does not follow the natural history of the social problems process. The film does make a strong claim about our food system. They also give media coverage and public reaction by using interviews and by creating a movie. Although after the policy making the policy was vetoed which caused the policy to be ineffective and not have a future outcome to improve the new agreements on our food. In the book it states that the definition of a social problem is "A condition that can somehow harm society or is a condition that undermines the well being of society and is a public controversy" (Best, 3&4). Overall after watching this documentary I am lead to believe that this social problem with our food is an extremely controversial problem and that it is a problem that needs to be dealt with so that people as a whole in society can be healthier and can gain the right to have knowledge of what they consume on a day to day basis from seed to
does not follow the natural history of the social problems process. The film does make a strong claim about our food system. They also give media coverage and public reaction by using interviews and by creating a movie. Although after the policy making the policy was vetoed which caused the policy to be ineffective and not have a future outcome to improve the new agreements on our food. In the book it states that the definition of a social problem is "A condition that can somehow harm society or is a condition that undermines the well being of society and is a public controversy" (Best, 3&4). Overall after watching this documentary I am lead to believe that this social problem with our food is an extremely controversial problem and that it is a problem that needs to be dealt with so that people as a whole in society can be healthier and can gain the right to have knowledge of what they consume on a day to day basis from seed to