Flattery In Julius Caesar Quote Analysis

Improved Essays
The play, Julius Caesar, by Shakespeare has many themes, but one that is recurrent is one can be easily flattered through the misconstruing of words and the use of persuasion. Cassius uses flattery upon many of the other actors to make them do what he says. Misconstruement of words is introduced in “Act I Scene I” where the cobbler uses a play on words. Shakespeare also adds another part that builds up the play in this scene that illustrates the fickleness of the people as they celebrate Caesar’s defeat of Pompey. Fickleness is also shown again in “Act II Scene I” as the conspirators are fickle as they try to persuade Brutus into killing Caesar with the addition of Antony and then adding Cicero as a conspirator. Brutus turns down these ideas in which the conspirators agree. This shows that their opinions were easily persuaded and in this stance, Brutus became the leader of the conspiracy over Cassius as he gives the final say so and carries out the plan. …show more content…
In this stance, Cassius offers to be his mirror to see himself in new ways and to discover himself when really this was the start of his campaign to turn Brutus against Caesar as he alarms him about Caesar’s power. Cassius then brews a plan to forge notes and put them into Brutus’ office to take advantage of him in this moment as he begins to go to war with himself. Cassius’ previous words were proven powerful as Brutus begins to contemplate what he should do as he stands in his orchard. As Brutus reads the letters, it tells him everything he wants to hear. In this scene, “Act II Scene I”, is where the misconstruement of words takes place as he reads the letters and he construes the message to his preconceived

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    ]/ Let Antony and Caesar fall together” (II.ii.157-163). Brutus then responds, “Our course will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius, / […] / For Antony is but a limb of Caesar” (II.ii.164-167). This conversation demonstrates the arrogance of Brutus and the disagreements between Brutus and Cassius. Their loyalty struggles at times, especially when it comes to decision making.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Later, Brutus joins the conspiracy, although after much moral debate,…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the play Julius Caesar, Shakespeare was able to show how rhetorical devices are able to persuade an audience. In Shakespeare’s play, Mark Antony, who was loyal to Caesar, delivered a speech to Romans that supported Brutus after the funeral of Caesar. The speech conveyed why Caesar was a loyal Roman. By depending on expressing emotions, usage of diction, and logic of the argument, Antony persuades the Roman citizens that Caesar had more loyalty than Brutus. Throughout his speech, Antony appeals to the audience’s emotions to persuade the audience that Caesar was a virtuous leader who did not deserve a premature death.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This line of text is discreetly formulated to appeal to Brutus’ logos, ethos and pathos altogether to sway his opinion. It is suggested that the faults in society and in men are not predetermined by fate, but instead determined by themselves. The word “fault”, although not clearly defined, implies that there exists a fault in themselves (thus they’re the commonly-ignored underdogs), but fault suggest that the entirety of society is at fault. This logically targets Brutus’ own morals that the concept of society should always come first before anything else. Cassius also uses intimate words such as “dear” and “ourselves”, seemingly building credibility for himself as if he were very close friends with Brutus, and that he was to be trusted.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While it is true that Cassius is the father of the conspiracy; and he did deceive Brutus into killing his friend, he is not the most responsible…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cicero was historically noted to be a strong and stubborn orator who was loathe to follow others. Therefore, Brutus’s logic holds true and settles the debate on adding Cicero as a conspirator. Secondly, the discussion of who else to kill with Caesar arises. Brutus again uses logic to bring a conclusion. He opposes killing anyone else for fear of seeming like murderers and traitors rather than champions of Rome’s independence from tyrants.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Words are the knives that stab Caesar, each one coming at a different angle and with more force than the one before. If hit in the wrong place, one can kill, if not, one leaves them in pain and suffering. Throughout the play Julius Caesar, written by playwright William Shakespeare, friends and foes attain the forceful weapons of words. Following the assassination of the great ruler Julius Caesar, two well-respected men, Brutus and Antony, express the power of speech to gain the crowds affection during the funeral of the beloved Caesar. Brutus, a well respected Conspirator and Antony, a loyal friend of Caesar, avail rhetorical and literary devices, conveying different tones of persuasion and matter of fact against manipulation and melancholy…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While arranging the assassination Cassius recognizes Brutus as a noble man in the public's eye and as someone who needs to be on his side, “Well, Brutus, thou art noble”(1.2.306). Cassius recognizes that Brutus is the key to the assassination to succeed. If Brutus is for the conspirators the public will follow because they know honorable Brutus. Another conspirator that recognizes Brutus’ importance is Casca, “But win the noble Brutus to our party”(1.3.141). Casca knows how highly Brutus is held by the public.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brutus is right in joining the conspiracy because it helped Rome while causing minimum harm, Caesar was a tyrant,…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Flattery can make even the thickest skinned people believe you. A person can use just their words to persuade their audience. It’s an easy way to manipulate someone to do what you want. Throughout the play Julius Caesar, flattery is used to manipulate and convince the other characters.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At this time, Cassius is also trying to persuade Brutus to join the conspirators in killing Caesar. Aware that Brutus would never kill Caesar, Cassius convinces him that he would be a better ruler for Rome than Caesar. Cassius says “ ‘Tis just/ And it is very much lamented, Brutus/ That you have no such mirrors as will…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The acclaimed play written by William Shakespeare,The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, should go by another name, The Tragedy of Brutus. Brutus is the main character and hidden protagonist, he is a senate member scarred by Ceaser rising so quickly to kingdom. After being mislead by many friends he decides to assist in the murder of Julius Caesar. The noble Brutus is truly the only protagonist in the play, he should be the center of the play in the stead of the short lived and arrogant Julius Caesar.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    William Penn said, “The jealous are troublesome to others, but a torment to themselves” (Penn). The two most tormented men in the plays The Tragedy of Julius Caesar and Tartuffe , Cassius and Tartuffe, come from two dissimilar plays. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a tragedy, tells the story of the rising power and death of Julius Caesar. Tartuffe, a comedy, depicts the life of a poor beggar that attempts to live in the house of a wealthy family. Both characters, Cassius and Tartuffe from the plays The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare and Tartuffe by Moliere, share the trait of jealousy, the motivation of power, and use the rhetoric device of emotional appeal to manipulate their victims, Brutus and Orgon.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cassius tells Brutus that Caesar is weak and womanist in battle. Brutus not having any selfish reasons for joining the conspiracy assumes Cassius has none either. Cassius had everyone in on the conspiracy wrapped around his finger. The man could even get Caesar's best friend to turn against him with the power of persuasion. When asking people to join him he would use a different pitch each time.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays