Immanuel Kant's For The Sake Of Duty

Decent Essays
Mone Harrison
Professor Musselman
Philosophy 1C
1 October 2015
For the Sake of Duty Every year there is some celebrity that is donating to some charity ranging from it is Justin Bieber and Pencils of Promise to Rob Gronkowski and the Buzz For Kids Foundation. As a result, each and every year we put these celebrities on a pedestal for giving back to these various communities, whether it was a haircut to help kids with cancer get wigs, or getting the various celebrity’s hoards of fans to donate money to give thousands of dollars to the organizations to support sick kids and those who are in need in other ways. Many of these celebrities brag about the work that they are doing to help support the needy and even get tax write-offs for the donations
…show more content…
Like every other person, his theory has its faults. He has every right to feel what he does, but he did not take into consideration that every person and every culture has their own ways of thinking. The culture of our time is so heavily influenced by charity work, higher education and money that we do not even take the time out to consider why someone is doing what they have chosen to do. This does not not make our deeds bad. If someone wants to go back to school to get a better paying job, their decision is not a bad one. Just like someone who is going to school and has no future plan in mind is not bad. In Kant 's eyes this person is a better person because they are following his universal morality. If Kant had his way, we would all be mindless beings who are not allowed to exercise our free will. Everybody makes decisions based off of selfish desires once in a while, but that does not cancel the good of the outcome. We should take the outcome of situations into account, and allow for that to decide whether a deed is good or bad, and not the motives behind the decision. If we did things Immanuel Kant 's way, our nation would not be where it is

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant On Direct Duty

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant asks his readers to live through the terms of direct and indirect duties. A direct duty is an obligation from being to another based on what that being is. An indirect duty is an obligation to something as a result of a direct duty. A real life example that portrays this system would go as follows: a man has a direct duty to another human, Sally, but because she is a self-conscious human. This same man, Erik, does not have a direct duty to sally’s cat, Bons.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Questions pertaining to whether certain actions are morally right or morally wrong are never easy to settle. There are various moral theories that try to address the question, divine command theory, virtue ethics, ethical egoism, cultural relativism, to name just a few. There is, of course, not much agreement among moral philosophers as to which is correct. There is, however, much agreement on what is actually morally right or morally wrong. The merits of a particular moral theory will depend (in part) on whether or not it can account for actions most of us consider to be right.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Duty

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He says that we should find moral worth based solely on law, but all laws aren’t going to be morally okay with everyone. A prime example is the thought on abortion between the two political parties. The republicans feel like abortion should be regulated and many don’t view abortion as morally okay and the democrats say it’s the women’s body let her do with it what she wants, there isn’t a law dictating or governing abortions.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s impact on Western thought is undoubtedly profound. Being one of the most distinguished figures of the German Idealist movement of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Kant’s work has set a precedent that, to this day, deeply influences our understanding of ethical discussion, political philosophy, and human cognition. Kant’s multiple contributions still are subject of debate; although, it is his Categorical Imperative that gathers the most attention, discourse, and controversy. Being a reaction to the subjectivity of his era, the Categorical Imperative provides an objective and infallible guideline for universal moral behavior, that stipulates one’s actions should not be dependent on ulterior motives and in consideration that the act itself will become universally accepted, ergo, if one were to steal then one should also be accepting of…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Code Of Ethics

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1) Part A) The following are Kant's important ideas about ethics. The first is the principle of Universality, which states that we must follow the rules of behavior, that we can apply universally to everyone. And the other is the logic or the reason determines the rules of ethical behavior, the actions are mostly good because they follow from the logic. (Gift of Fire-social, Legal and ethical issues for computing technology, pg no-29,1.4 Ethics.)…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Chapter 5 Sandel introduces us to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This chapter talks focuses on Kant’s view on motive such as: What is the Supreme principle of morality and what is human freedom? Kant believes that morality is based on universal law. Kant calls this act categorical imperative. The idea is that you should treat everyone how everyone would want to be treated.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant's Conceptions Of Duty

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant’s conception of duty, as focused on in the ground work Metaphysics of Morals, enlightens us about the morality of the black lives matter movement. However, the concept of duty can be abstract based on apriori ideas. So we need to follow Kant, by creating a maxim and testing that maxim in the context of the categorical empirical. Racial profiling by law enforcement Nationwide is wrong and our maxim must guard against such immorality.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PHL 301: Midterm Exam Jessica Korpinen 1. Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill serve as paradoxes of one another. Kant believed that our moral worth was dependent on whether we did the right action for the right reason. His ethics revolve around the concept of a “categorical imperative”. This implies that an action should only be performed after deciding whether or not it is moral that everyone else follows through with the same action in the future.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who was born on April 22, 1724. He is a central figure in modern philosophy. One of his biggest works is “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” that was written in 1785. Kant argued that right actions are only right if those actions are not instigated by impulses or desires, but by practical reason. He believes that actions are only right if it fulfills one’s duty.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher remembered for his influence on ethics. Ethics is the philosophical study of moral actions. There are two particular ways of thinking regarding ethics: consequentialism and deontology. Consequentialism divides right and wrong entirely based on the consequences of an action - the end justifies the means. Deontology is the position arguing that consequences do not matter because moral judgement is based on the act alone, not the consequences.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics