapist. Eventually, a journalist studied the man’s case and found the real rapist that had committed fifty or more rapes in that area. About three hundred people have been falsely convicted of a crime due to false memories, that later was proved innocent based on DNA testing.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is due to the likelihood of the evidence being discreetly placed or tampered with at the crime scene by persons of interest with the sole purpose of misleading the investigation. For example, the wrongful conviction of Gerard Richardson for 19 years by the state of New Jersey, where forensic experts wrongfully matched the bites mark in the victim’s neck to his teeth. As such, it portrays how misrepresented, and misleading forensic identification of evidence can lead to wrongful incarceration of a defendant. This also puts into question forensic techniques of identification of crime perpetrators utilizing DNA samples of individuals in a national database; basing on the discrepancies arising in varied lab practices a mismatch might occur pinning an innocent individual to a heinous crime like…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The suggestibility of the officers negatively implicated Pratt as the criminal and made the eyewitnesses believe that he was the one they saw, when in the beginning they knew it was not him. The justice system needs to be filled with individuals that are focused on finding justice, not on their own impulse or motivation. Consequently, a plethora of innocent lives have been placed behind bars due to these types of situations. In court, prosecutors asked the eyewitnesses about the scars on Pratt’s face, the type of jacket he was wearing, and his facial hair. These identifications were a large part of the case, eventually leading to his indictment.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many death row cases are based on eyewitness information, because the case lacks leads from other sources, which leaves the prosecutors to relay on the eyewitness, as described in the innocent execution of Carlos Luna (10 Convicts Presumed Innocent After Execution, 2010). Senator Raymond Lesniak explains in his speech at the International Human Rights Competition that revenge will only open the door to evil and redemption will bring out the peace by forgiveness, the following quote is from his speech, “The need for revenge leads to hate and violence. Redemption opens the door to healing and peace. Revenge slams it shut” (Lesniak). It is undeniably hard to imagine why people are for the death…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many cases the analyst is one-sided and is testifying to help the prosecutors. They will testify against the defendant with forensic proof coming from multiple aspects of DNA. Such as rape kits, finger prints, etc. with multiple chances of cross contamination happening. In which they will mix up the evidence from the scene with the DNA swab they took from the suspect, causing the suspect to look…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These trials are nothing more than fraud trial which defy the spiritual ethics as well as the societal framework of life. Experience has shown that innocent people are often convicted of a crime including capital crimes and that some of them have been executed. “Hugo bedaub states that no matter careful courts are, the possibility of perjured testimony, mistaken honest, and human error remains all too real”. A recent study show over 400 cases of wrong conviction for capital offenses in the Unites Stated between 1900 and 1991. We can cite the case of Curtis McCarty served 21 years and 18 years on death row for a murder he did not commit, but when they reexamined the case and they found him innocent.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Due to advanced technology, we are able to clear individuals of a crime they were suspected of before the death penalty is carried out, making capital punishment a more reliable and effective means of punishing criminals and bringing about justice. One example is that of Corey Omar Posley-Wells, a twenty-seven year old man who was convicted of killing Irene Kunze, a ninety year old woman. Reporter Jim Adams says, “Police linked him to the crime scene using a relatively new type of DNA technology that matched his DNA to that found in skin or body-fluid traces in her apartment”. His article continues on to describe the relief of the other…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    New evidence uncovered by reporters Maurice Possley and Steve Mills casts doubt on DeLuna’s guilt and points towards another man, Carlos Hernandez, who had a record of similar crimes and repeatedly confessed to the murder.” This is just one of the many cases where innocent people are killed for no reason. The justice system tends to kill people that are innocent before they find enough evidence or test DNA. This is a bad habit of them, but we wouldn’t have to worry about this if the death penalty was no longer here. According to the US death row study, “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment.” 4.1% is a lot and it may seem like a small number, but its not. Innocent people die from the death penalty and it does happen often.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays