For Cause And Comrades Analysis

Improved Essays
There were a great number of motivations, which contributed to each individual soldiers reasoning behind enlisting in either the Union, or Confederate armies in 1861. Common motivations that I found in For Cause and Comrades included duty, honor, religion, race, peers, family, and most importantly a sense of nationalism. While reading McPherson’s text these factors were so strongly described by the soldiers that they transcended the individual’s desire for safety and home and led these men to enlist.
The core reason, according to McPherson for soldier’s decisions to fight was the concepts of duty and honor. McPherson claims that both of these ideas were “powerful motivating sources” (McPherson pg.5). Furthermore, McPherson noticed that Union soldiers were more likely to speak of duty as a motivating factor while Confederate soldiers were more likely to speak of honor as a motivating factor. This geographical ideological divide was likely caused by the South’s “sense Southern honor”, while the North focused more on a sense of Northern conscience (McPherson pg.24). However, despite these observations made by McPherson he goes on to state that, neither the Confederate soldiers in the limited sample specifically mention honor or duty at all. Their letters were preoccupied with other matters concerning family and religion. Conversely, Union solider mentioned these concepts within their letters. In a letter to his parents, a new recruit from Nashville wrote that “nothing
…show more content…
Both Union and Confederate soldiers used rhetoric and symbols of country, liberty, legacy and Constitution in explaining their motivations for volunteering for service (McPherson pg. 21). However, the South and the North used their own brand of rhetoric and reasoning for that rhetoric in different

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The men will fight for their country even if it means losing a lot of their soldiers. According to the journal entries in document C men would be calling out for food they were so hungry and the men were “...discontented- and out of humour.”. The “... melancholy sound…(Document C)” would echo back to the campsite of men’s hunger made it hard for soldiers to want to re-enlist. The men were ready to give up, but they were willing to fight through everything for their…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Bitterly Divided Summary

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It came as quite a shock to me to find out that much of the South was not supportive of the Civil War in the first place, including my own hometown of Harris County, Georgia, where it was even stated that they were “Union loving people” (10). In reality, the main people who…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a copious aggregate of years, historians have attempted to determine why individuals took part in the American Civil War. Furthermore, numerous experts have conjectured on why it necessitated a bloody skirmish to overhaul a nation that had previously been fragmented due to the diverse ideologies of the North and the South. In his novel What They Fought For, James M. McPherson avows that even though the soldiers of both sides originated from the same motherland, it was their disparate dogmata’s that instigated them to endure belligerence and foster the extrication of their country. In his novel, McPherson derives distinctive tones and deposits them in the profound and abysmal chorus of a budding nation divvied amongst itself. In addition,…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the course of his book, Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam, James McPherson examines not only the events that occurred on September 17, 1862, but he also outlines the causes and explanations for the American Civil War. Firstly, McPherson emphasizes the role that slavery played in causing the war and he shares details regarding the outcomes and results of this historic battle. McPherson’s second main objective of this book is to highlight how tentative General McClellan was over the course of the war. General McClellan was too cautious in engaging the Confederate Army even when he had the captured plans of General Lee.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Cause & Comrades is a historical non-fiction based on more than 25,000 letters and close to 250 private diaries from Civil War soldiers of both armies. This book answers the question why men would fight in the Civil War. He first became obsessed with answering this question when students asked him why 13,000 Confederate soldiers would constantly charge across open terrain in the Battle of Gettysburg while taking heavy rifle and artillery fire, only to fall…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was a devastating war that wiped out much of America’s population. The book written by James M. McPherson, What They Fought For 1861-1865, describes the views of the soldiers that fought in the war. McPherson uses letters left behind written by different civil war soldiers to portray a more round view of actions that took place on the battlegrounds. McPherson’s thesis does not present from both sides of the war what the soldiers, volunteers and enlisted men, of the Civil War had to faced, how they dealt with their emotions and experiences, the bond made between comrades, and how it affect their overall psychological, physical, and mental well-being of each combatant. This book contains diary entries from Union soldiers that were from the northern states.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soldiers also left their posts because of letters from distressed family members. Many soldiers went home because of these, and because of this the Confederacy made it illegal for family members to encourage the soldiers to come home. The Union encouraged Confederate soldiers to desert because they promised to house any Confederate soldier that came to them (Desertion…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the Civil War, many men felt the urge to stand up for their country and enroll in the army. But the downside is that some families had different beliefs, causing different parts of a family to live in either the north or south. When it would come time for battle, families would end up fighting each other and possibly kill a loved one. This didn't just happen between the Union and the Confederacy, and it was more likely to happen in border states. These states were not claimed by either the north or south, for there were many people who had different opinions on what side they wanted to fight with.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Greed Analysis

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Greed is a common vice among many people, especially during the Civil War era in the South when so much importance was placed on wealth, personal property, and therefor, upon honor (Greenberg, The Nose, the Lie, and the Duel in the Antebellum South, Pages 57-74). It was human nature to protect one’s personal property and asset’s before even considering the general well being of the rest of the population. However, the cooperation and scarification of all that a large plantation owner could afford to give was especially important to the war effort in this time period. In such an even fight against the Union, any upper hand advantage was greatly needed; in this case, the advantage was the enslaved population. The real question in this situation…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Civil War predictable? Did any events indefinitely cause the South to desire a split from the North? The North and the South had a growing tension between them for many reasons, and the northern abolitionists encouraged a Civil War through their actions of protest. Although many Americans were affected minimally by the changes of the nation, abolitionists inevitably foresaw a Civil War because the growing tensions between the North and the South became apparent in political and social changes, slavery issues, and the growing occurrence of rebellions. Political and social changes occurred in many ways, including The Second Great Awakening, Lincoln’s presidential election to office, the way the North and the South dealt with one another,…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Civil War was very misunderstood in that no one really knows the exact reason of why the war started. In Apostles of Disunion, Dew discusses topics such as slavery, racism, economics and state rights to push his point of view on the audience of why the war and secession began. Charles B. Dew wrote this book to inform the audience the secession came from not just the factor of state rights during the time between 1860 and 1861. Because Dew was a Southerner himself, he writes the book off of self-knowledge, experience others, and facts including people and their perspectives on the cause. The most common claim when it came to The Civil War’s cause is it beginning due to slavery and racism in the south; however Dew argues that the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the southern states that sided with the Confederacy, the Civil War was viewed as a “Lost Cause.” Despite losing the war, the South applauded the “chivalric Southern soldiers” who fought against the “rapacious Northern industrial machine”(Wills, 2015) in defence of their state rights. The Union may have ratified the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to abolish slavery, but it could not erase the intolerance that still existed in the country. Thus, the amendments held little power over the southern ideals.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These values are inscribed into the beliefs of the Confederacy and sharply contrast the changing values of Grant and the Union. Grant represents the future of America as he is fighting to end the beliefs of the privileges of that Lee symbolizes. In the “Western country, there was a deep, implicit dissatisfaction with a past that had settled into grooves. ”(8) and General Grant fought to remove the dissatisfactory foundation that America originated from, alluding to the fact that Grant represents the new foundation of America in which he was fighting to create. General Grant and General Lee have contrasting ideas to fight for as, Grant is fighting for the future and Lee is fighting to preserve the past.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Apostles of Disunion, Charles Dew discusses how he originally thought that states’ rights were the predominant reason that the Civil War occurred. This point of view stemmed from his readings as a boy and his ancestor’s experiences with the war. The central idea behind the authors writing of the book is his analysis of the letters and speeches that the secession commissioners wrote, in which he sought the reasons other than states’ rights to their secession from the Union. Correspondingly, he argues for the centrality of race and slavery as the reasons for the South’s secession. What’s more, is the reasoning behind why the author is writing this book and his projected achievements from doing so.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What led to the American Civil War is a topic of debate which lacks a simple answer. There is heated debate whether the war was fought for emancipation or to preserve the Union. Historians can advocate for either argument since both sides have ample evidence to support their respective standpoint. Both Hollywood and scholarship agree that the Civil War is a war to preserve the Union. While the issue of slavery was a massive factor in the war, it was not the defining factor.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays